Preview

Plea Bargaining Advantages

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
519 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Plea Bargaining Advantages
When criminals are arrested and about to be tried in front of a jury of their peers and a judge, they are most likely will be offered a plea deal. Now this plea deal if it is accepted by the offender will stand as their punishment for the crime committed without having to go through court and trial which in some cases helps to spare the victims from having to testify in front of the person that had wronged them. Rape victims are the ones that are the most beneficial from plea bargaining, they do not have to face the offender that brought them such harm. On another note though these offenders are not serving the time that they would originally be given if gone to trial so the victims feel as though there is an injustice to plea bargaining. People that are harmed want their offenders to serve the most time they can so that they are given time to heal and recover from these inhumane acts of committed against them. “The Bureau of Justice Statistics, after studying partial data on state-court felony prosecutions nationwide, found that from 1986 to 2006 the ratio of pleas to trials nearly doubled.” (Oppel, 2011) Is plea bargaining the easy way out for criminals? In a way it is because they would not have to serve the maximum sentence that could have been handed to them …show more content…
“Without question, plea bargains benefit many defendants who have committed crimes and receive lighter sentences than they might after trial. It also limits cases that require considerable time and expense in court.” (Oppel, 2011) Victims feel as though this gives them less jail time which in turn means that they will be back out on the streets sooner to resume committing these crimes again. Victims fear for their lives and the lives of their family as well because they feel as though there may be some retaliation brought to them because they file charges against

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Councilman Gallagher was accused of having raped a woman whom he had a meeting with last July. One side says the sex was consensual and the other says it wasn’t and that he raped her. When the case was dismissed by the judge because of unfair and irrelevant questions, the Councilman was offered a plea bargain. Gallagher was first offered a plea bargain that would keep him out of jail but he would have to admit being guilty of committing the above accusations. He denied that offer and was made another.…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The concept of plea bargaining became a common means to resolve criminal cases in the early 1900s because not everyone that was accused of a crime had a lawyer to represent them in a trial. As the criminal justice system evolved, and there were more and more cases to prosecute, plea-bargaining was used more often so that all parties would have a faster resolution to the case, as opposed to going through a lengthy trial. The definition of plea bargaining is “the process whereby the accused and the prosecutor in a criminal case work out a mutually satisfactory disposition of the case subject to court approval [that] usually involves the defendant’s pleading guilty to a lesser offense or to only some of the counts of a multicounty indictment in return for a lighter sentence than the possible for the graver charge.” (Siegel, Schmalleger, & Worrall, 2011, Chapter 12, Plea Bargaining and Guilty Pleas).…

    • 1298 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Some pros of plea bargain is, creating a less over-crowed, over-whelmed system by taking simple cases away. With taking smaller cases away the prosecutors will have few trials to deal with and they will be more effective to the major cases they have. Another positive thing is that not matter if…

    • 177 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Plea Bargain

    • 857 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Brief: Respondent was arrested and charged with possession of methamphetamine with the intent to distribute, in violation of 84 Stat. 1260. On October 17, 1991, respondent and his attorney asked to meet with the prosecutor to discuss the possibility of cooperating with the Government. At the beginning of the meeting, the prosecutor informed respondent that he had no obligation to talk, but that if he wanted to cooperate, he would have to be completely truthful. As a condition of proceeding with the discussion, the prosecutor indicated that the respondent would have to agree that any statements he made could be used to impeach any contradictory testimony he might give at trial if it went that far. Respondent conversed with his counsel and agreed to proceed under the prosecutor’s conditions. The respondent admitted to knowing that the package he attempted to sell to the undercover cop did contain methamphetamine. Respondent claimed that he did not know Shuster was manufacturing methamphetamine at his residence and later confessed that he did know of Shuster manufacturing methamphetamine in his residence. Respondent minimized his role in Shuster’s methamphetamine operation by claiming that he had not visited Shuster’s residence for at least a week before his arrest. The government showed the respondent surveillance evidence showing that his car was at Shuster’s residence the day before the arrest. The meeting ended on the basis that the respondent failed to provide completely truthful information. Respondent was tried on the methamphetamine charges and took the stand at his own defense. He maintained that he was not involved in the methamphetamine trafficking and he had thought Shuster was using his home laboratory to make plastic explosives for the CIA. He denied knowing that the package he delivered to the…

    • 857 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    By not producing results that correlate with the outcome, plea bargaining weakens the validity of the criminal justice system. Validity or legitimacy is a very important characteristic of the legal system’s effectiveness. The view of the legal system is determined considerably on whether or not the system operates in harmony with basic rules of procedural fairness, for example treating cases alike or allowing parties an opportunity to be heard. Nevertheless, a system that fails to function under such rules will lose their…

    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The main fault that I see with a plea bargain is that it violates the six amendment. The reason why the sixth amendment is in violation is that plea bargaining goes against what it stands for. The sixth amendment states that everyone has the right to a fair trial; however, most cases are not even analyzed in front of a judge or jury because of a plea bargain. The main reason a plea bargain is put into play is to push a case through the system faster and resolve it quicker. Furthermore, everyone knows that when situations are rushed that information is likely to be missed. For example, there are many situations where defendants take a plea bargain to stray away from more intense punishment. However, many individuals who take this bargain are…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Using the fairness and justice decision-making process it made me decide that the use of plea bargaining was unethical; due to the fact that it was not fair that criminals who have committed unlawful acts like rape, robbery, and numerous horrendous crimes were given leniency just because they are acknowledging they executed the offense. Stating your guilty doesn’t mean they reflected upon their actions and are ready to start a new leaf. They have instigated the felony and it is only right that they get the full consequence of their atrocity. Furthermore, what’s worse is that because of the pressure and fear of being convicted, the innocent plead guilty and the immoral run free and continue to disrupt the peace of the community. In conclusion, there is no fairness and justice when there is plea bargaining.…

    • 240 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plea-bargaining has been practiced in the criminal justice system for over 300 years. Controversial cases have brought plea bargains to the forefront and have created bias towards this practice. However, if plea bargains were not implemented, a chaotic and expensive justice system would be created. With such cases bringing a negative view to plea-bargaining, this research paper aims to show the positives and negatives of plea-bargaining. Critics of plea-bargaining believe that sentences demonstrate to be more lenient to the defendants, contributes to the issue of mass incarceration, and how the Crown persuades defendants into pleading guilty. Nevertheless, supporters of plea bargains find that plea deals are beginning to including the victims…

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Plea bargaining became common sometime after the Civil War. The proliferation of cases, in the federal courts, brought on by prohibition was instrumental in the institutionalization of plea bargaining. (Neubauer, 2002, p. 323) It was not until the sixties that plea bargaining became a topic of controversy. This controversy seems to stem from the fact that the name suggests that the courts are bargaining with criminals. But "much of what is characterized as 'plea bargaining ' often involves the assessment and reassessment of facts...." (Nasheri, 1998, p. 24) After examining all the facts the conclusion might be that there is just not…

    • 2149 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Plea Bargaining Cases

    • 1514 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The United States court system has become dependent on processing serious crime through plea bargains. People believe that plea bargaining should be abolished because it does not provide rightful justice. Schulhofer (1992) says “plea bargaining seriously impairs the public interest in effective punishment of crime and in accurate separation of the guilty from innocent (p. 1979).” This is because plea bargaining lighten charges that if they went to court they would get much firmer punishment. Plea bargains have also been taken by innocent people due to the fear of being convicted and serving a longer sentence. Some lawyers will pressure their clients into…

    • 1514 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plea Bargains

    • 621 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Plea bargaining is not a useful tool. The court systems, in order to save themselves from a trial, “…forces the party into a situation where they have to take a guess about what the evidence is, about how strong the case might be, and they have to make that guess against the background of enormously severe…

    • 621 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The majorities of individuals charged with a crime, whether state or federal never see the inside of a courtroom, and if they do see a courtroom it is not in the context that one would think. The defendant is not sitting in a courtroom full of spectators watching as attorneys argue the guilt or innocence of the defendant to twelve jurors who will eventually decide their fate. This perception of a courtroom has been molded into the minds of Americans through television. The real picture of how the majority of cases are tried is not in a courtroom, but a small room with the prosecutor who pushes the defendant to take a plea bargain. Plea bargaining is a process that uses negotiation to entice the defendant into pleading guilty to a lesser charge or only one of several charges without going to trial, which is a violation…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    No matter the severity of the case, plea bargaining is relied on heavily in the United States. Many people see this as controversial and disrespectful to the victims and their families; just as many people see this as a necessary tool for justice to be served. With our criminal justice system relying so heavily on plea bargaining, we have to ask ourselves a few questions: is the verdict of these cases better for the victim or the criminal; does this institution we call plea bargaining give the ability for justice to be served or does the crime get diluted and become justice…

    • 2152 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    plea bargain

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages

    With all the crimes that are going on today you have to wonder why there are not more jails filled up. Well some of the reasons is due to either the lack of evidence or the fact that they can find anything to change the person with, then there are plea bargains, what are plea bargains well let’s take a closer look.…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The basic idea was that a man who had been betrayed by the system decided to teach the system a lesson—from inside jail. The film also takes an incriminating look at the inconsistencies of an overloaded justice system. If I am a regular person and some very wrong happened to people whom I care than I would want pure justice. Clyde Shelton (hero in this movie) doesn’t get justice and he makes a decision to take matters into his own hands. He’s doing what he thinks is right, what he thinks is honorable. In short the Plea-negotiation has the benefits and demerits but there is a need to consider these demerits, if we want to improve the judicial justice system as if it is not addressed properly than there can happen a very dangerous situation.…

    • 877 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays