Analysis Of In Defence Of The Igeneration By Renee Wilson

In the article In defence of the iGeneration by Renee Wilson (2013), the author claims that although many people have critical labels on the iGeneration (who born in the 1990s), this generation is scary clever and could be the best generation yet. Moreover, iGeneration is really good at technology and social communication. Levey, who is a professor of communication, he thinks that the development of technology in recent years made teenagers’ mind incompatible with traditional learning (Levey). In addition, the iGeneration have come of age with the technology developing rapidly society. The author believes the iGeneration is thirsty for honesty and direct, transparent communication (Renee 2013). I want to claim that while this article tries to addresses the iGeneration would be the best generation, but the author still needs some convincing examples, evidences, and counter arguments to support the argument because of two reasons: not has stringency and has bias.
As Renee (2013) quotes one sentence from Giselle Kovary, a co-founder and Managing Partner of Toronto-based ngen People Performance Inc., “Everyone dumps on the youngest generation, but this generation is scary smart and known for its innovation and creativity”. Renee (2013) does not use any powerful examples to support this argument then readers would not be easy to agree with this point. In addition, the author attempts to claim the iGeneration is better at technology and social communication than other generations. However, there are only a few evidences could support this argument. In the article, Renee (2013) claims that the iGeneration is good at using social networking which is very important in their daily