Throughout his study he learned that the arctic wolves mostly lived by eating mice, squirrel, and even fish. When wolves hunted caribou they only killed the weak and sick. The wolves never attacked him even when they had so many opportunities to do so.“On three separate occasions in less than a week I had been completely at the mercy of these ‘savage killers’; but far from attempting to tear me limb from limb, they had displayed a retstrain verging on contempt...This much was obvious, yet I was still strangely reluctant to the myth go down the drain. Part of this reluctance was no doubt due to the thought that, by discarding the accepted concepts of wolf nature, I would be committing scientific treason;”(p76,77) This passages sums up how Mowat struggled to find the truth about wolves’ hostility. Mowat was in the middle of a scientist’s tug-of-war. On one side everything he had learned as a naturalist and on the other, the actions of the wolves that Mowat observed with his own …show more content…
“Of the hunts I subsequently watched, almost all followed the pattern of the first one I had seen.” (p200) Mowat followed the wolves as they hunted and he realized that Ootek was right - the wolves only preyed on the weak and sick. He also observed that the wolves did not waste any food and that they only killed what they needed. Mowat also saw the wolves’ method of training their pups. Adult wolves separated the caribou,chased a couple of fawns and then let the pups take over the chase and try to take them down. All that Mowat learned abled him to comprehend how wolves lived and worked together to survive. The reader can expand her knowledge of wolves because information presented comes together to make this book more