Preview

An Exploration of Utilitarian Context in the Short Story "The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas"

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2214 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
An Exploration of Utilitarian Context in the Short Story "The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas"
An exploration of utilitarian context in the short story “The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas”
In the story “The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas” there is an underlying instrument for gaining opulence. The instrument in this story is a strain on one’s moral code and buried deep in tradition. Mrs.Le Guinn, the author of “The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas”, utilizes this short story to portray how utilitarianism is justified, accepted, and deemed tolerable within society, even to the point of sacrificing the innocent to create an inescapable relative happiness.
Utilitarianism’s is based on a basic moral principle of utility. Utility in this context could be defined is a form of “happiness”. A textbook definition of utilitarianism is, “The morally best (or better) alternative is that which produces the greatest (or greater) net utility, where utility is defined in terms of happiness or pleasure. We ought to do that which produces the greatest amount of happiness or pleasure for the greater number of people” (Mackinnon). This is an applicable definition of Utilitarianism and shows the flaws with this theory instantly. According to this definition, an action of pure distaste toward another entity could be possibly justified by this principle of utility. The question arises who can justify figuratively or literally killing something innocent for something beneficial to others. Is it possible to have something so good that it can weigh out the harm it does and if there is who is at liberty to decide this matter? “Utilitarianism, as a consequentialist moral theory, holds that it is the consequences or ends of our actions that determine whether particular means to them are justified. This seems to lead to conclusions that are contrary to commonsense morality. For example, wouldn’t it justify punishing an innocent person, a “scapegoat” in order to prevent a great evil or promote a great good?” (Mackinnon). These definitions are directly related to this farce Utopia.



Cited: Erb, Scott. Maine. n.d. 22 2 2012 <Main.edu>. Guin, Ursula K. Le. "The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas". n.d. Mackinnon, Barbara. Ethics "Theory and contemporary issues" Second Editon. Boston: Clark Baxter, n.d.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Ones Who Walk Away From Omelas is a very clear depiction of the principles of Utilitarianism through the little kid who is locked in the cellar. Utilitarianism says that is a solution that works the best for the greatest number of people. Everyone in Omelas is happy and live in a “perfect” world. Their joy is all resting on one kid who lives in the absolute worst living conditions by being locked in a cellar, not seeing the sun, and getting fed junk food. The whole society knows of this evil they have bestowed on the child but they come to realize that if they let this kid out that their happiness will be taken away so they come to terms with that in whatever way they can. Some are unable to come to terms with how they are treating the…

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Every human being is raised in different environment, interacts with different group of people, and face distinctive challenges and opportunities. These experiences play a major role in shaping people’s perspective and values. Therefore, people hold different opinions and are prone to make unique decisions that may be contrasting from you and even the story. In “The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas,” the Omela community is living a joyful life because of the sacrifice of the innocent boy. The people who are leaving the town feel guilty about their happiness and decide to protect the boy’s rights: “But they seem to know where they are going, the ones who walk away from Omelas.” This clearly shows that the author advocates for the people who are leaving the town and are acknowledging their wrongdoings. The author values human rights and amendments more than her own individual happiness. However, for some people who rank happiness as their most important value, they will continue to ignore the existence of the boy and live in the town of Omelas. It is hard to blame the people who choose happiness, as it is their own values, but these polarizing viewpoints make the stories that contain moral decisions interesting. There is never a correct solution for…

    • 622 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Correct! Utilitarianism is based on the principle of maximizing happiness (or any other measure of utility) for the greatest number of people, as well as minimizing unhappiness for the greatest number. The means of achieving this outcome is not as much of an issue as the actual outcome for the utilitarian.…

    • 960 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    I will first explicate on the theory of utilitarianism. Utilitarianism is a philosophical theory which states that that which is right is what brings the greatest amount of happiness to the greatest maximum number of people. The act that manages to fulfill this criteria is the act that is then morally right. As a result, whenever we consider what is a morally right action to do, we have to keep in mind that the action that would make it so that the accumulated level of happiness in the majority would be higher than the accumulated number of unhappiness in a majority. As well, utilitarianism is bias-free, in that the happiness levels of your close friends and family do not take priority over the happiness levels of the neighbors next door, or of people in countries that you have never visited and will never…

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    What is one to make of the city of Omelas? It is a fantastical place so transcendental that the author herself struggles to properly detail its majesty. Omelas has everything— it is beautiful, technologically advanced, and bears no need for organized religion. The atmosphere is rich with music, festivities, and orgies. And even with all this excessive indulgence, the people manage to remain elite: expert craftsman in every art, scholars of the highest caliber, gentle mothers and fathers, and all-around good people. However, all this prosperity comes with a price. The success and happiness of Omelas stems from the immense and intentional suffering of one person: a small child who lives in a dark cellar and is continuously abused and neglected by the citizens. If the child were freed, it would supposedly lead to the destruction of this great city, therefore keeping it there is for the greater good. So who is to be pitied? LeGuinn presents us with a moral crossroads, a true question of ethics that is left open ended. Readers may interpret the text in many ways. They may choose to sympathize with the people of Omelas and agree with the narrator. Or, they may choose to make the revelation that there should be no happiness founded on the misery of others and blindness to truth, and if there is, that happiness is hollow.…

