Preview

Role Of Plea Bargaining In The Criminal Justice System

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
623 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Role Of Plea Bargaining In The Criminal Justice System
Process
Plea bargaining is the essence of the criminal justice system, and it is the process in which a defendant pleads guilty to a criminal charge in order to receive some consideration from the state. There are various types of plea bargaining deals that defendants may accept, which include charge bargaining, count bargaining, and sentence bargaining. Charge bargaining requires the defendant to plead guilty to a less serious crime than the one originally charged with. Count bargaining requires the defendant to plead guilty to partial charges or counts, but not all of the charges presented against them. Lastly, sentence bargaining requires the defendant to plead guilty in exchange for leniency in sentencing.
The prosecutor, the defendant, and the judge are all involved in the plea bargaining process. Typically, the process begins with the prosecutor making an offer. The defense lawyer, with minimal or no investigation of the case, discusses the plea bargain with their client, who then accepts or declines the offer. At the hearing, the court confirms with the defendant that they have accepted the plea bargain freely and voluntarily. Once the defendant confirms with the court, the court accepts the plea and the defendant is charged.
…show more content…
By not producing results that correlate with the outcome, plea bargaining weakens the validity of the criminal justice system. Validity or legitimacy is a very important characteristic of the legal system’s effectiveness. The view of the legal system is determined considerably on whether or not the system operates in harmony with basic rules of procedural fairness, for example treating cases alike or allowing parties an opportunity to be heard. Nevertheless, a system that fails to function under such rules will lose their

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Cole, Plea-bargaining is negotiating a settlement between the prosecutor and the defense attorney, that would exchange a guilty plea for a lighter sentence.. Generally if the prosecutor is willing to lower the sentence, the defense will accept and plea guilty to the crime he or she was accused of. Roughly thirty-five years ago, plea-bargaining was not discussed outside of the courtroom. It was a “secret” of the court and done behind closed doors. Now, people know what plea-bargaining is, and is now a very controversial subject in society. There are positives and negative aspects of plea-bargaining in the case of Councilman…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plea Bargainig CJA224

    • 1189 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In this essay it will discuss the following: Define plea bargaining, distinguish between charge bargaining and sentence bargaining, compare and contrast the advantages and disadvantages of plea bargaining, and last but least describe how plea bargaining reflects or thwarts the crime control and due process models of criminal justice.…

    • 1189 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    When it comes to plea bargaining, there are two different types that can be offered to the defendant by the prosecutor: sentence bargaining and charge bargaining. Sentence bargaining is when the accused is informed of what the sentence will be with a guilty plea and is useful in helping the prosecutor to obtain a conviction by offering the minimum, instead of the maximum sentence for the charge. If the defendant is facing serious charges and does not want to chance receiving a maximum sentence during trial, they may enter a guilty plea in order to serve the least amount of time possible. Charge bargaining is when the prosecutor offers to either charge the accused with a lesser charge, or to reduce the number of charges that have been filed against him/her, in exchange for a guilty plea. For example, if the defendant is charged with a DUI, driving with an expired license, and driving with expired…

    • 1298 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Some pros of plea bargain is, creating a less over-crowed, over-whelmed system by taking simple cases away. With taking smaller cases away the prosecutors will have few trials to deal with and they will be more effective to the major cases they have. Another positive thing is that not matter if…

    • 177 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A plea bargain is a negotiation between the defendant and their attorney on one side, and the crown prosecutor on the other side. A plea bargain may give the defendant a lightened sentence, in exchange for either confessing to some crimes, or giving information that is related to the offence, for example, the location of stolen goods or the names and locations of other participants, as well as their part in the offence.…

    • 3099 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The "tough on crime" side mighht say that they are not in favor of the plea-bargaining system for the fact that it lets criminals get away with a lesser charge and lighter sentence which many would say isn’t fair to the victim. Those who want to protect due process rights on the other hand would rule in favor of the plea-bargaining system because it gives the people a chance at lesser sentence which they would say protects the people from the abuse of the justice system. All in all the plea-bargaining system has its pros and cons. All roles in the court system have the chance to benefit when plea-bargaining is used over the option of going to trial. Well some critics will stand by their reason that they believe plea-bargaining allows criminals to get away with their crimes due to the possibility of lighter sentencing, Others would refer to the positives a plea-bargain brings for example the victims chance to receive retribution right away without having to waste time with a long drawn out…

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The question we are debating today is whether or not plea-bargaining undermines the Criminal justice system? The job of the Criminal justice system is to protect the citizens of the United States. How are we protecting them if we give criminals shorter sentences than they deserve? When we plea bargain we release more criminals back into the streets and put citizens of the United States' safety at risk. A plea bargain is an agreement in a criminal case in which a prosecutor and a defendant arrange to settle the case against the defendant. The United states department of justice's mission statement reads: To enforce the law and defend the interests of the United States according to the law; to ensure public safety against threats foreign and domestic; to provide federal leadership in preventing and controlling crime; to seek just punishment for those guilty of unlawful behavior; and to ensure fair and impartial administration of justice for all Americans. This statement is being undermined because not…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Using the fairness and justice decision-making process it made me decide that the use of plea bargaining was unethical; due to the fact that it was not fair that criminals who have committed unlawful acts like rape, robbery, and numerous horrendous crimes were given leniency just because they are acknowledging they executed the offense. Stating your guilty doesn’t mean they reflected upon their actions and are ready to start a new leaf. They have instigated the felony and it is only right that they get the full consequence of their atrocity. Furthermore, what’s worse is that because of the pressure and fear of being convicted, the innocent plead guilty and the immoral run free and continue to disrupt the peace of the community. In conclusion, there is no fairness and justice when there is plea bargaining.…

    • 240 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plea-bargaining has been practiced in the criminal justice system for over 300 years. Controversial cases have brought plea bargains to the forefront and have created bias towards this practice. However, if plea bargains were not implemented, a chaotic and expensive justice system would be created. With such cases bringing a negative view to plea-bargaining, this research paper aims to show the positives and negatives of plea-bargaining. Critics of plea-bargaining believe that sentences demonstrate to be more lenient to the defendants, contributes to the issue of mass incarceration, and how the Crown persuades defendants into pleading guilty. Nevertheless, supporters of plea bargains find that plea deals are beginning to including the victims…

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Plea bargaining became common sometime after the Civil War. The proliferation of cases, in the federal courts, brought on by prohibition was instrumental in the institutionalization of plea bargaining. (Neubauer, 2002, p. 323) It was not until the sixties that plea bargaining became a topic of controversy. This controversy seems to stem from the fact that the name suggests that the courts are bargaining with criminals. But "much of what is characterized as 'plea bargaining ' often involves the assessment and reassessment of facts...." (Nasheri, 1998, p. 24) After examining all the facts the conclusion might be that there is just not…

    • 2149 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Whether or not it is possible to entirely eliminate plea bargaining in all its forms and varieties, I am not persuaded that it is desirable to do so. But I am no friend of plea bargaining in the unrestrained forms of it that are evident in the United States. In a nutshell, the normative position I shall advance is this: individuals charged with crimes who are willing to confess or plead guilty should be granted modest and fixed sentence discounts in exchange for doing so. Charge bargaining, and that which often accompanies and enables it, strategic overcharging, should be strongly discouraged. Trial penalties, that is, additional increments of punishment assigned to individuals who exercise their right to trial, should be prohibited. However,…

    • 212 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Plea bargaining is an essential tool used in the criminal justice system today.The process of plea bargaining usually begins before trial, and can involve a phone call between the prosecutor and the defense (Phelps & Cengage, 2006). Once the plea bargain is negotiated it would have to be approved by a judge in open court (Phelps & Cengage, 2006)With the amount of court proceedings that take place plea bargaining is a tool that can allow less cases on a judge’s…

    • 81 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    As Nataskie stated above, there is a place and a need for plea bargaining in our criminal justice system. Although it is true that plea bargaining gives a guilty person the opportunity to admit to their crime and accept the punishment for it, they are likely more motivated by the fact that plea bargaining involves the perpetrator receiving a reduced sentence of some sort. Another reason for continuing with plea bargaining, as a tool in the criminal justice system, is because often it affords the prosecutor the means necessary to get a lesser criminal to testify against a more significant criminal who otherwise might go free. Plea bargaining should maintain an active role in all justice systems regardless of whether they are local, state,…

    • 127 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Professionals in the criminal justice field have the discretion to make many ethical choices throughout their careers. These choices are so significant that their outcomes can determine the futures of those involved. An ethical choice that prosecutors have to make daily, revolves around plea bargaining. Plea bargains are negotiations for contracts between the prosecution and the defense in an attempt to get them to plead guilty ("Plea Bargain.”). The prosecutor offers to reduce the severity or the length of the defendant’s punishment in exchange for the defense’s agreement to plead guilty ("Plea Bargain."). Sometimes plea deals even require the defendant to testify against someone else, so that they can be convicted of a crime ("Plea Bargain.").…

    • 1813 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Prosecutors agree with the defendant plea of guilty and will decide on how much time the defendant will face. The disadvantaged of a plea bargaining is that no matter how loud a defendant cry to the judge, the jury can still charge the defendant with more time. The advantages of a plea bargaining makes the prosecution job much easier. The disadvantages is that some defendants show no sincere while pleading guilty which makes the prosecutors look into the case more to get all the facts and evidence to figure out if they should take the case to trial. Basically the advantages and disadvantages are the same because it 's the pros and cons of a plea bargaining. It is a plea to jury which gives defendants a second chance into getting their sentences cut short. When pleading guilty to a judge your plea have to be sincere, you must mean everything you state, and can also be able to give information on why and why not the jury should sentence you to serve less time. Asking for a plea bargaining is really like asking to convince the judge that whatever crime you did, you is sorry, and that you learned your lesson. Dealing with the system you have to show them that every word you mentioned you meant it. They have to feel some type of way to know that you are actually sorry and that you really want to do better. Help the system help you, they are only against you if you…

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays