This rhetorical question is found in the second paragraph of Thoreau's first part to his essay. In this paragraph Thoreau advocates against the American government and lists multiple of its faults for his readers, in order to push his point that the government does not do the job it is assigned to perform. Furthermore, Thoreau also tries to get the reader to come to the conclusion that the country would be better without the government in place. Thoreau places this rhetorical question in the beginning of the paragraph in order to demean the government prior to making his central argument. He essentially takes a swat at the entire government saying that it is nothing but a tradition that is losing its honor.…
Human law and government are subordinate and antagonists to each other. Thoreau proposes that in an instance when each odd is against one another, an individual must choose their own moral path instead of the government path if necessary. Thoreau explains that people are not put in this world to make it a better place to live in, rather than to simply live it. He then describes that it is not man’s duty to devote himself to the moral wrong. It is man’s duty to avoid the moral wrong. For instance, if the government tells you to either kill your family members or be sent to jail, it is your duty to obey your conscience. Furthermore, Thoreau explains that the majority is not always correct either and thus, do not accurately determine justice. Although government has a place in human existence, man must eventually follow his own moral decisions and disregard human…
Henry David Thoreau, was an unconventional thinker who expressed his ideas about major issues such as war, slavery, wealth, taxes, friendship, vegetarianism, and the lessons that nature can teach. Thoreau was an important transcendentalist writer in the early nineteenth century. During the Mexican American war, Thoreau refused to pay a poll tax and while he was in a protest against slavery, he was arrested. He was thrown into jail for one night and later writes about how the government could be better. I agree that Thoreau’s ideas about how a government should be more better is a excellent postulation and I would further add the government today in the twenty first century still hasn’t even changed at all.…
Thoreau immediately attacks the American government as weak and useless in the opening paragraphs of his essay. Thoreau states that "This American government is a sort of wooden gun to the people themselves; and, if ever they should use it in earnest as a real one against each other, it will surely split" (1). This metaphor makes the complex idea that the all-powerful American government is actually feeble and fragile, because everyone knows that…
Thoreau begins his essay by arguing that the government intervenes too much and it would be better if they were not involved at all. He believes men are too absent minded and do whatever the government says without thinking about their morals. Those who listen and follow the government are not wise and do not trust their conscience.…
4. Thoreau states that, “no government would be best”. However, as a citizen what does he call for at once? Why?…
Rebellion is a big difference between the two writings. Thoreau wants a world without government and wants to achieve that with peaceful rebellion. “It will not be worth the while to accumulate property; that would be sure to go again. You must hire or squat somewhere, and raise but…
Thoreau's utopian government is one, which enforces very few parameters. "I heartily accept the motto, 'That government is best which governs least'" "I believe--'That government is best which governs not at all'; and when men are prepared for it, that will be the kind of government which they will have " (On Duty of Civil Disobedience.) Thoreau makes it clear that all men should oppose every unjust law or guideline, which contradicts the conscience within each citizen who is under the government's control.…
This passage is a very powerful one because Thoreau does not badger the government. Instead of saying that the government should change one thing into another thing he suggests that the government should re-evaluate something that needs change, and asks the government officials to take other viewpoints into consideration. In modern times, people have shown how uneducated are by having the audacity to say things like our country would be better off without a government. When people make statements like this, or take a similar approach towards a topic, they show how truly uneducated they are. Without a government, our country would be in complete havoc and turmoil. The mindsets of people in the 1500’s were completely different to the mindsets of people now. In today’s world, people have become accustomed to a society that is filled with drama and sarcasm. Because of this, people are constantly ridiculed and have learned to ignore the opinions of others. In the 1500’s the people wouldn’t make unrealistic statements because they didn’t want their opinion being made a joke, and would feel both humiliated and embarrassed if they were ridiculed by their…
-Thoreau prefers a “neutral” government, but he does not mean for the government to be set aside. Rather than that he “wants” a better government.…
Thoreau, a writer at the time, observed the problems in the complexity of the government democracy. Similar democracy and governments in the past failed because the government expanded and grew overgrown in its complexity that it trapped itself in its own system. The ever-expanding democracy was beginning to show signs of possibly committing similar mistakes that the governments before them fatally committed as well. Thoreau bashed the government for growing too expansive in their democracy, trapping itself in superficial policies and for purposely using the citizens of the United States. The issue between the citizens and government never resolved, the concept of expanding democracy has not changed over time.…
with an illuminating promise (Thoreau, “Economy,” 4) . The promise to have property (terra nullius), and in that property, is the tabula rasa of man’s new beginnings. Yet that liberty came at the further expense of aboriginal, black, and enviromental freedom. The flame from liberty’s chalice casts its lawful protection of those considered citizens, and in that, disavows certain men from that sense of having security: “[a] slave and prisoner of his own [private] opinion of himself” (4). The material consciousnesses of men sublates and alienates man from his/her self-development. The alienating practices of patriotism as a form of hegemonic social control estranged man from his neighbours. S/he must balance between the necessity of “commerce…
he wrote in such text that covered all aspects of life. He united man and nature as one. He wrote about the beauty of everything. I believe that everything was meant to be on this earth for a reason and there is always beauty in everything you just need to look harder. Nature its meaning and value comprises one of the most pervasive themes in Thoreau's writings, expressed through both painstaking detail and broad generalization. Like Emerson, Thoreau saw an intimate and specific familiarity with the reality of nature as vital to understanding higher truth. Thoreau's transcendental quest toward the universal drew him to immerse himself in nature at Walden Pond from 1845 to 1847. It led him to observe the natural world closely in order ultimately…
In Civil Disobedience, Thoreau expresses his strong disapproval of the American government. He even makes the following statement: "the best government is the one that governs the least." This quote shows us that Thoreau really does have a strong dislike for the government and that he will rebel against it. Thoreau does in fact rebel against the government by not paying his taxes. This causes him to suffer one night in jail. In his isolation, he is able to think, and concludes that he would rather be in jail than out in the real world.…
In his opening paragraph, he declares the bold and audacious statements: ‘[...] government is best which governs least [...]’ (lines 1-2) followed by, ‘[...] government is best which governs not at all [...]’ (line 4). Immediately the audience is—very clearly—exposed to his argument, which has an immense amount of force behind it. This is vital for Thoreau’s argument, as throughout his essay the audience hears a very strong and passionate voice, urging them to feel the same way about the topic, and that they too have been wronged by the government. Alongside Thoreau’s very forceful and powerful tone, a candid and critical tone is present. ‘This American government—what is it but a tradition, though a recent one, endeavoring to transmit itself unimpaired to posterity, but each instant losing some of its integrity?’ (lines 18-20). This very prominent line denounces the American government’s rectitude, implying that its partiality has reached to the point where it is just a pattern, and continued to increasingly execute unequitable behaviour. Though his attitude sounds negative and pessimistic, Thoreau does make a petition for action from society with an encouraging tone. ‘[...] I ask for, not at once no government, but at once a better government. Let every man make known what kind of government would command his respect, and that will be one step toward obtaining it...’ (lines 45-48). Here, Thoreau uses ethos, as he knows that every man (and woman) wants to be respected, which then builds motivation for the people to take action against the current unjust government instead of heeding to its indoctrinated…