    • 2367 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Omelas is an idea of utopia. It is an imaginary place where everything is perfect. Utopia is something absolutely necessary to social change with a perception of something better,filled with joy so the chances of social progress is high. However, someone's utopia may cause others to lose their freedom. In the short story "The ones who walked away from Omelas" by the author Ursula K. LeGuin is based on a message that shows how society sees their happiness through someone else's misery. After building a utopia, the narrator suddenly turns it into a morality problem. The residents from Omelas put an individual in contrast to a number of people acting as a group, to justify a small evil for a greater good.…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Omelas Literary Argument

    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The short story, “The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas”, written by Ursula Le Guin, is about a so-called perfect society where the sacrifice of a child is what provides harmony, equality, and prosperity to the citizens of this city. As a reader, one is invited to create and visualize their own utopia, so that one is emerged with the reality of a moral dilemma: the happiness of many for the unhappiness of one. The symbol represented in the story reflects current and past society issues such as military sacrifice, slavery, and injustice.…

    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Through the course of this paper the author will try to demonstrate, depicting both sides of the argument, the reasons in which a follower of John Stuart Mill 's "Utilitarianism" would disagree with the events taking place in Ursula Le Guin 's "The One 's Who Walk Away from Omelas."…

    • 1220 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The conflict in “The Inheritor” reiterates the theme that the choice a person makes based on moral obligation may seem unreasonable. The man could have been killed but he felt he had to try to rescue the ewe from the dingo. Because he was true to his conscience he felt satisfied with his choice.…

    • 674 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In our society we can observe wealth and poverty, happiness and sadness, truths and lies, love and hate. All of those pairs are present every new day that comes in the world we live in and almost always they are together. In the case of the story “ The Ones Who Walk Away From Omelas” by Ursula K. Le Guin, it presents a society in which a city called Omelas’ happiness is possible by having one child live in darkness, “fear, malnutrition, and neglect.” In the city everyone knows the unfair life that this child has, even so, they do nothing about the situation. Why? If they choose to help him or her that is in bad conditions, the entire town would lose its “prosperity and delight”. The tale illustrates a group of people enslaved, like the child, by these terms that must be followed to keep the “wonderful” city.…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ursula K. Le Guin’s “The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas” is about the justification of exploitation. David L . Porter believes the story comments on the dependence of modern day societies operation on misfortune as a lack of morality. Conversely, both Sarah Wyman and Jerre Collins feel the story addresses the ethical predicament that people of modern society face. Barbara Bennett believes its primary purpose is to reveal the exploitative activities that modern society actively participates in. Ursula K. Le Guin’s “The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas” suggests humans will promote the rationalization of exploitation in order to preserve their luxurious lifestyle.…

    • 1243 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    These two stories represent totalitarian government. A totalitarian government oppresses all citizens in that society. In "The Ones Who Walk Away From Omelas" the…

    • 772 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Stuart Mill

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages

    John Stuart Mill defines utilitarianism as a theory based on the principle that “actions are right in proportions as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness” (Sparknotes Editors). There are a few important aspects of this definition. It presents utility, the existence of pleasure and the absence of pain, as both the basis of everything that people desire, as the foundation of morality. This however, does not state that it is moral for people to pursue what makes them personally happy (Sparknotes Editors).…

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Is Torture Ever Ok?

    • 2212 Words
    • 9 Pages

    As a I discussed in my third essay, there are many disputes between people on whether or not torture should ever be allowed. I am writing my opinion on this heated issue and explaining why torture should be allowed under extreme circumstances. Extreme instances that should allocate torture are: times of war, a terrorist attack, or high profile criminal activity. If lives are at stake in these circumstances than I believe torturing someone is permissible. Torturing can be a way of defending those people, but should be the last option. A lot of times in these scenarios there are no other options and torturing someone is the only way to get fast results before it is too late. I am a utilitarian thinker and I believe in the greatest good for the most people. If a lot of people 's lives are at stake in a situation and can be saved because of one criminal 's pain then torturing is the way to go. I believe that torture can be morally justified in many extreme circumstances and by regulating torture by law then it could benefit our society.…

    • 2212 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mill Utilitarianism Essay

    • 1086 Words
    • 5 Pages

    First, utilitarianism allows for the good of all. Mills wrote, "Actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness." Because morality is based on the greatest pleasure the more people who benefit from an act, the more…

    • 1086 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays