Preview

Ambidexterity as a Dynamic Capability- Resolving the Innovator's Dilemma

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
15864 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Ambidexterity as a Dynamic Capability- Resolving the Innovator's Dilemma
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com

Research in Organizational Behavior 28 (2008) 185–206

Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator’s dilemma
Charles A. O’Reilly IIIa,*, Michael L. Tushman b a Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA b Harvard Business School, Soldiers Field Road, Boston, MA 02163, USA

Abstract How do organizations survive in the face of change? Underlying this question is a rich debate about whether organizations can adapt—and if so how. One perspective, organizational ecology, presents evidence suggesting that most organizations are largely inert and ultimately fail. A second perspective argues that some firms do learn and adapt to shifting environmental contexts. Recently, this latter view has coalesced around two themes. The first, based on research in strategy suggests that dynamic capabilities, the ability of a firm to reconfigure assets and existing capabilities, explains long-term competitive advantage. The second, based on organizational design, argues that ambidexterity, the ability of a firm to simultaneously explore and exploit, enables a firm to adapt over time. In this paper, we review and integrate these comparatively new research streams and identify a set of propositions that suggest how ambidexterity acts as a dynamic capability. We suggest that efficiency and innovation need not be strategic tradeoffs and highlight the substantive role of senior teams in building dynamic capabilities. # 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Contents 1. Dynamic capabilities, organizational ambidexterity and competitive advantage . . . . . . . . . . 1.1. Sensing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.2. Seizing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.3. Reconfiguring . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .



References: C.A. O’Reilly III, M.L. Tushman / Research in Organizational Behavior 28 (2008) 185–206 203 C.A. O’Reilly III, M.L. Tushman / Research in Organizational Behavior 28 (2008) 185–206 205

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Hall, D. et al. (2011). Business Studies. 4th ed. Essex: Pearson Education Limited. p. 752-753.…

    • 674 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mayo CLinic Brand Model

    • 7310 Words
    • 30 Pages

    Mays Business School, Texas A & M University, 4112 TAMU, College Station, TX 77843–4112, USA…

    • 7310 Words
    • 30 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Manzana

    • 5949 Words
    • 24 Pages

    write Harvard Business School Publishing, Boston, MA 02163. No part of this publication may be reproduced,…

    • 5949 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    [21] J. A. Klein and P. G. Hiscocks, “Competence-based competition: A practical toolkit,” in Competence-Based Competition, G. Hamel and A. Heene, Eds: Wiley, 1994, pp. 183–212. [22] R. Henderson and I. Cockburn, “Measuring competence? exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research,” Strat. Manage. J., vol. 15, pp. 63–84, 1994. [23] B. Kogut and U. Zander, “Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology,” Org. Sci., vol. 3, pp. 383–397, 1992. [24] R. Sanchez, “Strategic flexibility in product competition,” Strat. Manage. J., vol. 16, pp. 135–159, 1995. [25] R. Reed and R. J. DeFillippi, “Causal ambiguity, barriers to imitation, and sustainable competitive advantage,” Acad. Manage. Rev., vol. 15, pp. 88–102, 1990. [26] I. Dierickx and K. Cool, “Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage,” Manage. Sci., vol. 35, no. 12, pp. 1504–1514, 1989. [27] D. J. Collis, “Research note: How valuable are organizational capabilities?,” Strat. Manage. J., vol. 15, pp. 143–152, 1994. [28] C. W. Hofer and D. Schendel, Strategy Formulation: Analytical Concepts. St. Paul, MN: West, 1978. [29] D. Leonard-Barton, “Core capability and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development,” Strat. Manage. J., vol. 13, pp. 111–125, 1992. [30] D. Helleloid and B. Simonin, “Organizational learning and a firm’s core competence,” in Competence-Based Competition, G. Hamel and A. Heene, Eds. New York: Wiley, 1994, pp. 213–239. [31] K. Hafeez, Y. Zhang, N. Malak, and S. Iqbal, “Determining firm key capabilities using analytic hierarchical process (AHP),” presented at the First Int. Conf. Systems Thinking in Management, Geelong, Australia, Sept. 2000. [32] K. Hafeez, Y. Zhang, and N. Malak, “Determining key capabilities of a firm using analytic hierarchical process (AHP),” Int. J. Prod. Econ.. Manuscript no. PROCE #2413, to be published.…

    • 5043 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Harvard Business School Soldiers Field Boston, Massachusetts 02163 216 west miton Drive Bolder Creek, California 95006 School of Business Administration University of Western Ontario London, Ontario N6A 3K7 Canada…

    • 9964 Words
    • 40 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    First is the question of value, the resources and capabilities is significant when it facilitate the employment of opportunities and/or the disengagement of threats. Also, a dynamic resource or capability is needed because even though they have been remarkable before in giving value, we still live in a world where change is present. Being dynamic allows the company to be flexible and able to respond quickly to unpredicted and unexpected changes in the environment. According to Jay Barney, some environmental changes are so evident that few, if any, of a firm's resources remain valuable in…

    • 1592 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Strategic Position

    • 1338 Words
    • 6 Pages

    • Capabilities, however effective in the past, can become less relevant as industries evolve and change. • Such ‘capabilities’ can become ‘rigidities’ that inhibit change and become a weakness.…

    • 1338 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Stephen S. Standifird, College of Business and Economics, Western Washington University, Bellingham, WA 98225-9077, USA. Tel: 360650-7440; Fax: 360-650-4844; E-mail: stephen. standifird@wwu.edu R. Scott Marshall, Lundquist College of Business, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403-1208, USA. Tel: 541-346-1343; Fax: 541-346-3341 E-mail: rsm@darkwing.uoregon.edu…

    • 10059 Words
    • 41 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Warwick Business School. University of Warwick, Coventry. UK. Harris Manchester College University of Oxford. Oxford. UK…

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Managers Explore and Exploit

    • 9255 Words
    • 38 Pages

    Organizational Ambidexterity in Action: How Managers Explore and Exploit Author(s): Charles A. O'Reilly III and Michael L. Tushman Reviewed work(s): Source: California Management Review, Vol. 53, No. 4 (Summer 2011), pp. 5-22 Published by: University of California Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/cmr.2011.53.4.5 . Accessed: 27/11/2011 04:22…

    • 9255 Words
    • 38 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    ** Stern School of Business, New York University, New York, NY 10012, (212) 9980864, fax (212) 995-4218, http://www.stern.nyu.edu/networks/, e-mail:…

    • 12014 Words
    • 49 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    web 2.0

    • 7126 Words
    • 29 Pages

    Segal Graduate School of Business, Simon Fraser University, 500 Granville Street, Vancouver, BC V6C 1W6,…

    • 7126 Words
    • 29 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Summary of the literature

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In recent years, the dynamic resource-based view (RBV) has attracted more and more attention. By definition, the dynamic RBV is designed to deal with resources and capabilities over time. This article introduces the concept of the capability lifecycle (CLC), and the CLC provides a comprehensive framework for the dynamic RBV of the company. The CLC refers to a general pattern and paths in the development of an organizational capability from time to time (Helfat & Peteraf, 2003). Three initial stages of a capability lifecycle are highlighted in the paper, namely founding, development,…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The concept of dynamic capabilities, as discussed above, is sleek and attractive. However, the association of dynamic capabilities only with routines is questionable, as Teece (2012) has briefly commented concerning the entrepreneurial action. It is reasonable to assume that routines or processes are the codification of a former knowledge. However, having a bunch of routines or processes does not mean that the company is able to gain more competitiveness. The main issue is the creation of new knowledge and capabilities that leads to new value creation or capture, not the stock of the existing ones. Routines can be considered as a coded knowledge; yet, there are other forms of knowledge, and knowledge coded outside routines (technical sheets, design memories, etc.). Nonaka (1991) points out the coding of tacit skills (knowledge) into explicit one. Jensen et al. (2007),…

    • 1149 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays