INTRODUCTION
The meaning of the communication in education and distance-learning are best understood, when the types of communication among the participants involved in distance education and some related communication theories are mastered thoroughly. The communication among the students and the communication between the members and the content should not be underestimated even though the communication between the teacher and the student is a vital element of successful distance education. If it is important to attain success in teaching and learning, barriers between the sender and the receiver of the message should be eliminated. Consequently, all strategies of learning and teaching during the delivery of instruction should not reflect any barrier (Nasseh, 1997).
Different types of communication are employed in the network educational environment, such as:
• Work in collaboration with a teacher;
• Work in collaboration with other students;
• Work in collaboration with online course through a mass media.
Telecommunication technologies offer a new scope to the mentioned communication types. They make it possible to travel beyond the physical distance and time. Nevertheless, it is essential to investigate communication via telecommunication technologies in detail besides the communication theories related with education, mass media, group interaction, knowledge and skill differences of users, and the preferences and the use ability of the involved members.
Human beings need to create effective communication and establish contacts in order to survive. In other words, they need communication to provide connections and create effective understanding, get information and express feelings. Therefore, the effectiveness of the communication is measured by the message sent and feedback received. Furthermore, people’s personal, social and economic needs are also affecting communication.
Communication is a learnt activity and is provided by the media
References: 1. Asirvatham, Sandy. (2000). Beyond the distance barrier. Journal of Property Management v. 65 no5, p. 42-8. http://www.fmlink.com/ProfResources/Magazines/ article.cgi?Journal of Property Management:jpm1100a.htm 2. Berge, Zane L 3. Berge, Zane L. et al. (2001). Obstacles faced at various stages of capability regarding distance education in institutions of higher education. TechTrends v.45 no4, p. 40-5. http://www.emoderators.com/barriers/hghred_stgs.shtml 4. Cucek, Mira (2001) 9. Galusha, Jill M. (1997). Barriers to Learning in Distance Education. University of Southern Mississippi. http://www.tcom.ohiou.edu/ouln/Barriers to Learning in Distance Education.htm 10. Işman, A 11. Hara, Noriko (1998). Students’ Perspectives in a Web-Based Distance Education Course. Indiana University. http://php.ucs.indiana.edu/~nhara/paper/ mwera98.htm 12. Leach, Karen and Walker Scott (2000) 13. Mulilenburg, Lin and Berge Zane L. (2001). Barriers to Distance Education: A Factor Analytic Study. The American Journal of Distance Education. 15(2): 7-22. http://www.emoderates.com/zberge/fa_ajde_050401.shtml 14. Nasseh, Bizhan 15. Pajo, karl (2001). Barriers to the Uptake of Web-based Technology by University Teachers. Journal of Distance education. 16(1). http://cade.icaap.org/vol16.1/ pajoetal.html 16. Perreault, Heidi et al 19. Truman, Barbara E. (1995). Distance Education in Post Secondary Institutions and Business. Paper presented for an Instructional Technology Graduate Class, University of Central Florida. http://pegasus.cc.ucf.edu/~btruman/dist-lr.html John Herbert R