The author tries to go against what the author of the book says. He doesn’t believe animals should have moral consideration. He talks about doing research in order to refute what the author had to say. He then asks himself if they do have moral consideration then why are we still eating them. He goes on and talks about the difference in pain between human and animal. He then talks about how they treat animals in slaughterhouses but then goes on to talk about a farm he went to. He notices that the animals live their lives happy and are still killed for food. He likes the idea of this type of farm. He talks about we can’t just be vegetarian instead we should open our eyes and look at how are meat is killed. He also suggest that when we eat animals to give them the “respect they deserve”
The author tries to go against what the author of the book says. He doesn’t believe animals should have moral consideration. He talks about doing research in order to refute what the author had to say. He then asks himself if they do have moral consideration then why are we still eating them. He goes on and talks about the difference in pain between human and animal. He then talks about how they treat animals in slaughterhouses but then goes on to talk about a farm he went to. He notices that the animals live their lives happy and are still killed for food. He likes the idea of this type of farm. He talks about we can’t just be vegetarian instead we should open our eyes and look at how are meat is killed. He also suggest that when we eat animals to give them the “respect they deserve”