Preview

Analysis Of The May Li Massacre

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
618 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Analysis Of The May Li Massacre
The May li massacre was a terrible circumstance and an event that happened March 16th 1968 during the Vietnam War, in which American soldiers rape, pillage and killed unarmed Vietnamese civilians in a small village, the result was worldwide outrage. As the three companies (Charlie Company), led by Lieutenant Calley entered the village and started firing at the villagers that included women, children and elderly as well as raping the young women, LT Calley himself put a enormous amount of villagers in a ditch and began firing on them. The total deaths ended up being approximately 500 villagers. As I remember the movie “Platoon” 1986, there was a part, in which soldiers fired on a village, making that a small snapshot of that portion of the Vietnam War. LT Calley was investigated and sentenced to prison with hard labor, but was later released. Was he the scape goat? On this paper, I will discuss what led the …show more content…
A few things come into play, the dehumanization factor, in which the Vietnamese people, were looked at as nonessential and it was necessary to stay in the boundaries of the strategic plan, additionally there will be a known hatred for those people or groups that experience the violence. The authorization, is the power that a person possesses and that person holds over another person, LT Calley ordered his man and they killed in the village. Someone holds the authority over Calley, which was Captain Ernest Medina and over Captain Medina, Lt. Colonel Barker, and the list can keep going on the upward leadership. Could it also be sociopath thinking, I wouldn’t necessarily compare those soldiers to Ted Bundy, but it is a thought. For example, those soldier who thought or were made to think, that what they were doing was right, but in reality there was something wrong with them and they can’t put reality into a true perspective, which causes them think that they were not doing anything wrong. The fighting in the Vietnam War and stress associated

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ronald Haeberle Essay

    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages

    After the public discovered what happened in My Lai, the people no longer knew what to think of the military efforts, they just knew they were sick of the war and constant bloodshed. When news of the massacre came out “Demands for withdrawal from Vietnam continued to grow, while others questioned the idea of blind loyalty to military leadership” (Experience). The people were already not happy with the war, but knowing that hundreds of innocents had been slaughtered completely destroyed their trust; more people began asking for a withdrawal from Vietnam and questioning the ideal of blindly following orders. These pictures didn’t just impact the Americans at home however, after the implementation of “Vietnamisation” many of the ground troops began to lose morale. The morale was so low among the ground troops that “many of them were annoyed, frustrated and addicted to drugs as a result”(Rohn). The My Lai massacre served as a huge turning point in the public opinion of the war; people no longer supported the war and soldiers could not handle such low morale, to the point where many soldiers turned to drugs. A mix of all these things coming together brought forth the idea of Vietnamisation, a system to equip and expand South Vietnamese soldiers and pull out American…

    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    On March 16, 1968, there were more than 400 Vietnamese civilization in My Lai and Khe combined. This was one of the darkest days in the nation's military…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    During the course of the Vietnam War, many infamous events occurred, including the disastrous My Lai Massacre. On the morning of March 16, 1968 the Charlie Company, led by Lieutenant William Calley, marched into the small village of My Lai in Vietnam prepared to fight the enemy; the whole operation took less than an hour to complete. In the end, more than five hundred people-mostly women, young children and infants, and the elderly-were killed (Trueman “My Lai Massacre”). A frantic cover-up by the American army followed in an attempt to hide it from the public eye. One year later, it was publicized and reluctantly investigated by the government; however, the soldiers involved were not entirely open to discussion about the massacre and did not…

    • 1970 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    In December of 1937, the Japanese Imperial Army overtook China's capital, Nanking and slaughtered 300,000 Chinese civilians. The Japanese army raped and looted hundred of thousands of people using inhumane and barbaric methods. This event is referred to today as one of the worst atrocities during WWII in the Asian theatre. The actions led by the Japanese exemplified China's weak military as well as their insufficient government, allowing for other countries to take advantage of later opening China into spheres of influence. Due to the Nanking Massacre, China culturally became more ethnocentric, politically decimated any friendly relationships with the Japanese, and became economically isolated. The invasion of Nanking began when the Japanese Imperial Army marched into Shanghai; the Japanese expected the battle of Shanghai to be quick and effortless, even stating…

    • 1468 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Kelman and V. Lee Hamilton wrote about the tragic massacre of Vietnamese civilians by American soldiers. The My Lai Massacre allegedly occurred on March 16, 1968, however, due to military conspiracy and cover ups the issue remained hidden for a full year. Brought to court on charges in 1969 and 1970. Even though 14 of the high ranking officials had charges against them only one was convicted, which issued alarm and questions. The massacre was documented by soldiers and reports The army commanders assumed all the innocent civilians would be at the market and those remaining would be Vietcong related individuals. Orders were given to Charlie Company that summarized told to destroy the village and all in it. The My Lai Massacre was what is described as a sanctioned massacre “acts of indiscriminate, ruthless, often systematic mass violence, carried out by paramilitary personnel while engaged in officially sanctioned campaigns” (Kelman and Hamilton 137). Sanctioned massacres often described by the authors, are massacres ordered by a higher person that are deemed acceptable due to their authority. The article ends with the authors concluding that massacres are due to political forms dehumanizing civilians as just bodies to be…

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Vietnam War Dbq

    • 939 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This desire for body count was part of Westmoreland’s plan to reach a cross-over point in which enemy forces were being killed faster they could be replenished. He believed that the US could out produce and out supply North Vietnam, and he was ready to attrit and rack up casualties until they fell. This focus on body counts as a measure of progress and success was an additional failure of US military policy. Unit commanders and captains were given kill quotas for their units, and if they did not meet the quotas they were replaced. This immense pressure to produce would lead to indiscriminate killings and atrocities, sometimes even “encourage soldiers to continue the violence.” The My Lai massacre was just one example of platoons wiping out entire villages of people and writing them up as Viet Cong killed in action to drive up the body count. This practice was widespread in the villages of Vietnam and grew even larger as the US begin to set up their own counter guerrilla teams and task forces which would be responsible for most of the massacres in the villages. The obsession with body counts and kill ratios as a measure of success lead to a shoot first, ask questions later mentality from many soldiers, most of whom were taught that everybody they meet is a potential “VC sympathizer” and could be a…

    • 939 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    George Orwell’s essay “Politics and the English Language” written in 1946 discusses how language can be used to obscure what one is saying. Orwell states that language can be snow obscuring details (2). He talks of how politicians use this to their advantage when trying to win the public's opinion. Some twenty years this is exemplified by the US’s involvement in Veitnam. The famous statement “We had to destroy the village in order to save” is what Orwell was describing in his essay. Although the origin and authenticity of this statement is often challenged it does does summarize the U.S.’s stance on the Veitnam war; meaning the use of deception through media, and the disregard of Vietnamese civilians wellbeing.…

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    My Lai Massacre

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Due to the frustration, lack of belief and low morale of US soldiers in post-Tet Vietnam, a village named My Lai had been massacred in March 1968. The village had been a stronghold for Vietcong troops and most of the villagers had been communist, Vietcong sympathizers. During a routine search and destroy mission, Charlie Company, led by Lieutenant William L. Calley, was ordered to destroy the village. Charlie Company had lost a total 28 men which is almost 1/5 of the companies original size. While tensions were still high from the Tet offensive, Charlie Company marched in My Lai and did not find any Vietcong troops. However, they still proceeded to round up all villagers and kill, rape or torture them. Up to 500 villagers had been killed and once pictures of the incident had reached TV, further escalation of US protestors occurred.…

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I was able to reflect on my own culture during the ruling of the Zong Massacre case. In my cultural it is absolutely senseless to think murdering a human could possibly have any justification. The fact that people in the 1780’s could claim slaves as property and file them on insurance is unbelievable. The color of one’s skin should not play into account when it comes to what someone’s life value is. I could not put a price on what an individual’s life is worth.…

    • 173 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    They were used to simple rules followed by society, knowing that killing is bad, your not allowed to drink alcohol under 21, and simply how to stop at a stoplight. Your morality is twisted and turned by the effects of war as killing once may have been bad in society but when you're faced against the dilemma that it's either “kill or be killed” the soldiers thoughts and emotions change drastically in that moment and forever. In society it's a rare moment to even come close to dying on a daily basis, whereas these soldiers are faced with almost dying every day instantaneously, they change because the set of rules they may have been used to following have changed. Killing may have been bad but now they are forced to survive without even taking a second thought to as if what they are doing is bad. If they had the moment to think about it in their thoughts they would be thinking about how the people they are killing may have families, be somebody's son/daughter, somebody's brother, somebody's lover,etc. If they were not forced to do this their morality and emotions wouldn't let most of them be able to do…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    My Lai Massacre

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The impact of the My Lai massacre on the Viet Cong was quite big, as they weren't in the town to…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Why Did Peevalu Die

    • 1579 Words
    • 7 Pages

    They don’t want their family to be killed like how their friend’s were killed. The threat goes up and up all the way to the highest rank, and that rank is brainwashed to thinking that what they are doing is right and that any other way they do things is completely wrong.…

    • 1579 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    the mai lye massacre

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1. Sources 33 and 34 do and don’t make to same point. Source 33 is about they are going to kill the idea of communism not just to kill people, but to kill the thinkers on communism. Source 34 is about how men were going to war but not the kill innocent people. It also talks about the idea of Nazi’s that they are not killing for the sake of killing, but killing to get something across.…

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    My Lai Massacre Essay

    • 1475 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Kelman and Hamilton claim written orders were never issued (par 6). All orders were passed by word of mouth; by the time they had traveled through Barker, Medina, Calley and finally to the soldiers, the only message that was conveyed was this: the Son My area must be destroyed (Kelman and Hamilton, par 7).Soldiers were under the impression that only VC would be in that village. The Peers Report, mentioned in Kelman and Hamilton’s composition “The My Lai Massacre: A Military Crime of Obedience,” said that it is “reasonable to conclude that LTC Barker’s minimal or nonexistent instructions concerning the handlings of noncombatants created the potential for grave misunderstandings” (par 7). These vague directions were destined to bring about poor results. Because of the ambiguity of the orders, our soldiers cannot be held responsible for the outcome of My…

    • 1475 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Balangiga massacre was an incident in 1901 in the town of the same name during the Philippine–American War. It initially referred to the killing of about 48 members of the US 9th Infantry by the townspeople allegedly augmented by guerrillasin the town of Balangiga on Samar Island during an attack on September 28 of that year. In the 1960s Filipino nationalists applied it to the retaliatory measures taken on the island. This incident was described as the United States Army's worst defeat since the Battle of the Little Bighorn in 1876. Filipinos regard the attack as one of their bravest acts in the war (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balangiga_massacre).…

    • 504 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays