Preview

Anatomy Of A Verdict Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
504 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Anatomy Of A Verdict Analysis
D. Graham Burnette gave fantastic insight into the logistics and feelings of a jury sentencing in his article, Anatomy of a Verdict. Throughout the article he explained just how hard it can be for a jury to sentence someone for a large crime. As he stated, a jury is something akin to, “foot soldiers of justice” (Burnette 2001), which conjures up the image of brave people going off to take on a daunting duty. In many ways, that’s exactly what it is for a real jury, no matter what the case. It can be emotionally, and sometimes physically draining to sit in a deliberations room for hours at a time, discussing at length a fellow human beings future.
During the description of the cross examination, I found it interesting how Burnette wanted the prosecution to lose, simply because of the over zealous reenactment of how the murder went. It’s interesting to see how quickly ideas can change, simply because one of the teams represents itself in an unflattering manner. I’m curious as to how the jury would have seen the cross examiner if he hadn’t put forth such a display, and whether or not that would have greatly impacted the results of the case.
Something I found interesting, was the fact
…show more content…
They had all heard the same case, but due to the vast differences in their personal lives, they had all come to different conclusions. With two very strong willed and different individuals arguing, I found it surprising that they had managed to reach a point in which they decided a compromise was best. The idea of compromise, however, brought something completely different into account, the relationship of law and justice. The distinction between the two is very interesting, what really draws the line between the two? Does justice appeal more to emotion and law more to logistics? If that’s the case then how can someone reasonably mix the two in order to get a fair punishment if one is

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Australian legal system doesn't deliver justice equally for all Australians. In this essay, the issues of the relationship between laws to ethics, morals and values, access to the legal system and issues of fairness in the law will be discussed. There are several relevant examples that have influenced the viewpoint of this essay. The case of Dame Elizabeth Butler-Sloss, the case of Amy vs Adam (www.lawcouncil.asn.au) and the case of Brendan Dassey.…

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The seventh step is postverdict motions. This is where the defense can file motions in behalf of the defendant. The defense can argue that the jurors could not have possible found the defendant guilty from the evidence…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Joe Cinque - Law

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The justice system is divided between providing a punishment or a rehabilitation sentence. Varied opinions are voiced throughout the novel, yet the court system…

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    By not producing results that correlate with the outcome, plea bargaining weakens the validity of the criminal justice system. Validity or legitimacy is a very important characteristic of the legal system’s effectiveness. The view of the legal system is determined considerably on whether or not the system operates in harmony with basic rules of procedural fairness, for example treating cases alike or allowing parties an opportunity to be heard. Nevertheless, a system that fails to function under such rules will lose their…

    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Within the criminal trial process, natural tensions ordinarily occur between all participants and procedures of which the system operates, for example Investigation, Trial and Sentencing are three key processes within the criminal justice system that require an appropriate amount of discretion in order to properly and lawfully achieve justice.…

    • 453 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Christie expresses that these conflicts are eliminated from the involved parties, rather than being used to benefit the individuals. “Conflicts might kill, but too little of it might paralyze.” (Christie, 1977, pg. 9) Christie presents an example of a non-western mechanism for conflict resolving, where both parties had direct participation of their own conflict resolution, while other individuals (i.e. relatives, friends and judges) would have little involvement and did not attempt to take over the case (Christie, 1977). Christie demonstrates that the legal procedure of such conflicts are being dissociated from their owners in which continues to remain. The conflicts are repressed in such a manner where there is no attention given to the victim, revolving the concentrated attention to the background of the criminal (Christie, 1977, pg. 11). He elevates by alleging that this continuous process has been recognized to be detrimental to all of society. The author, Nils Christie, is reasonable for making these declarations. Conflicts are the property of those whom had initiated them; therefore the property of the conflict should be taken out from the legal professionals to be restituted to those established it.…

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    If life truly is what you or we the people make it than we are all guilty of negligence and selfish immaturity. The existence of our civil liberty is under constant threat and that is something that should never be allowed to go on with such neglect. Laws should not only protect the rights, freedoms, and safety of the people but also should enhance the civil liberty of those who are expected to uphold such laws. This is why we have a jury and this is why the jury possesses the power of responsibility to protect civil liberty at all costs. The handbook for trial jurors serving in the United States District Courts clearly states and touches on the importance of jury service. It says that jurors maintain a vital role in our justice system and the protection of our rights and liberties is largely achieved through the teamwork of judge and jury who, working together in a common effort, put into practice the principles of our great heritage of freedom. It also goes on to say the judge determines the law to be applied in the case while the jury decides the facts. Thus, in a very important way, jurors become a part of the court itself. Jurors must be men and women possessed of sound judgment, absolute honesty, and a complete sense of fairness. Jury service is a high duty of citizenship. Jurors aid in the maintenance of law and order and uphold justice among their fellow citizens. In addition to determining and adjusting property rights, jurors may also be asked to decide questions involving a crime for which a person may be fined, placed on probation, or confined in prison. In a very real sense, therefore, the people must rely upon jurors…

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Brief Summary

    • 300 Words
    • 1 Page

    In Bernhardt’s analysis, she starts off her essay strong by stating how important Frederick Douglass’s speech was. In her first paragraph, Bernhardt shows readers that Frederick Douglass was credible by stating how he himself was part of the slave trade. Bernhardt’s thesis in her first paragraph that drives the rest of her essay is how she states that, “Fredrick was a huge part of the abolitionist movement,” and that, “Fredrick wanted to show his aversion to slavery and his passionate dedication to see it end.”…

    • 300 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Jury Trial Analysis Paper

    • 1200 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In this paper I will provide an analysis of a jury trial; my analysis will focus on the right of the defendant. I will articulate how a defendant 's rights at trial can be assured when it comes to The defendant’s right to a speedy trial, the defendant’s right to an impartial judge and the defendant’s right to an impartial jury.…

    • 1200 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many say that the trial by jury is one of our sacred cows – meaning something that people don’t like to criticize- but many state that if we’d long had trial by judge in criminal cases and were to suggest that his reasoned and professional judgment as to facts and inferences should be replaced by the blanket verdict of pretty well any twelve men and women cramped together for a period of time the one would rightfully find this unjust. The role of the jury service is to encourage self-governance and civil participation, the ones who benefit from the jury service are ordinary citizens. What is important about the jury system is that it ensures the people ultimate control in the legislative and executive branch. Citizens can participate in the legislative and executive branches by exercising their right to vote, the only way that they can participate in the judicial branch of government is because the jury service has special role. The jury system allows ordinary citizens to participate in a government judicial process. They have the ultimate control in the legislative and executive branches.…

    • 588 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Trial By Jury

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages

    It isn’t arduous to see why some may question the efficiency of trial by jury and whether it should, and is able to, continue to discover innocence or guilt. Regarding the trial of Vicky Pryce, the failure of the jury within the hearing conjured ridicule and disdain from the judge and the media. The case deeply unsettled the trust of many in the system. The eight women and four men were dismissed after illustrating “fundamental deficits of understanding” (Jacobson, Hunter & Kirby, 2015, p. 55). Their profuse questions for the judge were deemed as unintelligent and unnecessary and so a costly re-trial was required. Consequently, this ordeal provoked a stronger desire for the abolition of trial by jury, to be replaced by a single judge as a more…

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A directed verdict will only benefit the defendant and will not benefit the government. This is where a trial is taking place and the trial judge will award, judgment toward the defendant. Therefore, the judgment is based on the fact that the prosecution has failed to provide the minimum amount of evidence needed to prove that the defendant committed the crime in question ("Directed Verdict"). Consequently, what has happened is the judge is saying that no reasonable jury could or would support a conviction, in the plaintiff’s favor, in the case.…

    • 194 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Legal vs, Justice

    • 1025 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The two words just and legal have been used interchangeably in today's society and we have forgotten the extreme amount of separation between the two words' meanings. I am going to reflect on the different meanings of what is just verses what is legal and why it is dangerous to define them as one and the same. Many similarities can be made between the two words' meanings stemming from the fact that both pertain to the justice system and to the upholding of morality. The two separate in their definitions because legal does not show evenness on an issue and the legality of something takes no account of its fairness and equality. Whereas, if something is just, it is not because it is legal but because it is fair and two sided. These two sides of the comparison show how similar just and legal have become, yet they also maintain much of their own identities. In the next few pages, I will juxtapose these two words and try to show how their differences must not be overtaken by their similarities.…

    • 1025 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cross-examination is a very important process in summary trial. The main object of cross-examination is to find the truth and defection of falsehood in human testimony. It is design to destroy or weaken the force of evidence a witness has already given in person or elicit something into your favour which he has not stated to discredit him by showing object of cross-examination from a litigious standpoint.…

    • 1982 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The method of justice is the turn of phrase used by Lundstedt to denote traditional legal science, (derived from the traditional method of natural law), which holds that human beings are persons endowed with legal rights and duties. He was of the view that the term “right” and other metaphysical concepts employed by traditional legal science, were all illusory concepts ; that they were naught else but an intellectual play with expressions of feeling - as if something real were designated thereby. Such concepts could not be used because they did not refer to any natural facts - therefore the terms were devoid of any conceptual meaning.…

    • 1404 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays