Preview

Machiavelli The Prince Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
230 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Machiavelli The Prince Analysis
This is a significant analysis of Niccolo Machiavelli’s book The Prince. This book explores multiple concepts on leadership and governance for a Prince to legislate on his road to success. Therefore, I will bring a compelling conclusion on how Russian President Vladimir Putin is a modern Machiavelli. To get a full understanding towards Niccolo Machiavelli’s political theory, we must first examine what’s managed to inspire his view of an ideal government. In the book, The Prince, Machiavelli introduces insightful claims on how the Roman Empire’s legitimacy brought a secure and stable society. In fact, presenting the Roman Empire’s platform helped the reader to thoroughly understand Machiavelli’s political theory regarding governance and the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Machiavelli was a Florentine man of many skills. He was a renowned politician, author, and philosopher during the Renaissance, whose views and opinions affect the way people still think today. The Prince is his most famous work and in it he essentially states that humans are “ungrateful, fickle, deceptive and deceiving”. For that reason, a leader should rule through fear rather than love. However, what Europeans needed during the 14th, 15th, and 16th centuries were compassionate rulers. They were already frightened and disunited during the middle ages, thus adding a fearful leader to the mix would not help citizens feel safer.…

    • 101 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Prince was written in the 1500’s by Niccolo Machiavelli, whom name became a synonym for crafty plotting. As noted, it is a political and social document, as relevant today as when it first appeared. Machiavelli’s work became thought of as a blueprint for dictators instead of a guide for efficient democratic government. The Prince does not give us all of Machiavelli’s political thinking; however, he devised this reading for the man who seeks power. It treated the most severe problem of Italy, its inferiority in political organization and military strength to nearby states like Spain and France and was addressed to princes like the Lorenzo “The Magnificent” Medici, to whom it was dedicated. As difficult as it was to read, I did not find…

    • 1617 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Even if his country was laid to ruin, Machiavelli would show great distain if its president were to promise to pardon his people to uphold his own consciousness then what is needed for the welfare of the nation. To process a kind heart is a grand gift, however it’s a weakness others will abuse making you open to manipulation from neighboring kings. Machiavelli argues that”… it is unnecessary for a prince to have all the good qualities I have enumerated, but it is very necessary to appear to have them.” To be able to truly rule over a land, you must be ruthless in your action, yet be cleaver to appear benevolent to avoid enemy ploys. This is a point Machiavelli points out as “Those who rely simply on the lion do not understand what they are…

    • 224 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Niccolio Machiavelli (Born May 3rd, 1469 – 1527 Florence, Italy.) His writings have been the source of dispute amongst scholars due to the ambiguity of his analogy of the ‘Nature of Politics” and the implication of morality. The Prince, has been criticised due to it’s seemingly amoral political suggestiveness, however after further scrutiny of other works such as The Discourses, one can argue that it was Machiavelli’s intention to infact imply a positive political morality. Therefore the question needs to be posed. Is Machiavelli a political amoralist? To successfully answer this it is essential to analyse his version of political structure to establish a possible bias. It would also be beneficial to discuss and compare another philosopher’s account to the nature of politics, and in this instance I have chosen the works of Plato in particular The Republic, establishing a comparison to define whom has the more convincing argument and why?…

    • 1559 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Machiavelli has a certain philosophy that I personally don't agree with. He believes that "the end justifies the means." In other words, as long as you reach your goal, everything that you did to get there is justified. It isn't right to not care about how many people you torture, or how many homes you destroy, as long as you get people to bow down to you and call you king.…

    • 340 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Machiavelli's The Prince

    • 1857 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Since the beginning of civilization man has continually been faced with the complexity of creating a peaceful and unified existence for all, without resistance or violence. People have been trying to develop a system of how to rule effectively while acting ethically and morally to avoid chaos and destruction. However, as history has shown us this has not been an easy endeavor and very few rulers have been able to accomplish this. "This leads us to a question that is in dispute: Is it better to be loved than feared, or vice versa?" (Machiavelli, 51) An effective ruler would be one that relies upon fear without hatred, rather than love, as described by Niccolo Machiavelli in his book The Prince.…

    • 1857 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Machiavelli's The Prince

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Machiavelli's views have been misinterpreted since his book was first written, people take him in the wrong way, and are offended by what he says. Careless readers take him in a completely wrong way, such as they think that he believes that the end justifies the means, that a leader should lie to the people, and that a ruler has to rule with force. In actuality, Machiavelli means no such thing, he says that there are times when the common good outweighs the means, and the morality of a rulers actions. He also says that you cannot be loved by everyone, so try to be loved and feared at the same time, but of the two, choose to be feared. The Prince is considered to be one of the most important of nonfiction literature written in the history of mankind.…

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    “If you have to make a choice, to be feared is much safer than to be loved” (46). Niccolò Machiavelli declared this in The Prince while explaining how to be an extraordinary leader. If leaders are feared they will be respected by their people and other countries, thus keeping justice and maintaining control.…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato and Machiavelli, both take into account in their writings the power of the people in society, however, both have different ways of dealing with this unchecked power. Plato wants to establish a society, based upon his concept of logos that there is some forms of eternal common good, that need to be followed, so he wants to set up a Philosopher King, instead of a democracy. Machiavelli points out that regardless of the system in place the individual in charge needs to pay attention to the opinions of the people, adapting his conduct based upon the changing of this opinion. Machiavelli does not believe in some eternal truth on how to govern, but rather different scenarios and different people in similar situations as others may require differents…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Being “Machiavellian” is considered being pessimistic, cruel, and unvirtuous. While many history scholars claim that the label has gained a better association over the years, others believe that it still has the same bad meaning. The Prince, by Niccoló Machiavelli, provides many examples as to how the term, “Machiavellian”, has a negative connotation.…

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Good and bad princes are typically easily distinguishable, regardless of the time period from which they rule. For today’s rulers, we tend to gravitate towards leaders that we like or leaders who are popular. Standards for rulers have changed over time, but in the middle ages rulers were judged by a very strict set of criteria in which rulers were meant to be feared by all and loved by none. Kings and Princes of the middle ages were not necessarily popular as they are today. Instead, they strived to be competitive and feared. Niccolo Machiavelli wrote a series of works regarding the guidelines that princes were to follow in order to be successful rulers. He gives examples of both successful and unsuccessful princes and greatly details…

    • 1290 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    When looking back at what has become of modern western civilization, one would find that the circumstances of the earliest generations of rulers to be quite like the circumstances of those unstable, “barbaric” developing nations. When carefully observing this, one would find those nations typically stabilize after the rise of strong personalities and entities who can assert their dominance in a state of turmoil. As once stated by the 14th-century sociologist Ibn Khaldun in one of his most prized works, The Muqaddimah: An Introduction to History, he claims, “The term of life of a dynasty does not normally exceed three generations. For in the first generation are still preserved the characteristic features of rough, uncivilized rural life, such…

    • 1745 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    It has become apparent today that a significant majority of people whom reside among the many modern democracies here on the western hemisphere of world are rather very ignorant in the difficulties of nation building and the effort consuming process of developing effective governance in turbulent and chaotic circumstances. We often find that that significant majority that reside among us to be blinded by their first-world conditions, arrogantly pass judgement, carrying views and perceptions of contempt when given a window into the plight of those residing in developing nations, whether through the narrow-minded narratives peddled by various mainstream voices of pseudo-intellectuals or though the means of atrocious click-bait headlines in an…

    • 1767 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. When Machiavelli discusses that there are two kinds of combat, one with laws and one with force, what he is really talking about is that for a prince to be successful he must learn how to manage both. Machiavelli uses the lion and the fox example in order to make a metaphor out of the entire situation. A fox is cunning and smart and is therefore immune to traps. However, a fox cannot defend itself against a larger and more powerful animal such as a wolf — that’s where the lion comes in. A lion is not going to be as nimble and sly as a fox would be but it has the brute strength to strike fear into the animal kingdom. So how does this apply to politics? According to Machiavelli, the idea of using laws come naturally to men, for we are the…

    • 1064 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I would like to start form a short summary on the book “The Prnice”, which contains 26 parts. When N. Machiavelli wrote that book, he addressed it to the prince. So, this book is not similar to other books from this genre. N. Machiavelli wanted to say to the ruler of the country or state how he ought to rule it. He, also, provided some useful advice and added examples. Moreover, he wrote how to make the whole nation respect the head of the country and those parts are very useful, not only for the rulers, but also for the majority of people. However, there are some disadvantages of this book. First of all, the author never ruled the country, that is, some of his recommendations might be wrong. Secondly, every ruler has his own ideas about the way how to rule the country. Because he knows what happens inside the country. In one review on that book was written: “As I read it, I couldn 't help wondering which of our own leaders have read it and which have not. The first part of the book tells us about different kinds of state, how to deal with trouble in them and how to conquer them successfully.”1…

    • 1542 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays