Preview

Analysis Of The Mysterious Deaths Of The Princes In The Prince

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
890 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Analysis Of The Mysterious Deaths Of The Princes In The Prince
The Mysterious Deaths of the Princes in the Tower On April 23, 2013, Vanessa Hudgens, an American actress, stated, “So many people try to grow up too fast, and it’s not fun! You should stay a kid as long as possible!” (Brainy Quotes). This was a nice sentiment, but Prince Edward V and Richard, Duke of York, had no choice in the matter. Long before they reached adulthood, the princes had great responsibility and hardship thrust upon them. Then, they vanished, murdered in their sleep and cursed to be children forever, but by whom? The two prevailing theories that explain the deaths of Prince Edward V and Richard, Duke of York, are these: either King Richard III was responsible for the murder of the princes, or someone else was. Since the disappearance …show more content…
Notably, Alison Weir, a UK historian and author, claims, “[Richard III] was the only person with the authority and obvious opportunity to dispose of the Princes” (164). Moreover, Weir also states that “Richard himself viewed the Princes as a danger” to his hold on the throne (165). Richard III clearly possessed the means and the motive to murder his nephews, as many will do anything in an attempt to ensure the continuity of their power. Furthermore, in 1502, Sir James Tyrell confessed under torture to the murder of the princes (Gallagher). However, it is presumed that Tyrell was only following the orders of his king, Richard III, when he committed the murders (Gallagher). Additionally, Richard III never offered an explanation of the princes’ disappearance despite the rumors which harmed his reputation (Weir 164). His silence on the matter only served to further incriminate him, especially when coupled with the confession of Sir James Tyrell. Considering the sheer amount of evidence against King Richard III, the theory that he instructed Sir James Tyrell to murder the princes is the strongest, most believable

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    After Edward IV died in 1483, a dispute began between to major factions – the Woodvilles and Richard of Gloucester. The Woodvilles were the family of Elizabeth Woodville, Edward’s wife, with whom he shared many children. Edward V, the heir to the throne, was the son of Elizabeth Woodville, and so this put them in a good position. However, Richard of Gloucester was Edward’s brother and had shown himself to be a very useful and successful man to Edward during his reign. They both had their various strengths and weaknesses, and they both wanted the same thing. Control of England.…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the book, something quite interesting took place. Ibrahima met a Caucasian person for the very first time. Ibrahima was recognized by a marooned Irish ships’ surgeon by the name of John Coates Cox. The surgeon referred to him as the son of an African king, who had helped save his life many years ago. Cox was once found ill caused by insect bites.…

    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    This is a significant analysis of Niccolo Machiavelli’s book The Prince. This book explores multiple concepts on leadership and governance for a Prince to legislate on his road to success. Therefore, I will bring a compelling conclusion on how Russian President Vladimir Putin is a modern Machiavelli. To get a full understanding towards Niccolo Machiavelli’s political theory, we must first examine what’s managed to inspire his view of an ideal government. In the book, The Prince, Machiavelli introduces insightful claims on how the Roman Empire’s legitimacy brought a secure and stable society. In fact, presenting the Roman Empire’s platform helped the reader to thoroughly understand Machiavelli’s political theory regarding governance and the…

    • 230 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When Edward VI died in 1483, there was debate as to who was most suited to take up his position on the throne. It has been argued that Richard, Duke of Gloucester had himself set on usurping the throne from the rightful heir Edward V, as soon as his brother died. Others argue that it was never the case that his immediate wishes were to seize the throne; actions after his brother’s death led him to this decision. There is evidence for and against to support the principal statement.…

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Niccolo Machiavelli’s The Prince examines how to acquire and maintain power of a nation. Machiavelli states that nations are either republics or principalities. The four types of principalities are hereditary, new, mixed and ecclesiastical. Hereditary principalities occur when the prince inherits the nation from his ancestors. Hereditary states experience fewer difficulties compared to newer states because they are accustomed to the family of the prince. New Principalities are acquired either by the power of others, one’s own power, luck, or ability. New Principalities are either accustomed to the rule of a prince or was a free state. When a prince conquers a free state it threatens the people’s lifestyle and customs. Therefore, the people…

    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Markus Zusak’s poignant novel The Book Thief chronicles the struggles of a young bibliophile who suffers great losses during the time of the Holocaust. Death trails Liesel Meminger as she slowly develops literacy and a passion for pilfering novels. The theme of death recurs throughout the novel as it presents itself continuously within tragedy and suffering.…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Napoleon Bonaparte is a well known political leader of the modern world. His conquests into other European countries and his military knowledge make him the historical legend that he has come to be. He made himself emperor of France and ended the French Revolution. Bonaparte’s successes in France cause him to be revered as a great leader who exemplifies Niccolò Machiavelli’s beliefs regarding the leadership of a country. Machiavelli offers advice to political leaders in his novel, The Prince, which is proven relevant through Napoleon’s ability to be war-minded, feared, and a good leader.…

    • 174 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Richard, Duke of Gloucester always detested his brother Edward IV after his secret marriage to Elizabeth Woodville, as he was made to look a fool by him when he found out they was married. Furthermore, when society found out of this marriage, this almost put Gloucester at an advantage because in that century, the King was supposed to marry a person that would influence the Kingdom in a good way, not out of love. Nevertheless, Because of this, Gloucester revealed that it was rumoured that Edward IV was already married, when he was got married to Elizabeth Woodville. For this reason, the marriage was deemed illegitimate, thus making Edward V’s inheritance of the throne illegitimate. This was a very strong move from Gloucester, and ultimately, because of this, he gained the throne, and the power to…

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Prince was written in the 1500’s by Niccolo Machiavelli, whom name became a synonym for crafty plotting. As noted, it is a political and social document, as relevant today as when it first appeared. Machiavelli’s work became thought of as a blueprint for dictators instead of a guide for efficient democratic government. The Prince does not give us all of Machiavelli’s political thinking; however, he devised this reading for the man who seeks power. It treated the most severe problem of Italy, its inferiority in political organization and military strength to nearby states like Spain and France and was addressed to princes like the Lorenzo “The Magnificent” Medici, to whom it was dedicated. As difficult as it was to read, I did not find…

    • 1617 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the War of the Roses, England was constantly in a state of war between the House of Lancaster and the House of York, who were massive rivals that competed for the throne of England (History 320 Lecture, 10/30/2015). In Polydore Vergil’s account of Henry VII, Richard III’s personal ambition can be seen. The author first tells of a nightmare Richard has the night before Bosworth Field, which Vergil believes was “no dream but a conscience guilty of heinous offences, a conscience, I say” (Polydore Vergil, Account of Henry VII, 479). Though the source makes no explicit mentions of it, it is widely believed that Richard III murdered his nephews to take the throne. When his brother, Edward IV died, his legitimate son was crowned Edward V, but was shortly taken captive by his uncle and placed into the Tower of London (History 320 Lecture, 10/30/2015). Instead of allowing for a legitimate heir to take the throne as it should have gone, Richard went to immeasurable lengths to ensure he would be king, further escalating the conflict and disrupting English society as a whole. This caused not only great scandal, but Richard III was a terrible king, guilty of many offenses as Vergil states. He created great disruption not only in his court by taking the throne away from his nephew, but also to the lives of his subjects. Vergil makes note of this as well, specifically mentioning the strife of the English people, who had consistently been “torn by rival factions” (Polydore Vergil, Account of Henry VII,…

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In December 1483 the bodies of Prince Richard and Prince Henry, only 12 and 9, were found murdered in the Tower of London. The mystery of who killed the boys is still a mystery to this day, however many suspect their uncle Richard III of York. Many historians who recorded the event explicitly express that they’re certain Richard III is responsible, and there’s many valid reasons to support their assumption.…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Crossbow Persuasive Essay

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages

    There is no doubt that Richard and Joffrey shared similar personalities: they are both flagitious. In the play Richard III, Richard not only spreads rumors of his own brothers, but also kills them in order to gain more power and obtain the crown. Similarly, Joffrey slaughters every potential threat to his throne, from powerful nobles to innocent civilians. Despite the fact that they are both cruel, their ways of interpreting cruelty are profoundly different. Richard was a subtle, sneaky, deceitful person. In the play, he didn’t simply just stand out and kill people. On the contrary, he manipulated his followers to perform the murders. Consequently, other royalties would never expose his secrets. Joffrey, on the other hand, is a well-known tyrant. He kills people without evidence that they have betrayed the throne. Joffrey and Richard differ in their attitude towards others: while Richard III is shrewd and hides his motives, Joffrey let his emotions overrule his strategic developments. Joffrey’s impulsiveness is a critical factor to his final, though Richard III was able to successfully avoid death thus far in his…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fling

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Once Richard took the throne he was known as Richard III. He was the great-great-grandson of Edward III and the uncle of the previous king Edward V. It was rumoured that he caused the death of the princes in the tower. Although it was never proven he had a motive to do it because he wanted the throne for himself. To help himself get there he also started a rumour that Edward IV and Elizabeth Woodville’s marriage was illegitimate because Edward had already been set to marry someone before Elizabeth. People believed what they heard which meant they believed that Edward V was also illegitimate to have the throne, and so shortly after Richard was made king. During his reign the Buckingham Rebellion took place. Henry Stafford, The Duke of Buckingham, was once a loyal supporter of Richard but switched sides to bring Richard down. This caused Richard to build a huge army, but it wasn’t particularly strong. The rebellion failed leaving Richard still on the throne; however it left a…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Wars Of The Roses Causes

    • 1589 Words
    • 7 Pages

    During this time, Richard, Duke of York had mostly been serving in Ireland and was gaining influence as a champion of the public’s discontent with the crown after its series of losses in France and economic difficulties. As Henry VI was still childless, Richard was now the heir presumptive, as a distant relative of Henry VI through a different son of King Edward III. William de la Pole, Duke of Suffolk was widely believed to be at fault for the loss of Normandy, and was directly accused of such by Richard, Duke of York. Suffolk was then sentenced to exile, but was murdered during his flight.…

    • 1589 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    A good leader is one who can stand up against the norm and take risks to uphold their state. According to Machiavelli, in his book The Prince, this includes taking actions that are not favored by the majority. Though Machiavelli was born on May 3rd, 1469 and only wrote his book in 1513, his ideas were so significant that they apply even to contemporary leaders. Angela Merkel, the chancellor of Germany, is facing situations that can either prove her strength as a leader or set the European Union on a road to destruction. On top of dealing with the major Greek debt crisis, she has been faced with the task of deciding how to handle the Syrian refugees. Using the examples and analysis provided by Machiavelli, Merkel’s best plan would be to pressure…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays