Preview

What Is Plea Bargaining In Court

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
626 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
What Is Plea Bargaining In Court
The majorities of individuals charged with a crime, whether state or federal never see the inside of a courtroom, and if they do see a courtroom it is not in the context that one would think. The defendant is not sitting in a courtroom full of spectators watching as attorneys argue the guilt or innocence of the defendant to twelve jurors who will eventually decide their fate. This perception of a courtroom has been molded into the minds of Americans through television. The real picture of how the majority of cases are tried is not in a courtroom, but a small room with the prosecutor who pushes the defendant to take a plea bargain. Plea bargaining is a process that uses negotiation to entice the defendant into pleading guilty to a lesser charge or only one of several charges without going to trial, which is a violation …show more content…
This idea of separateness concerning the two is what causes the misconceptions of amendment violations that plague our justice system and the defendants at its mercy. And although two cases have been presented to the United States Supreme Court, Missouri v. Frye, and Lafler v. Cooper and found to be unconstitutional for violating requirements listed in Strickland vs Washington, people still declare they cannot see a clear violation of one’s sixth amendment right in regardless to plea bargains.
In conclusion, individuals on both sides of plea bargaining can dispute the amendment rights found within the plea agreement and argue why they are or are not being violated, even though court ruling have been brought forth showing that violation have occurred. It will likely take being on the side of accepting a plea bargain agreement before an advocate for pleas will be able to relate and admit to the violations that are being executed throughout the plea bargain
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Chapters 5-9 Study guide
    • 2328 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Chapters 5-9 Study guide

    2. For defense attorneys a “successful” case often means a reduction in sentence via a plea bargain, not…

    • 2328 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Plea Bargain Research Paper
    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Plea Bargain Research Paper

    Councilman Gallagher was accused of having raped a woman whom he had a meeting with last July. One side says the sex was consensual and the other says it wasn’t and that he raped her. When the case was dismissed by the judge because of unfair and irrelevant questions, the Councilman was offered a plea bargain. Gallagher was first offered a plea bargain that would keep him out of jail but he would have to admit being guilty of committing the above accusations. He denied that offer and was made another.…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Plea Bargainig CJA224
    • 1189 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Plea Bargainig CJA224

    First, when it comes to plea bargaining there are two types that the attorneys deal with the most , they are charge bargaining and sentence bargaining: charge bargaining is the most common form of plea bargaining, the defendant agrees to plead guilty to a lesser charge provided that greater charges will be dismissed. A typical example would be to plead to manslaughter rather than murder (Find Law, 2014) Sentence bargaining is a far less common and more tightly controlled that charge bargaining, sentence bargaining is when a defendant agrees to plead guilty to the stated charger in return for a lighter sentence. Typically this must be reviewed by a judge, and man jurisdictions simply don’t allow it (Find Law, 2014). Basically the different between the two are charge bargain occurs when the prosecutor allows a defendant to plead and serve a lesser charge (Larson, 2000). Sentence bargain basically occurs when a defendant is told in advance what his or her sentence will be if they plead guilty.…

    • 1189 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    The Ins and Outs of Plea Bargaining
    • 1298 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Ins and Outs of Plea Bargaining

    When it comes to plea bargaining, there are two different types that can be offered to the defendant by the prosecutor: sentence bargaining and charge bargaining. Sentence bargaining is when the accused is informed of what the sentence will be with a guilty plea and is useful in helping the prosecutor to obtain a conviction by offering the minimum, instead of the maximum sentence for the charge. If the defendant is facing serious charges and does not want to chance receiving a maximum sentence during trial, they may enter a guilty plea in order to serve the least amount of time possible. Charge bargaining is when the prosecutor offers to either charge the accused with a lesser charge, or to reduce the number of charges that have been filed against him/her, in exchange for a guilty plea. For example, if the defendant is charged with a DUI, driving with an expired license, and driving with expired…

    • 1298 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Plea Bargains Research Paper
    • 182 Words
    • 1 Page

    Plea Bargains Research Paper

    Plea bargains are an assertion in a criminal case between the prosecutor and the respondent that ordinarily includes the litigant conceding so as to get a lesser offense or sentence. Plea bargains are frequently alluded to as truly simply building up a common affirmation of the case's qualities and shortcomings, and don't really reflect a conventional feeling of Justice. In principle, courts are glad to host the individual gatherings work out an answer independent from anyone else, yet it makes one wonder…

    • 182 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Plea Bargaining
    • 177 Words
    • 1 Page

    Pros And Cons Of Plea Bargaining

    Plea Bargaining has become a major factor in our criminal justice system. Like all controversial topics there are many pros and cons that make it hard to decide what is right and wrong about the situation. I personally feel that plea bargaining should be abolished. Plea bargains are creating harm to our criminal justice system. Due to plea bargains the criminal justice system is being undermined and losing control of what is happening to criminals.…

    • 177 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Role Of Plea Bargaining In The Criminal Justice System
    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Role Of Plea Bargaining In The Criminal Justice System

    By not producing results that correlate with the outcome, plea bargaining weakens the validity of the criminal justice system. Validity or legitimacy is a very important characteristic of the legal system’s effectiveness. The view of the legal system is determined considerably on whether or not the system operates in harmony with basic rules of procedural fairness, for example treating cases alike or allowing parties an opportunity to be heard. Nevertheless, a system that fails to function under such rules will lose their…

    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Plea Bargaining Analysis
    • 1461 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Plea Bargaining Analysis

    A plea bargain (“offer”) is an acquiescent in a criminal case whereby the prosecution may offer the defendant the opportunity to plead guilty, conventionally to a lesser charge or to the pristine criminal charge with a proposal of a lighter than the maximum sentence. This opportunity sanctions defendants to avoid the risk of a conviction by trial on a more serious charge. This allows a court’s caseloads to be lighter without exhausting resources of a court, potential public advocators, and prosecutors who are all salaried at the expense of tax payers.…

    • 1461 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    What Is Plea Bargaining Ethical?
    • 240 Words
    • 1 Page

    What Is Plea Bargaining Ethical?

    Using the fairness and justice decision-making process it made me decide that the use of plea bargaining was unethical; due to the fact that it was not fair that criminals who have committed unlawful acts like rape, robbery, and numerous horrendous crimes were given leniency just because they are acknowledging they executed the offense. Stating your guilty doesn’t mean they reflected upon their actions and are ready to start a new leaf. They have instigated the felony and it is only right that they get the full consequence of their atrocity. Furthermore, what’s worse is that because of the pressure and fear of being convicted, the innocent plead guilty and the immoral run free and continue to disrupt the peace of the community. In conclusion, there is no fairness and justice when there is plea bargaining.…

    • 240 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Role Of Plea Bargaining In The Criminal Justice System
    • 127 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Role Of Plea Bargaining In The Criminal Justice System

    As Nataskie stated above, there is a place and a need for plea bargaining in our criminal justice system. Although it is true that plea bargaining gives a guilty person the opportunity to admit to their crime and accept the punishment for it, they are likely more motivated by the fact that plea bargaining involves the perpetrator receiving a reduced sentence of some sort. Another reason for continuing with plea bargaining, as a tool in the criminal justice system, is because often it affords the prosecutor the means necessary to get a lesser criminal to testify against a more significant criminal who otherwise might go free. Plea bargaining should maintain an active role in all justice systems regardless of whether they are local, state,…

    • 127 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Dual Court System
    • 1085 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Dual Court System

    among the nation's founders about the need for individual states to retain significant legislative authority and judicial autonomy separate from federal control. The reason why we have a dual-court system is, back then; new states joining the union were assured of limited federal intervention into local affairs. The state legislatures were free to create laws, and state court systems were needed to hear cases in which violations of those laws occurred. Today, however, state courts do not hear cases involving alleged violations of federal law, nor do federal courts involve themselves in deciding issues of state law unless there is a conflict between local or state statues and federal constitutional guarantees. When that happens, claimed violations of federal due process guarantees especially those found in the Bill of Rights.…

    • 1085 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Charge Negotiation
    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Charge Negotiation

    A plea bargain falls under the discretionary powers of the prosecution, meaning the public is able to trust that the parties involved in the process have upheld the same judicial principles that would apply to a conviction reached after trial.…

    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Plea Bargaining In The Criminal Justice System
    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Plea Bargaining In The Criminal Justice System

    I do believe that there are instances where plea bargaining can be an effective tool in the criminal justice system, however, as it stands, the overuse of the plea bargain by prosecutors has diminished it’s potential worth as a true bargaining tool by their flagrant daily misuse. While it is understood that the case load for the courts is overwhelmed and an alternative method of securing some form of justice is needed to alleviate the overrun system, the use of the plea bargain to alleviate the overcrowded courts is not completely acceptable.…

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Trials And Verdicts
    • 785 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Trials And Verdicts

    The constitution is the basis of all criminal law as well as trials and their verdicts. The constitution and the state and federal court systems have been in effect since the nineteenth century. Each and every court case has their own unique processes related to the different courts and how the case made it to any specific one, taking a plea bargain as an alternative to facing trial and what happens to the wrongfully accused will help understand a little more about the ins and outs of trials and verdicts.…

    • 785 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Right to Counsel
    • 1415 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Right to Counsel

    Every individual is afforded the right to counsel in criminal proceedings. It is the liability of the government to provide every defendant facing criminal charges with legal representation that also is considered sufficient (2011). The Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution guarantees every individual the right to a swift and public trial from an unbiased jury of his or her peers in the state or district in which the crime was committed in (1995-2011). The district should have been beforehand established by law, and to be educated of the nature and reason for the charge, the right to face the eyewitness in opposition of him or her, to have necessary process for gathering eyewitnesses in his or her support (1995-2011). Last, the Sixth Amendment affords and individual the right to have the aid of an attorney for his or her defense (1995-2011). The last statement of the Sixth Amendments establishes that every individual has a right to counsel from the very second he or she is placed in police confinement (2011).…

    • 1415 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More

Related Topics