Analyzing Plato's Apology Essay
Death is one of the most discussed topics that has always risen a lot of doubt and concerns . Many philosophers and writers, through the centuries, have tried to find a definition or a reason for this mysterious and inevitable event. Analyzing Plato’s Apology, he seemed to have a positive view about death. He claimed that death is a “state of nothingness and utter unconsciousness”; in fact, he compared death with the act of sleeping. But since death is more deep and irreversible, humans cannot be bothered by dreams or thought because they’re dead, whereas this could happen while they’re sleeping. So death is a state of relaxing for the soul and for this motivation he considered death as a conquer for human’s life. He also pointed out another
…show more content…
argument for which death could be considered a satisfactory goal. He stated that death is also a journey where humans can joined a better place undisturbed where all Gods live. If all human’s being went there, he could have the possibility to talk to the divinities and examine in depth the “true and false knowledge”. This means that for him, death could be a chance to become wiser and improve his studying about life and death.
This point of view is also evoked in the soliloquy “To be or not to be” by William Shakespeare.
In fact, he opposes death and life as two states of being. For Hamlet, living is a passive state because humans are over thinking and are not capable to take a strict decision. Otherwise, death is an active state because killing oneself is a way of taking action. So he complained humans and himself because they are not so brave as they wish. According to what he claimed, death is something desirable because humanity is not influenced anymore by the fear of living.
Therefore, this will is shared by Hamlet and Plato. They both discuss about death and give their own opinion. They agree with the comparison between death and act of sleeping. These conditions are similar, in the opinion of the authors, because of the lack of consciousness. As a consequence, men are attracted by a sense of curiosity and allurement, but these feelings are shared with two opposite reactions.
Hamlet compared the act of sleeping with death, but for Hamlet these states have two completely different consequences: when someone sleep, he/she can be bothered by his/her dreams and also by the thought of death. This reflection, contrary to the Plato’s believing, it’s a frightening thought because humans don’t know what they could expect after death and life could be worse than the previous one. Meanwhile Plato is fascinated by death and actually he wish he could join the other world as soon as
possible.
In my opinion, death is something that no one can avoid and even if you keep thinking about it, life is not going to change or be longer. For this reason I think that life should be experienced all the way without any regret, but at the same time being aware of our limits. Death shouldn’t be considered a limit of one’s life, but a goal that everyone reaches at the end of our life as a reward of our efforts. It’s not the end of everything, because as long as we have lived a life full of happiness and satisfactions and we don’t have anything to complain, death will be just the last fundamental step of our path.
argument for which death could be considered a satisfactory goal. He stated that death is also a journey where humans can joined a better place undisturbed where all Gods live. If all human’s being went there, he could have the possibility to talk to the divinities and examine in depth the “true and false knowledge”. This means that for him, death could be a chance to become wiser and improve his studying about life and death.
This point of view is also evoked in the soliloquy “To be or not to be” by William Shakespeare.
In fact, he opposes death and life as two states of being. For Hamlet, living is a passive state because humans are over thinking and are not capable to take a strict decision. Otherwise, death is an active state because killing oneself is a way of taking action. So he complained humans and himself because they are not so brave as they wish. According to what he claimed, death is something desirable because humanity is not influenced anymore by the fear of living.
Therefore, this will is shared by Hamlet and Plato. They both discuss about death and give their own opinion. They agree with the comparison between death and act of sleeping. These conditions are similar, in the opinion of the authors, because of the lack of consciousness. As a consequence, men are attracted by a sense of curiosity and allurement, but these feelings are shared with two opposite reactions.
Hamlet compared the act of sleeping with death, but for Hamlet these states have two completely different consequences: when someone sleep, he/she can be bothered by his/her dreams and also by the thought of death. This reflection, contrary to the Plato’s believing, it’s a frightening thought because humans don’t know what they could expect after death and life could be worse than the previous one. Meanwhile Plato is fascinated by death and actually he wish he could join the other world as soon as
possible.
In my opinion, death is something that no one can avoid and even if you keep thinking about it, life is not going to change or be longer. For this reason I think that life should be experienced all the way without any regret, but at the same time being aware of our limits. Death shouldn’t be considered a limit of one’s life, but a goal that everyone reaches at the end of our life as a reward of our efforts. It’s not the end of everything, because as long as we have lived a life full of happiness and satisfactions and we don’t have anything to complain, death will be just the last fundamental step of our path.