Analysis Of George Orwell's Essay 'Politics And The English Language'

In his essay “Politics and the English Language”, George Orwell argues that the English language is in dire need of change. To defend this stance, Orwell uses Logos as his writing style. Along with using facts and historical events to defend his claim, Orwell also structures his paper following the Toulmin Method. By using this method, Orwell can defend his claim while still refuting opposing arguements. Orwell began his paper with a clear introduction which made his view clear. As done in the Toulmin method, Orwell makes a claim. His claim is that the English language is unnecesarily complicated in numerous situations. The main sections of the English language that Orwell argues are overlycomplicated are false verbals, pretentious diction, and an overall lack of precision. To back up these claims, Orwell used five main
Becasue one of the main points of his essay was precision, ot is clear why he chose to use factual evidence to support his claims. The five literal examples used in the begining of the essay help support his thesis by showing how the English language is deteriorating in many fields of life ranging from political movemnets to psychology. Providing specific, historic examples gave his arguement another aspoct. It showed how “clunky” English is not reesrved to scientific writers or prestigious essays, but, rather, it is an issue that affects all English writers. Another way that Orwell uses Logos to support his thesis is by constructing his arguements in logical points. In the beginning of his paper, he introduces dying parts of the English language. He organizes these by first identifying the dying part, then explaining his reasoning with logical arguements. This creates a proper flow between his arguements while still keeping it clear and concise. Orgination was necessary in this essay in order to support the thesis. Orwell used the Toulmin Method to structure his