Bernard Hare is a social worker-turned-writer, who was born in 1958 in the North England town Leeds, where he also grew up. Hares father was, like many other doing that time, a coal miner, and Hares mother worked as a shop worker. The money was few, but either way Hare did not feel as if he was born into poverty, even though he was. He went to school and managed to continue at college. It was first when the coal miners decided to protest against Margret Thatcher’s liberalization that he really felt a change from the great and harmonic circumstances he had lived by. Hared got caught in the middle and started to drink and do drugs. But years after getting attached to these bad habits, he sees a kid at a very young age doing the exact same thing as he did, and he decides that he wants to make a difference and help the …show more content…
Bernard Hare has lived a life full of poverty and social mobility, therefore, it is ideal for him to use his own life as an example to get his message through. Hare takes use of the rhetorical technique ethos a number of times. By drawing examples to his own life, he supports his arguments and makes himself seem more trustworthy, which makes it easier to influence the reader. The use of ethos is seen, when he states how social mobility is hard for those, who is born poor: “I had escaped poverty […] A year later I was plunged right back into poverty again,” (p.3, line 170-175). Furthermore, this is also an example of his personal journey and development, when considering how the circumstances in his childhood has influenced his life- and career-choices: “I didn’t want to be a mindless thug. Poverty wasn’t working out for me. In 1977, aged 19, I headed to rural Hertfordshire with a clear conscience and escaped the bad environment that was holding me back,” (p.3, line 154-159). Hare also uses his own experiences to create new claims that is created by them. This is especially seen in the end of the essay, where he refers to the social environment between his father and the other miners. They were having fun and nice times even though they were poor. This leads to the conclusion that poverty is a state of