Preview

An Argument Against Slavery Being Good

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1597 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
An Argument Against Slavery Being Good
Oscar Himpflewitz
Best Answer - Chosen by Voters
~The full quote, taken out of context, is:

" I hold that in the present state of civilization, where two races of different origin, and distinguished by color, and other physical differences, as well as intellectual, are brought together, the relation now existing in the slaveholding States between the two, is, instead of an evil, a good a positive good." ... "I hold then, that there never has yet existed a wealthy and civilized society in which one portion of the community did not, in point of fact, live on the labor of the other." ...

Calhoun said it on February 6, 1837, is voicing his opposition to sending the issue of abolition to a Senate committee for study, noting that "The subject is beyond the jurisdiction of Congress - they have no right to touch it in any shape or form, or to make it the subject of deliberation or discussion." The jurisdiction issue was so obvious that he did not deign to explain it. Had he felt the need of explanation, he would have simply referred to Article I, Sections 2 and 9, Article IV, Section 2, and Amendments IV, V, IX and X of the Constitution of the USA, all of which in one way or another guarantee the right to own slaves as a basic, fundamental right under the constitution. As Calhoun (and Abe Lincoln) well knew and as each repeated constantly throughout the antebellum period, abolition of slavery could be achieved only by state law or constitutional amendment and neither congress nor the president had any right or authority to address, let alone act upon, the matter as a matter of federal constitutional law.

As to why Calhoun determined slavery as a positive good, he touches upon the idea only superficially. His reasoning coincides with similar ideas expressed at various times by folks like Lincoln. He does not deal, in that speech, with the practical economical and social reasons why slavery had become a necessity not only in the south but also for the federal

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Armistice of 1850

    • 1420 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Before the passage of the Compromise of 1850, many of the United States’ leaders found themselves at odds with one another. John C. Calhoun, a publically known pro-slavery Congressman, believed that slavery should not have been excluded from territories prior to admission to state hood. Calhoun thought that Congress did not have the power to regulate slavery in the nation’s newly acquired territories. In Calhoun’s Speech on the Admission of California- and the General State of the Union, he assesses the nature of the Union and the needs for its overall preservation. In the beginning of Calhoun’s speech, he clearly believed that the state of the Union was at harm due to its division, and was at the verge of great disaster and disunion. Although Calhoun did not provide a solution for the unity of the country, he did on the other hand argue that the power of the Union rested upon the Northern majority. “At that time there was…

    • 1420 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    blood money quests 1

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages

    When slavery was abolished, the most countries (as a whole) did not benefit as much…unlike the slave owners who were given most of the money. He thinks that if any assitance is going to be give, it should be carefully thought about and based on TODAY’S needs not the things we feel was wrong in the PAST.…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Constraint: Northern states opinion on anti-slavery, the time frame of the speech and how he gave the speech.…

    • 252 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Possible to have a cohesive and better way of living. I also believe this quote demonstrates that he believed that we cannot take after white people as models of how to live due to the fact that they are the oppressor. I think that his belief would be that trying to use the power that white people had into the way they expressed it was lethal way of thinking. With his practice of peace and living together in harmony, living in the way that power was exerted by white people of the time does not seem to be ideal to him. For the second quote present, I feel as though he would be in disagreement with it.…

    • 1268 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Section I: Calhoun’s Oregon Bill Speech: A Denunciation of Natural Law in Defense of Slavery…

    • 2081 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    John C. Calhoun was born on March 18, 1782 and died on March 31, 1850. He was an American Politician and a political theorist. He began his career as a nationalist, modernizer, and a proponent of a strong national government. Over time his views changed and he became a greater proponent of states’ rights, limited government, nullification and free trade, he saw this as the only way to save the Union. He was very well known for his intense defense of slavery as a positive good his distrust of majoritarianism and for pointing the south toward the secession from the Union. Calhoun built his reputation as a political theorist by his redefinition of republicanism to include approval of slavery and minority rights, with the Southern states the minority in question. To protect minority rights against majority rule, he called for a "concurrent majority" where the minority could sometimes block offensive proposals that a state felt infringed on their sovereign power. Always distrustful of democracy, he minimized the role of the Second Party System in South Carolina. Calhoun's defense of slavery became defunct, but his concept of concurrent majority, whereby a minority has the right to object to or even veto hostile legislation directed against it, has been cited by other advocates of the rights of…

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This logicality of Lincoln’s thoughts is even more evident in his note, ‘Fragments of Slavery’. Here, Lincoln breaks down the entire…

    • 2916 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    John C. Calhoun supported slavery because he believed that it was beneficial to the states in order for them to become prosperous. Because of that belief, Calhoun stated that it is up to individual states to protect the existence of slavery in order to keep moving forward. Another idea he brings up is that slaves should never be equal to white American citizens. If there were to be two free races, both of equal size, one will always have to be subjective to the other. Basically, he believed that it would be virtually impossible for all races to ever be truly equal to each other. This really just enforces the idea that many people held in America that white people will always be superior to everyone.…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Why Is Slavery Bad

    • 240 Words
    • 1 Page

    Slavery was really terribleof for the slaves because the cause of the cilvil war. Slavery was terrible because slaves get wiped hard each day and every time. My evidence is in excerpt 2 and 3. In exerpt 2 it states that if the slaves did not wake up and get to work the boss will get the wipe and wipe them untill they get up and go to work. The othert season that is that if the slaves did’t listen to the boss or the people that wiped them they will wiped them then kill them or the shot them.…

    • 240 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lincoln believed that slavery was insufferable and intolerable, and that Blacks should have their natural rights like the Whites and suggested to relocate the Black in order to gain their freedom.…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Back then, when this all began Abraham Lincoln had become the President. “Opening the address he stated: “I have no purpose, directly, or indirectly, to interfere with the institution of slavery in the states where it exists” (Civil War Politics and Racism). President Abraham Lincoln was very…

    • 1420 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    "Men being...by nature, all free, equal, and independent, no one can be put out of this estate, and subjected to the political power of another, without his own consent."…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Quotation: “We do what we have to do, so that we can do what we want to do.”…

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Is Slavery Bad

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages

    How would you feel if you were treated as an animal and worked your whole life with not a single cent of pay? Well that is how every slave had to live, work with no pay and mistreatment. Slavery was one of the worst things that has ever set foot in America. To get into this more the reasons slavery is evil is. First, slaves had a terrible experience coming and being here.…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ancient things

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages

    “the fate of such [slaves] that are bought, and transported from the coast to America, or other parts of the world, by Europeans, is less deplorable than that of those who end their days in their native country.”…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays