Stein provides his counter argument first to draw readers in and to intrigue his audience so that they will continue to read the article. Upon first glance, Joel Stein seems to be scrutinizing millennials by calling them "fame obsessed" (28). Stein then shifts to sympathizing and praising millennials towards the middle of the article by stating that "millennials' perceived entitlement isn't a result of overprotection but an adaption to a world of abundance" (31). Stein's strategy in providing his counterargument against millennials at the beginning of the article appeases to an older audience because he is criticizing the younger generation, therefore making the older audience more interested in reading. By criticizing millennials at the beginning of the article, a younger audience is targeted because it causes them to want to continue reading about themselves. Stein then proceeds to present his argument that millennials are not horrible in the second half of the article. For example, Stein claims at the end of the article that millennials are "earnest and optimistic" and "cool and reserved" (34). By presenting his argument favoring millennials after his argument criticizing millennials, Stein compels his audience to continue reading because it is intriguing. By criticizing millennials, he is capturing his audience's …show more content…
At the beginning of the article, Stein seems to criticize millennials by stating that "what millennials are most famous for besides narcissism is its effect: entitlement" (28). By calling millennials narcissistic and entitled, the reader could believe that Stein does not favor millennials. In reality, Stein does favor millennials, but he has presented all the facts and data for his counter argument first. Another argument that those with opposing opinions may have is that Joel Stein is condemnatory of millennials at the beginning of the article, therefore he is ineffective in convincing his audience that millennials are not as bad as they are perceived to be. Stein only criticizes millennials in the first half of the article to catch the attention of readers and to draw people in so that they will find the article interesting and will continue to read. Stein states at the beginning of the article that millennials are, "cocky about their place in the world" to emphasize that they feel entitled (29). This criticism appeals to readers and