Preview

Analysis of Clifford's "The Ethics of Belief"

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
743 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Analysis of Clifford's "The Ethics of Belief"
#2 Clifford offers several different reasons why he thinks our beliefs are not merely our own private business. Explain two of those reasons. Which of the two do you think is a more compelling reason to think our beliefs are not our private business? Does the more compelling reason convince you that your beliefs are everyone’s business? Why or why not?

William Kingdon Clifford was an English Mathematician and Philosopher who lived from 1845 to 1879. In 1877, he wrote “The Ethics of Belief”; which was an essay to emphasize his principle theories on certain grounds. The central point of his essay was to prove that it is always wrong for anyone at any time to accept/believe anything without any supporting significant evidence. This is the general notion followed by modern science today.
In the essay, he also talks about his theory that all our beliefs somehow affect others in our society and hence are not merely private business. He says “no one man's belief is in any case a private matter which concerns himself alone” (Clifford, I). He states various reasons to support his theory. I will discuss two of them. One of the reasons that Clifford gives us is that “all beliefs come from some sort of action and actions affect others in our society” (Clifford, I). Another reason that he gives us is that each of our beliefs gets passed on to others to some extent through communication and therefore affect the general opinion of the everyday public (Clifford, I). He also states that each belief a person accepts on poor grounds makes him more vulnerable to believe something false in the near future hence affecting the general opinion of humanity.
I personally think the second reason is a more compelling reason to think that our beliefs are not our private business. The first reason does not fit into every scenario according to me and therefore doesn’t do a better job than the second reason to explain why our beliefs are not merely our private matter. I think the second

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    So far, we have been discussing the manner in which Clifford argues that it is sometimes impermissible to believe something when one lacks adequate evidence. But remember: Clifford’s position is that it is never permissible to believe anything for which one lacks adequate evidence. How does Clifford extend the argument we’ve considered into one(s) whose conclusion(s) is/are that it is never permissible to believe anything for which one lacks adequate evidence? To what extent are his arguments for this conclusion successful? Explain.…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pt1420 Quiz 6

    • 332 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Out of all of the 16 arguments, I think that the first and the eleventh are the most compelling. The reason for this is because freedom of speech is important, and giving opinions would not only be helpful to certain things, but it is only fair. Another reason is that practicality and wisdom are both very good to have, and it would come in handy when it comes to voting and things such as that.…

    • 332 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    * P. 10 What are the kinds of issues that raise epistemological concerns? HOW WE ACQUIRE OUR BELIEFS, WHAT WE BELIEVE IS TRUE, WHETHER WE BELIEVE RATIONALLY, WHETHER WE OUGHT TO RECONSIDER BELIEFS THAT HAVE BEEN CRITICIZED---HOW TO TREAT CLAIMS PURPOSED FOR OUR ACCEPTANCE, HOW TO HANDLE IDEAS OPPOSITE OF OUR OWN BELIEFS---…

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    If the question of right or wrong has to do with the origin of belief and whether or not one has the right to believe in the first place, then would the ship owner have been culpable had the doubts about the ship’s condition not been introduced? Is a person required to investigate EVERY doubt or question that is raised by another, which directly or indirectly impacts their belief? What if the source of doubt is unreliable? Without properly addressing these questions it is difficult to determine what the ship owner’s (or anyone else’s) responsibility was in the first place. This, I assert, is the fundamental problem with Clifford’s argument. To implicitly assume that one is guilty for simply believing without “sufficient” evidence can not be easily determined because the standards and thus the determination for “right” and “wrong” are too…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    President Carter shows the way one’s belief system can change, and not always be cut and dry towards their political party, or religion. In this book, President Carter makes several different arguments for many different beliefs. Although some of President Carter’s arguments were well made, the majority were made from a religious perspective which hindered his argument. Although the very point of this book is to argue from a religious perspective, the idea of arguing from a religious perspective is not the most efficient one.…

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    This essay is mostly defending the rationality of religious faith with evidence of religious truth lacking. In section X William James says, “In truths dependent on our personal action, then, faith based on desire is certainly a lawful and possibly an indispensable thing.” William James defends that religious beliefs depend on ones personal actions and can also be justified through ones faith based on desire. He states that the evidence of religion ultimately depends on our belief. James concludes that whether we choose to believe or not we decide our own…

    • 1565 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    What I'm here to discuss is some of the flaws in Clifford's principal in The Ethics of Belief. Clifford argues that it is always wrong to believe on insufficient evidence. He brings up a couple of premises. Premise 1 is that believing anything on insufficient evidence is always harmful to others. Premise 2 is that it is always wrong for anyone to believe anything on insufficient evidence.…

    • 850 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    If “Compelling interest” is to be applied then it must be applied to all, and if that conduct is “central” to an individual religion then many laws will not hold up.…

    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    William Dean Howells' short story "Editha" reveals his practice to judge human ethics and conduct logically. Editha also expose his trend to logically judge human behavior and values. This short story also fits philosopher Charles Sanders Peirce’s categorization of a person who believes out of persistence. These people believe what is straightforward, uncomplicated, and emotionally satisfying. They are hardly ever shaken in their beliefs. They will also reiterate their beliefs to themselves and look for supporting evidence – they will refuse and disapprove any facts which contradict their so called evidence.…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    b. Bruce is prejudiced against minorities and women. Which of the following beliefs would be more helpful in overcoming his prejudice; the belief that truth is subjective and created; or the belief that truth is objective and discovered? Explain your reasoning.…

    • 622 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The second reason lets people express their feelings ,wether the be good or bad, through freedom of speech. Lets people express their feelings without being judged.…

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. Why does the author say that everyone is a theologian? Everyone has an opinion about religion…

    • 9120 Words
    • 37 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Using material from item A and elsewhere, assess the view that most people today see spirituality and religious belief as purely private and personal matters.…

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    islam

    • 1970 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Reason 4- In the Pledge of Allegiance it says “Under God” and I find that acceptable because the founding fathers put that as a respect to the nation.…

    • 1970 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the major debates in the sociology of religion is concerned with the extent to which modern industrial societies have become secularised. The founding fathers of sociology saw secularisation as the inevitable outcome of modernisation. Comte, Durkheim and Weber each assumed that when societies achieved scientific and technological complexity, individuals would cease to rely on religious meanings and explanations and instead use rational explanations to understand their world. It seems important to acknowledge then that religion should be understood, at least in part, as a source of knowledge. Both sociologists and philosophers have made a comparison between science and religion as belief systems. A belief system is a set of beliefs and ideas, which help people to make sense of and interpret the world. A community of experts who claim a special insight into the truth also supports such systems.…

    • 904 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays