He talks about the mass authority the mind has over its imagination, yet how we are now accustomed to not believing the fictions of our imaginations because we are aware they are fiction. Belief, on the other hand, “is something felt by the mind”(pg.63). With fiction, anything can be conceived, in any circumstance, and at any time, but none of it can ever reach belief because belief “consists not in the peculiar nature or order of ideas, but in the manner of their conception and their feeling to the mind” (pg. 63). He admits to having difficulty describing belief just as difficult it is to describe feelings such as “cold, or passion of anger, to a creature who never had any experience of these sentiments” (pg. 62). Because beliefs have sentiments behind them, familiar experiences that appeal to memory or senses have a greater impact than the fictions of one’s imagination.
Hume believes that humans only predict certain reactions or sequences about the future from past experiences, which is called conditioning. Due to these experiences, each individual perceives their own reality differently because of their own specific and particular experiences. He believes in custom, as opposed to reasoning. This means that he believes people do not actually have the ability to reason why two things are connected, but rather they must have conditioning of those two things interacting from prior background. Human behavior is then affected by these customs.
With that, Hume’s beliefs are made clear in his distinctions between fiction and belief. He focuses his claims on basic individual experience and the sentiments behind one’s beliefs. Although a difficult notion to define, Hume presents his claims on belief well.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Argumentative Essay on “The Ethics of Belief” PHIL 2641 Online – Section 001 February 13, 2008…
- 779 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
This essay is mostly defending the rationality of religious faith with evidence of religious truth lacking. In section X William James says, “In truths dependent on our personal action, then, faith based on desire is certainly a lawful and possibly an indispensable thing.” William James defends that religious beliefs depend on ones personal actions and can also be justified through ones faith based on desire. He states that the evidence of religion ultimately depends on our belief. James concludes that whether we choose to believe or not we decide our own…
- 1565 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays -
Back in Hume’s time, there were mainly three schools of thought regarding the nature of morality. This debate was initiated by Thomas Hobbes’ view that moral obligations and duties came from self-regarding motives. In response to Thomas Hobbes’ argument, there are two schools of thought, namely rationalism and sentimentalism. Rationalists such as Samuel Clarke argued that morality could be explained by pure reason , and acting morally is just the same as acting rationally. Hume is on the side of the sentimentalists, as he rejects reason as the basis of morality . Hume argues, rather, that it is our moral sentiments that serve as the basis of moral approvals and disapprovals . In Hume’s picture, each action produces certain feelings in the recipients, be it pain or pleasure, and it is through sympathizing with the recipients which we have an impression of the resulting pain or pleasure in the recipients, and thus approve of or disapprove of the active person’s character trait which led to the action.…
- 216 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays -
In Rebecca’s Ted Talk “How We Read Each Other’s Minds” she successfully states problems of minds. Rebecca’s says understanding special brain regions, late developing, and causal role, gives one an understanding of the human mind.…
- 592 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
In Section 8 of Hume’s Enquiry titled “Of Liberty and Necessity”, Hume wants to discuss what liberty and necessity mean and whether or not they can be compatible with each other. This is all really a discussion of Hume’s view of free will and determinism, and how they can be easily reconciled through compatibilism where for example both liberty and necessity are required for morality. He starts off by considering the idea of necessity and defines it as, “the constant conjunction of similar objects, and the consequent inference from one to another” (Hume 150). He wants to talk about its relation to what he calls liberty. He defines his hypothetical liberty as, “A power of acting or not acting, according to the determinations of the will” (Hume 159). This sounds like free will, meaning that people have the ability to act or not act in certain ways. He wants to deny any possibility of chance, because he’s an empiricist, and if you have the possibility of chance, what can you ever really know about the world. In every case, Hume is going to want to go out into the world and see where things come from even these ideas of liberty and necessity to see if there is a way to have both. To take it further, he goes on to claim that we’re all compatibilists without even realizing it. In order to explain his reasoning, he makes three arguments: the necessity argument, the spontaneity argument, and the anti-libertarianism argument.…
- 1026 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
He says that it is not important where the hypothesis comes from, but where the decision of whether or not to believe it leads to. This explains that each decision is of an individual, and that it doesn’t matter where it comes from, which is the same for everyone, but where it will take you, which is individualized. This supports the claim that belief comes from what we as an individual are tempted to…
- 664 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
To begin with, one quote from Hume is that “the most lively thought is still inferior to the dullest sensation” (Hume 10). This phrase is synonymous with Hume’s opinion that someone’s impressions are vivacious and naturalistic due to the fact that the person can recollect an instance when the impression occurred. However, an idea, or fiction, can never be fully comprehended if someone has not experienced it firsthand. Hume also defines belief as “something felt by the mind” (Hume 32). With this being said, an example is presented: peer 1 has never flown in an airplane before. Despite the…
- 521 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
“The Ethics of Belief” written by W.K. Clifford. Explains the idea of belief and moral righteousness by coming up with the conclusion that it is morally incorrect to believe in a claim with insufficient evidence or to create a claim without sufficient evidence. Clifford brings about various analogies that prove his claim to be true such as the ship-owner and the religious group on the island. Although these ideas helped set out the theory efficiently, William James essay “The Will to Believe” believes in the opposite by stating that anyone can believe in anything without the sufficient evidence provided for a specific claim. James’s, the essay provides counterexamples to Clifford’s work as well as provides strong examples and positions to help…
- 1480 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
When we look at an action or its motive at first sight, Hume admits, our judgement may be altered by the resemblance and contiguity that person has with us, but as soon as we find that our judgement is biased, we will start to give up such a view, and look for a more general one . We would in the end sympathize with the people in the narrow circle which the person, whose character trait is being evaluated, has close interactions with, so that we can feel what those people with whom he closely interacts feel, and thereby praise or blame that character based on considering what effects such motives or character traits have on others. Such a position is referred to by many philosophers as the “general point of view”. The original sentiment is said to originate from “unregulated sympathy”, and it is the general point of view that “regulates” our sympathy so that the resulting sentiments are moral ones . Without the general point of view, sympathy is said to be unregulated because it results in sentiments that would differ greatly from person to person due to their different ability to fully sympathize with the object; but with it, sympathy becomes regulated because a position where everyone could reasonable reach, and thus give moral judgements on an equal basis, is provided…
- 685 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Many people may argue that they know themselves very well and they do not need a ‘stranger’ to tell them who they truly are, what they are manifesting etc. However, Hume refutes this aspect. Can one truly “[distinguish] and [separate their feelings, actions or what so ever] from each other [or even consider to do the separations needed to identify their personality] and have no Deed of tiny thing to support their existence?” (Hume, 1). All that he wants to raise awareness to that: ‘is possible to exist separately from your actual oneself?’ Can someone step outside of their body or self and observe everything about their personality and all, then make their own judgement and walk back in the body; speaking of death or some out of body experience? According to Hume, “if we wou'd have the idea of self-pass for clear and intelligible, It must be someone impression, that gives rise to every real idea. But self or person is not any one impression, but that to which our several impressions and ideas are suppos'd to have a reference.” (1) If that was the case, many people who have remorse of some sort would have been able to stop themselves from committing their faults and make the necessary changes; especially when the outcome known is not favorable. It is just that “the mind is a ‘kind of theatre’ where several perceptions successively make their appearance; pass, re-pass, glide away, and mingle in an infinite variety of postures…
- 1005 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Concepts are very complex definitions of everything that we see in everyday life. They are also typically never specific. Concepts of a certain thing or idea might and most probably will change if the person examining the object or idea changes his point of view. Various authors throughout the textbook have written about the different ways we could see things if we don’t close ourselves to what we can only see.…
- 881 Words
- 26 Pages
Good Essays -
Hume gives five considerations to the roles of reason and sentiment within the confines of moral motivation. These considerations are his premises for the final supposition which links sentiment and morality immaculately together, and rejects reason as a plausible explanation form oral motivation. His first consideration allows for reason to be presumed true, as the causation of moral motivation. It follows however that reason "judges either matter of fact or of relations. (Hume 84) When considering the moral crime of ingratitude as Hume does, it seems foolhardy to relate ingratitude with a matter of fact, and when I speak of matter of fact I imply the likes of the geometry,…
- 1567 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays -
to touch and feel, and Nature as a construct of the human mind. It is also a…
- 1033 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
Humes’ philosophy was quite interesting he doubts all that we have been taught his states “The contrary of every matter of fact is still possible, because it can never imply a contradiction and is conceived by the mind with the same facility and distinctness as if ever so conformable to reality.”…
- 588 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Valls seems to be the first to explain that Hume is making a distinction in this particular essay between physical causes of social behaviors and what Hume calls “moral causes,” which are what we would call sociological, today. Valls notes that “Hume’s position in this debate is very consistent with his general philosophical views.” Valls chooses this point, early in his essay, to present the text of the footnote, calling it surprising. For any reader of Hume, this footnote certainly is a surprise, at the very least; utterly confounding at the worst.…
- 575 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays