Preview

Analysis of Great Global Warming Swindle

Best Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2793 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Analysis of Great Global Warming Swindle
Analysis of The Great Global Warming Swindle

The Great Global Warming Swindle (GGWS) is a controversial documentary on climate change by British television producer Martin Durkin1. It first aired on the BBCs channel 4 on March 8, 20072. This documentary argues against conventional scientific understanding of the degree and cause of recent, observed climate change. The overwhelming view amongst climate scientists is that twentieth century global warming is largely due to an increase in atmospheric greenhouse gases resulting from increased industrialization during the last 100- 150 years. His program collides sharply with the premise outlined in former Vice President Al Gore’s Oscar-winning documentary, “An Inconvenient Truth,” which presents a bleak picture of how a buildup in greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide affects the global climate, with potentially disastrous consequences. Durkin presents an alternative view that recent global warming is neither significant nor due to human activity. The documentary does not attempt to argue the latter view through any critical deconstruction of climate science orthodoxies. Rather, it contends that modern climate scientists are at best seriously misguided in their collective opinion on the nature and causes of global warming, or are at worst guilty of lying to the rest of the community. Publicity for the documentary leans heavily towards the latter, stating that global warming is “the biggest scam of modern times”.3

The documentary uses a series of techniques to shake the viewer’s belief in current orthodox understanding and to present an amenable contrary viewpoint. Several experts, labeled as ‘authoritative’, are interviewed to lend credibility to the documentary.4 These commentators are presented as ‘insiders’ who cast doubt on the integrity of climate change science and the IPCC assessment process that has led to current orthodox understanding. Alternate scientific contentions are presented in a credible


Cited: 1. " A Summary of the Kyoto Protoco ." United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change . N.p., n.d. Web. 3 Nov. 2012. . 2. " Coldest December since late 1800s?." WND - A Free Press for a Free People. N.p., n.d. Web. 5 Nov. 2012. . 3. "8.7.2.3 Volcanoes - AR4 WGI Chapter 8: Climate Models and their Evaluation." IPCC - Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. N.p., n.d. Web. 2 Nov. 2012. 4 6. "Aerosols, their Direct and Indirect Effects." ipcc_tar. N.p., n.d. Web. 2 Nov. 2012. . 7. "Britannia Radio." Britannia Radio. N.p., n.d. Web. 2 Nov. 2012. . 8. "Dr. Jeff Masters ' WunderBlog : The Manufactured Doubt industry and the hacked email controversy | Weather Underground." Weather Forecast & Reports - Long Range & Local | Wunderground | Weather Underground. N.p., n.d. Web. 13 Nov. 2012. . 9. "Executive Summary - AR4 WGI Chapter 3: Observations: Surface and Atmospheric Climate Change." IPCC - Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. N.p., n.d. Web. 5 Nov. 2012. . 10. "Fred Singer." Breaking News and Opinion on The Huffington Post. N.p., n.d. Web. 5 Nov. 2012. . 11. Hirschler, Ben. " Solar variations not behind global warming: study| Reuters." Business & Financial News, Breaking US & International News | Reuters.com. N.p., n.d. Web. 2 Nov. 2012. . 12. Holmes, Tim . "New Left Project | Articles |The Great Martin Durkin Swindle." New Left Project | Home. N.p., n.d. Web. 6 Nov. 2012. . 13. "IPCC - Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change." IPCC - Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. N.p., n.d. Web. 5 Nov. 2012. . 14. Marshall, George . "the great chanel four swindle." Climate change denial. N.p., n.d. Web. 6 Nov. 2012. . 15. "Newsweek Hides Global Warming Denier 's Financial Ties to Big Oil | Alternet." Alternet | Alternative News and Information. N.p., n.d. Web. 4 Nov. 2012. . 16. "The Great Global Warming Swindle ." The Great Global Warming Swindle . N.p., n.d. Web. 13 Nov. 2012. . 17. The Great Global Warming Swindle (DVD). Dir. Martin Durkin. Perf. Martin Durkin. Chanel 4, 2007. Film. 18. "communiations act." legislation.gov.uk. N.p., n.d. Web. 2 Nov. 2012. . 19. "communications act." legislation.gov.uk. N.p., n.d. Web. 2 Nov. 2012. . 20. "full complaint." complaint to ofcom regarding the great global warming swindle. N.p., n.d. Web. 2 Nov. 2012. . 21. type, job. "Martin Durkin - IMDb." IMDb - Movies, TV and Celebrities. N.p., n.d. Web. 13 Nov. 2012. . 22. "Climate Change Denial » THE GREAT CHANNEL FOUR SWINDLE." Climate Change Denial. N.p., n.d. Web. 11 Dec. 2012. .
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Crt205 Mapping an Arguement
    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Crt205 Mapping an Arguement

    The author, “Contoski, asserts that global warming is scientifically unproven and that the facts reveal that the earth periodically experiences changing climates” (Global Warming Is a Myth). Contoski “denies that carbon dioxide emissions have any noticeable impact on global temperatures claims that human-made emissions are insignificant when compared to carbon output of natural sources that have always been beyond human control.” (Global Warming is a Myth)…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Rhetorical Analysis: An Inconvenient Truth
    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Rhetorical Analysis: An Inconvenient Truth

    In the documentary, “An Inconvenient Truth,” Al Gore offers a rallying cry to his audience in an attempt to gather support to help fight the Earth’s climate crisis. In order to do this, he presents his audience with a variety of facts on the issue of global warming and provides stories on his background experiences as an environmentalist. He details his experiences studying global warming, his involvement with environmental Senate hearings that led nowhere, and he lays out solid facts about the Earth’s atmospheric issues to ascertain his credibility as an environmentalist. For example, he references the failure of the Kyoto Treaty to appeal to Congress and how it may have helped significantly reduce carbon emissions…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Macksim Gelman Paper
    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Macksim Gelman Paper

    Maksim Gelman is a Ukrainian, and also a naturalized American man that was responsible for a heinous four victim killing spree from February 11-12 in 2011 in New York City's Brooklyn and Manhattan; he is also responsible for the wounding of at least five others. He is interviewed in A&E'S THE KILLER SPEAKS where he displays the ruthless and remorseless mind of a murderer.…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Lower Division Capstone
    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Lower Division Capstone

    The purpose of this paper is to create an outline with three levels for a paper that is titled “Global Warming: Fact or Fiction” and support the points listed.…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Response
    • 1076 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Response

    This week’s readings had the common theme of global climate change. All of these sources encompassed different aspects of climate change. John Houghton’s “The Greenhouse Effect” was more factual and scientific. S. Goerge Philander’s “The Ozone Hole, A Cautionary Tale” was informational too, however, the piece also discussed global reactions to the rapid climate change. Thomas R. Karl and Kevin E. TrenBerth’s “Modern Global Climate Change”, focused on the intensity of anthropogenic influences of climate change and the dismal projection of the future. In “Stabilization Wedges: Solving the Climate Problem for the Next Fifty Years With Current Technologies”, Stephen Pacala and Robert Socolow went in a different direction and presented a positive outlook on the improvement of the Earth’s current environmental state and introduced the idea of stabilization wedges. Lastly, the IPCC 2014 Summary report is a report that focused on looking at how nations can act to limit climate change. In the rest of this response, I will provide a synopsis of the goals and themes that were displayed in each of the readings. Finally, I will reflect on any questions or concerns the readings have evoked in me.…

    • 1076 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Issue 8: Is Global Warming Skepticism Just Smoke and Mirrors?
    • 2816 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Issue 8: Is Global Warming Skepticism Just Smoke and Mirrors?

    What exactly is global warming? Do you know the answer, maybe you do, however, taking a pretty good educated guess I would tend to think that most people think they have a pretty good idea when in actuality they have no clue what so ever about global warming. The current frenzy over global warming has galvanized the public and cost taxpayers billions of dollars in federal expenditures for climate research. It has spawned Hollywood blockbusters and inspired major political movements. It has given a higher calling to celebrities and built a lucrative industry for eager scientists. In short, ending climate change has become a national crusade. And yet, despite this dominant and sprawling campaign, the facts behind global warming remain as confounding as ever. Let’ s start by talking about the definition; according to Sir David King and Gabrielle Walker’ s, 2008, book titled “The Hot Topic “ global warming is defined as a gradual increase in the earth’s surface temperature. A more popular usage definition would be global warming is caused by human activity, or let’s look at a more technical term anthropogenic. The debate would be is global warming observed naturally or is it man made? Some might actually take on a debate about the natural causes, like is the sun getting hotter; or maybe the debate would lean more towards human causes, carbon dioxide , here is a good example: the exhaust from cars and power plants that pollute our air. Which side of the debate would you take? One in respect to thinking that global warming is a serious problem, then again maybe global warming has only clouded the issue or in simple terms; how the climate system really works and why man’s role in global warming is more myth than science, and how the global warming hype has corrupted Washington and the scientific community.…

    • 2816 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Spin or Science
    • 6936 Words
    • 32 Pages

    Spin or Science

    Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS). 2011. Debunking misinformation about stolen climate emails in the “Climategate”…

    • 6936 Words
    • 32 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Global Warming DBQ
    • 360 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Global Warming DBQ

    Global warming has not been taken serious by the government. The world does not really take it as a threat. Cars pollute the atmosphere more and more every day. The temperatures keep rising, yet, the government still doesn’t believe it is taking place. (Document C) Global warming is not a game, it is something serious. Therefore, the world should be very concerned about it.…

    • 360 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Oreskes Climate Change
    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Oreskes Climate Change

    There have been plenty of disputes regarding the infamous topic global warming, despite the fact that there is a unanimous scientific consensus on anthropogenic climate change. A history professor at UCSD, Naomi Oreskes, discusses this in her article, “The Scientific Consensus on Climate Change”. She begins her investigation by researching credible experts and environmental organizations, such as the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the National Academy of Sciences, and several others. By utilizing these various sources as evidence it strengthens her argument about the scientific consensus on anthropogenic climate change. In this case, Oreskes audience consists of the general public with a minimal education of high school, interested about climate change. This article is published in a standard science magazine thus the selected audience should have some background knowledge regarding global warming, otherwise it would be too complex to comprehend. She constructs three main dependent claims that convince readers in support of her main claim-that humans are affecting climate change. These three main dependent claims consist of a report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, peer reviewed scientific journals, and concrete factual evidence from various corporation supporting her claims. As a result, it has allowed her to create a more persuasive argument, by using logic based data and credible sources with contextual knowledge on climate change.…

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Secret Campaign of President Bush's Administration to Deny Global Warming
    • 406 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Secret Campaign of President Bush's Administration to Deny Global Warming

    This article gives an in-depth discussion of the past Bush administration and the issues regarding global warming. Essentially, the article accuses former President Bush and the White House of covering up six years of deceit regarding the global warming issue. Paramount in the article discussion is the author’s view regarding false statements stated by the Bush administration. These include failure to deliver the following promises; capping of carbon emissions, saving jobs, curbing greenhouse gases, making pollution cuts voluntary, investing in hydrogen cars, and etc.…

    • 406 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Neoliberalism: A Critical Criminological Critique Theory
    • 1098 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Neoliberalism: A Critical Criminological Critique Theory

    Oreskes (2010: 180) finds mainstream scientific scepticism around climate changes degrading effect on the environment, vested in the interests of destabilising corporations in industries such as fossil fuel. Similarly to tactics used by the tobacco industry, corporate investment in scientists and think tanks did this by refuting existing scientific literature…

    • 1098 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Methane Primary Threat Considered Secondary Issue
    • 1710 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Methane Primary Threat Considered Secondary Issue

    [4] "2011 U.S. Greenhouse Gas Inventory Report." EPA. Environmental Protection Agency. Web. Feb. 2012. .…

    • 1710 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Asfew
    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Asfew

    This Time magazine article talks about the extremes of global warming, from the very cold winter of 2010 to the extreme heat of 2012. The article goes on to talk about how global warming is adversely affecting the people of the United States through forest fires and by living in lands that have been scorched by the continually rising temperatures. This article does a very good job addressing the skeptics of global warming and shows them proof of global warming.…

    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Persuasive-Global Warming
    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Persuasive-Global Warming

    Shah, Anup. "Issues on the Global Issues Web Site." - Global Issues. N.p., n.d. Web. 17…

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Global Warming Hoax
    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Global Warming Hoax

    There has been talk about global warming for years. Global Warming is an increase in the earth's average atmospheric temperature that causes corresponding changes in climate and that may result from the greenhouse effect. Some of the “results” of global warming include, increase in temperatures, extreme weather patterns, rise in sea levels, massive crop failures, wide spread extinction of species, and Disappearance of coral reefs. So the question is, is it a hoax to generate fear and panic and control people’s lives and financial gain? Or are we really destroying our own planet?…

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics