Preview

Anarchy: Anarchism and Purely Anarchist Revolution

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1221 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Anarchy: Anarchism and Purely Anarchist Revolution
Anarchism, more than anything else, is about the efforts of millions of revolutionaries changing the world in the last two centuries.
Here we will discuss some of the high points of this movement, all of them of a profoundly anti-capitalist nature.

Anarchism is about radically changing the world, not just making the present system less inhuman by encouraging the anarchistic tendencies within it to grow and develop. While no purely anarchist revolution has taken place yet, there have been numerous ones with a highly anarchist character and level of participation. And while these have all been destroyed, in each case it has been at the hands of outside force brought against them (backed either by Communists or Capitalists), not because of any internal problems in anarchism itself. These revolutions, despite their failure to survive in the face of overwhelming force, have been both an inspiration for anarchists and proof that anarchism is a viable social theory and can be practised on a large scale.

What these revolutions share is the fact they are, to use Proudhon's term, a "revolution from below" -- they were examples of
"collective activity, of popular spontaneity." It is only a transformation of society from the bottom up by the action of the oppressed themselves that can create a free society. As Proudhon asked, "[w]hat serious and lasting Revolution was not made from below, by the people?" For this reason an anarchist is a "revolutionary from below." Thus the social revolutions and mass movements we discuss in this section are examples of popular self-activity and self-liberation (as Proudhon put it in
1848, "the proletariat must emancipate itself"). [quoted by George Woodcock, Pierre-Joseph Proudhon: A Biography, p.
143 and p. 125] All anarchists echo Proudhon's idea of revolutionary change from below, the creation of a new society by the actions of the oppressed themselves. Bakunin, for example, argued that anarchists are "foes . . . of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Revolutions tend to have a negative connotation to them, seeming bloody and fighting against logic. However, revolutions can be a positive thing and they sometimes are such as the American Revolution, but revolutions only tend to be positive things when you have the correct person who is in charge to manage everything that happens. In Benito Cereno by Melville, Into the Wild by Krakauer, and The Heroic Slave by Douglass the characters become the people leaders of their respective rebellions. Although their success varies, Chris, Babo, and Madison all have the capability to rebel because the intelligence that they display throughout their active rebellions, which are isolated from society.…

    • 1322 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    all forms of human poverty and all forms of human life. And yet the same revolutionary…

    • 1471 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    experience a lot of change though the ideals from the revolution still guided some to seek…

    • 901 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The French Revolution, the 1848 Women's Suffrage movement, and Shay’s Rebellion are all prime examples of people unifying to fix issues they see in their lives. Oscar Wilde claims that progress is made through rebellion and disobedience, in the 21st century the latter is prominent. Historically social progress has been made through group rebellion and occasionally violence, however following the civil war, that has changed. Progress can no longer be endorsed factionally, it is necessary instead for an individual to make their mark and allow reform to follow them like a trend. To fully understand the idea of individually led progress it is important, initially, to understand the relevance of trends and the different categories they subject themselves…

    • 1372 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    One core belief of anarchism is Anti-statism. This is the opposition to state intervention into personal, social and economic affairs. Anarchists believe that authority is an offense against the principles of liberty and equality and that we are free autonomous creatures who should treat each other with…

    • 964 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “I must make the important distinction between the rebel and the revolutionary,” says Dr. Rollo May, one of the most influential American existential psychologist among society, in an excerpt titled, “The Humanity of the Rebel” from his prominent book, Power and Innocence. Rollo May vividly highlights the enduring opposites of the rebel and the revolutionary amongst a society battling to protect conventional norms and traditions. As reasoning, optimistic human beings, many struggle to take the moral stand necessary against injustice in the world. Humans, however, embody this central constituent to be aware of injustice and take necessary, primary action, in the form of “rudimentary anger.” This action against injustice evolves into two forms – the revolutionary and the rebel. May states that the revolutionary desires “external” change in politics, like overthrowing a government leader and replacing him/her. The rebel, however, has an everlasting persistence to break from the conventional views of society, to “oppose authority,” impacting people internally, whether emotions or mindsets, rather than push for physical, or visible change. Revolutionaries have an underlying lust for power, while rebels share their power to benefit society and protect his/her logical and spiritual integrity; rebels desire to be a respected individual. Civilization, therefore, is defined by the actions and the shared power of the rebel that is sparked by rebellion like Prometheus. May further emphasizes that rebels are the key to the “first flower,” the survival of society for thousands of years because they shake the “rigid order of civilization;” rebels go against the status quo. Rebels must battle consciousness, realizing the responsibility, and struggle to make difficult, worthwhile decisions. A rebel, however, struggles with the idea as God(s) as the one(s) who keep men conventional and in line; Gods are, however, at the same time human’s motivation for…

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A Revolution can either fail or succeed , many revolutions succeeded due to overthrowing their presidents , and kings and over all important people in that current era . For Example , The people of Nicaragua suffered a huge impact of oppression that led to the development of domination against the Sandinistas and a Revolution that impacted not only Nicaraguan people but also Latin American people with political and social effects .…

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    proletariat (467). Marx except that communism should help the proletariat unite to abolish the rule of the…

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Compare and Contrast the 'anarchism ' or Chomsky and Bookchin. Is it accurate to label them anarchists?…

    • 1641 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Revolution is found in any state founded on false ideas of justice; democracy is more stable than oligarchies against revolution. Some common causes include dissent over the favoring of a particular class and a lack of middle-class which causes feuds between rich and poor. In democracies, revolution can be caused when the rich are persecuted or when politicians compete to gain the favor of the populace. In oligarchies, revolution is caused by the common people rebelling against oppression. Oligarchies are usually destroyed from within, when a new oligarchy is created within the original.…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    This basically means that they created a system that deems it necessary to create a permanent body of the “rich and well-born” to check the “imprudence” of democracy. This is exactly what anarchism fights against. Anarchist understands that the democracy we live in isn’t a true democracy. Democracy is a system of government by the whole population or all eligible members. This is what the anarchist fight for. They fight for a democracy where not only does majority rule, but also the minority isn’t neglected. Anarchist in the terms of protest differs greatly from pacifism. While they ultimately have similar goals anarchists works directly against the political institution while pacifism works around it. In terms of legitimacy, anarchist acts as if those in power don’t exist. They don’t make demands because by making demands they recognize those in power. They blatantly break laws that they don’t agree…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    This is reminiscent of Karl Marx in ways of class power, in The Manifesto of Class Struggle, and only helping…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Seizing Power In Russia

    • 173 Words
    • 1 Page

    In the case of Russia, seizing power in an erratic movement was possible but in the case of Western Europe, continuous revolution is vital to transfer power from one class to another as the civil society is settled in the latter…

    • 173 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are many branches within Anarchism just as there are to any political theory or religion, a few of them being mutualism, collectivist anarchism, individualist anarchism, anarchist communism, anarcho-syndicalism, green anarchism, and although many don't consider in a form of anarchism, anarcho-capitalism. Although anarchism has only existed as a…

    • 1451 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Merton suggests that by the time people reach the mode of rebellion, they have completely rejected the story that everybody in society can achieve success and have loomed into a rebellious state. They neither trust the valued cultural ends nor the legitimate societal means used to reach success. Instead, these people replace such ideas with irrational objectives to include the violent overthrow of the system altogether (Akers, 2000, p.…

    • 167 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays

Related Topics