The most transitional flaw that I had to change was with distributing my opinion across the paper with enough evidence to support what I was trying to argue. My issue was that I did not always used the appropriate or strongest evidence to credit what I stated, hence making my arguments weak or incomplete. Particularly with our technology-related paper, I struggled with using unsupportive information to argue along with my ideas. It was not because I did not know what information to utilized, but rather I did not know how to identify what information was more appropriate to use. So when a specific quotation did not relate too to the thesis and topic of a paragraph, I made the decision to alter my thesis, paragraph, and evidence. Many revisions and peer readings that gave me …show more content…
Composition 2 has revolutionized my understanding of what it takes to make writing a powerful tool. The most amazing aspect of this course was for me to see the ways I grew in how I wrote, and what I wrote for, especially with the affirmative action paper. In practicality, I learned how to choose more supporting evidence from a vast collection of articles. Intellectually, I acquired the ability to understand what mattered to me, why it did, and how writing can bring forth a second opinion to many who may have opposed