Preview

Plea Bargaining Research Paper

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
707 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Plea Bargaining Research Paper
Plea-bargaining Paper
Julio L. Aguilera
CJA/224
June 26, 2013
Russell Galbreath

Plea-bargaining Paper
Plea-bargaining is a very useful tool that can be implemented by attorneys in the justice system. Attorneys can use plea-bargaining to take the decision of innocent or guilty out of the judges and jurors hands, and decide the defendant’s fate without going to trial. When researching the term plea-bargaining It is stated in the course textbook that there is no agreed-upon definition of the term plea-bargaining, However the textbook does refer to Black 's Law Dictionary 's Definition of plea-bargaining which is: “the process whereby the accused and the prosecutor in a criminal case work out a mutually satisfactory disposition of the case
…show more content…

Charge bargaining and sentence bargaining are two types of plea-bargaining that attorneys will use when offering a defendant the plea-bargaining option. Charge bargaining refers to the prosecutor’s ability to negotiate with the defendant in terms of the charges that could be filed; sentence bargaining occurs when a defendant agrees to plead guilty in exchange for a less serious sentence(Siegel, Schmalleger, & Worrall, 2011). Plea-bargaining is good for the fact that it brings the court convictions of criminals. There are advantages of plea-bargaining for the prosecutor, defense attorney, judge, defendant, and victim. First the prosecutor obtains a conviction which is always a good day in their book. The defense attorney also has the advantage when this option is agreed on for the fact that he or she gets their client a lighter …show more content…

The "tough on crime" side mighht say that they are not in favor of the plea-bargaining system for the fact that it lets criminals get away with a lesser charge and lighter sentence which many would say isn’t fair to the victim. Those who want to protect due process rights on the other hand would rule in favor of the plea-bargaining system because it gives the people a chance at lesser sentence which they would say protects the people from the abuse of the justice system. All in all the plea-bargaining system has its pros and cons. All roles in the court system have the chance to benefit when plea-bargaining is used over the option of going to trial. Well some critics will stand by their reason that they believe plea-bargaining allows criminals to get away with their crimes due to the possibility of lighter sentencing, Others would refer to the positives a plea-bargain brings for example the victims chance to receive retribution right away without having to waste time with a long drawn out

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Chapters 5-9 Study guide

    • 2328 Words
    • 10 Pages

    2. For defense attorneys a “successful” case often means a reduction in sentence via a plea bargain, not…

    • 2328 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cole, Plea-bargaining is negotiating a settlement between the prosecutor and the defense attorney, that would exchange a guilty plea for a lighter sentence.. Generally if the prosecutor is willing to lower the sentence, the defense will accept and plea guilty to the crime he or she was accused of. Roughly thirty-five years ago, plea-bargaining was not discussed outside of the courtroom. It was a “secret” of the court and done behind closed doors. Now, people know what plea-bargaining is, and is now a very controversial subject in society. There are positives and negative aspects of plea-bargaining in the case of Councilman…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Questions Week 3

    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages

    There are many advantages and disadvantages when it comes to plea bargaining. Among the advantages the defendants could possibly receive a lighter sentence, they can end up with a lesser charge, and most importantly they move through the criminal justice system a lot faster than if they were to fight a case. As for disadvantages both the defendants and the victims would be affected by plea bargaining. The defendant might not be guilty however he/she knows not enough evidence exists to prove their innocence and so they accept the plea, thus accepting punishment this not deserved. Victims are affected by plea bargaining because they almost always feel cheated as though the accused did not get what he/she deserved and as though justice was not served.…

    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    When it comes to plea bargaining, there are two different types that can be offered to the defendant by the prosecutor: sentence bargaining and charge bargaining. Sentence bargaining is when the accused is informed of what the sentence will be with a guilty plea and is useful in helping the prosecutor to obtain a conviction by offering the minimum, instead of the maximum sentence for the charge. If the defendant is facing serious charges and does not want to chance receiving a maximum sentence during trial, they may enter a guilty plea in order to serve the least amount of time possible. Charge bargaining is when the prosecutor offers to either charge the accused with a lesser charge, or to reduce the number of charges that have been filed against him/her, in exchange for a guilty plea. For example, if the defendant is charged with a DUI, driving with an expired license, and driving with expired…

    • 1298 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plea bargains are an assertion in a criminal case between the prosecutor and the respondent that ordinarily includes the litigant conceding so as to get a lesser offense or sentence. Plea bargains are frequently alluded to as truly simply building up a common affirmation of the case's qualities and shortcomings, and don't really reflect a conventional feeling of Justice. In principle, courts are glad to host the individual gatherings work out an answer independent from anyone else, yet it makes one wonder…

    • 182 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Some pros of plea bargain is, creating a less over-crowed, over-whelmed system by taking simple cases away. With taking smaller cases away the prosecutors will have few trials to deal with and they will be more effective to the major cases they have. Another positive thing is that not matter if…

    • 177 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    An attorney can not make decisions for you but a seasons defense attorney would generally know how the prosecutor is in terms of flexibility in plea bargaining. Plea bargaining is where the prosecutor would recommend a lesser sentence or even lower the charges against you in exchange for a guilty plea. In some cases, it may be smart to wait until all the evidence is on the table before making a deal, but the extent of their deal will only go as far as the evidence, the severity of the crime and criminal history. The general goal for plea bargaining is to quickly resolve the case while also obtaining a guilty plea for a lesser sentence. The court would also decide whether or not the suspect would be eligible for bail. Next is the pre-trial hearing. The pre-trial is used to handle specific issues with the case and typically involve the judge, prosecutor, defense attorney, the defendant and sometimes other involved parties like Officer Gassman, an officer testifying for the trial. Pre-trial motions can be filed by both the prosecutor and the defense and their purpose is to better increase their chances of success for the…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plea-Bargaining originally started in the early part of the nineteenth century with the violation of liquor laws. It is one of many issues viewed in the criminal justice system. It may or may not be beneficial to the accused person allowing them a lighter sentence. This paper will discuss definition of plea bargaining, distinguish between charge bargaining and sentence bargaining, compare and contrast the pros and cons associated with the use of plea bargains, and describing how plea bargaining reflects or thwarts the crime control and due process models of criminal justice.…

    • 1064 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plea bargaining is the essence of the criminal justice system, and it is the process in which a defendant pleads guilty to a criminal charge in order to receive some consideration from the state. There are various types of plea bargaining deals that defendants may accept, which include charge bargaining, count bargaining, and sentence bargaining. Charge bargaining requires the defendant to plead guilty to a less serious crime than the one originally charged with. Count bargaining requires the defendant to plead guilty to partial charges or counts, but not all of the charges presented against them. Lastly, sentence bargaining requires the defendant to plead guilty in exchange for leniency in sentencing.…

    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The main fault that I see with a plea bargain is that it violates the six amendment. The reason why the sixth amendment is in violation is that plea bargaining goes against what it stands for. The sixth amendment states that everyone has the right to a fair trial; however, most cases are not even analyzed in front of a judge or jury because of a plea bargain. The main reason a plea bargain is put into play is to push a case through the system faster and resolve it quicker. Furthermore, everyone knows that when situations are rushed that information is likely to be missed. For example, there are many situations where defendants take a plea bargain to stray away from more intense punishment. However, many individuals who take this bargain are…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The question we are debating today is whether or not plea-bargaining undermines the Criminal justice system? The job of the Criminal justice system is to protect the citizens of the United States. How are we protecting them if we give criminals shorter sentences than they deserve? When we plea bargain we release more criminals back into the streets and put citizens of the United States' safety at risk. A plea bargain is an agreement in a criminal case in which a prosecutor and a defendant arrange to settle the case against the defendant. The United states department of justice's mission statement reads: To enforce the law and defend the interests of the United States according to the law; to ensure public safety against threats foreign and domestic; to provide federal leadership in preventing and controlling crime; to seek just punishment for those guilty of unlawful behavior; and to ensure fair and impartial administration of justice for all Americans. This statement is being undermined because not…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Canadian Law Dictionary (2013) defines “plea bargaining” as “an informal practice where the accused uses his or her right both to plead guilty in order to bargain for a benefit that is usually related to a charge or the sentence”. A plea bargain is the most common method used in the disposition of criminal cases and makes up 95% of cases in Canada (Barbara, Morrison, and Cunningham, 1976) and usually consists of an agreement with the Crown prosecutor to make an alliance to get the judge to make a sentence. In most cases plea bargaining is considered as a “deal with the devil”. In 1975, the Law Reform Commission of Canada defined "plea bargaining" as "any agreement by the accused to plead guilty in return for the promise of some benefit…

    • 1084 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Using the fairness and justice decision-making process it made me decide that the use of plea bargaining was unethical; due to the fact that it was not fair that criminals who have committed unlawful acts like rape, robbery, and numerous horrendous crimes were given leniency just because they are acknowledging they executed the offense. Stating your guilty doesn’t mean they reflected upon their actions and are ready to start a new leaf. They have instigated the felony and it is only right that they get the full consequence of their atrocity. Furthermore, what’s worse is that because of the pressure and fear of being convicted, the innocent plead guilty and the immoral run free and continue to disrupt the peace of the community. In conclusion, there is no fairness and justice when there is plea bargaining.…

    • 240 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dual Court System

    • 1085 Words
    • 5 Pages

    among the nation's founders about the need for individual states to retain significant legislative authority and judicial autonomy separate from federal control. The reason why we have a dual-court system is, back then; new states joining the union were assured of limited federal intervention into local affairs. The state legislatures were free to create laws, and state court systems were needed to hear cases in which violations of those laws occurred. Today, however, state courts do not hear cases involving alleged violations of federal law, nor do federal courts involve themselves in deciding issues of state law unless there is a conflict between local or state statues and federal constitutional guarantees. When that happens, claimed violations of federal due process guarantees especially those found in the Bill of Rights.…

    • 1085 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When criminals are arrested and about to be tried in front of a jury of their peers and a judge, they are most likely will be offered a plea deal. Now this plea deal if it is accepted by the offender will stand as their punishment for the crime committed without having to go through court and trial which in some cases helps to spare the victims from having to testify in front of the person that had wronged them. Rape victims are the ones that are the most beneficial from plea bargaining, they do not have to face the offender that brought them such harm. On another note though these offenders are not serving the time that they would originally be given if gone to trial so the victims feel as though there is an injustice to plea bargaining. People that are harmed want their offenders to serve the most time they can so that they are given time to heal and recover from these inhumane acts of committed against them. “The Bureau of Justice Statistics, after studying partial data on state-court felony prosecutions nationwide, found that from 1986 to 2006 the ratio of pleas to trials nearly doubled.” (Oppel, 2011)…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics