Preview

Ancient History

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1648 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Ancient History
To what extent was Themistocles responsible for the Greek victory in the Persian wars in 480-479BC?
Themistocles was a prominent figure within the Greek battles against the Persians during the periods of 480-479 BC. Themistocles had a major influence in the battles at Artemisium, Salamis, Plataea and Mycale which lead to the Greek victory in the war. Through his unique contributions to the battles, Themistocles had greatly impacted on these victories some majorly others to a small extent, achieved through his unique tactics and strategies. Part of Themistocles strategies was the ‘Naval Policy’, this included: Fortifying the Piraeus peninsula, also he was able to persuade the Athenians to pay for the building of a fleet, using the silver from the mines at Laurium. From these mines Themistocles was able to expand the Greek navy by 200 triremes; this would aid Themistocles in achieving his goal in the naval battles at Artemisium and Salamis. The land battles included; Plataea and Mycale, his contributions led to the conquest of the Greeks overall. As a result from Themistocles naval policy it had significant outcomes to each battle in a certain way.
Themistocles’s naval policy was the foundation for future superiority for the Athenians, for these reasons the Athenians depended on the sea to be a trading power. As Herodotus stats: “Athens’ future lay on the sea as a trading power”. As a result, this lead Themistocles to plan the improvement of the harbours in Athens for the trireme building programs, which will enable the Greeks to have a larger Navy consisting of triremes. During 493BC Themistocles decided to fortify the Piraeus peninsula with a strong wall, this was to secure and overlook the 3 harbours from this location. “In 483-482BC Themistocles persuaded the Athenian to pay for the building of a fleet, using the silver from the mines at Laurium”. This meant that the income generated was put directly on the constructions and development of triremes for the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Battle of Thermopylae started out in the late summer of 480 B.C, the Spartan King Leonidas 1 held out for three days with a mere 300 hoplites against thousands upon thousands of the best Great King’s troops. Under thirty-five Persian generals, were assembled for the invasion of Greece, five whom where sons of the royal house. On the arrival of Xerxes at Thermopylae, he saw the that place was defended by a large of number of Spartans, and about seven thousand hoplites from other states, commanded by the Spartan King Leonidas.…

    • 1358 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Battle of thermopylae was an important battle for both the persian and greek army, the leader of the persian fleet was Xerxes whose army was far more larger than King Leonidas, leader of the Greek army, but Leonidas was a far more tactical and smarter war general than Xerxes.…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Herodotus, the Greek army did not have enough troops to maintain the Persians troops so they were heavily outnumbered this lead to the Persians surround the Greek Force. A major factor on the defeat of the defeat of the Greeks was of the disunity of the Greek states.…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Final Study Guide

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1. The great Persian invasion under Xerxes was a crucial factor in cementing the ties of Greek ethnicity and a sense of separation from other peoples. It is no accident that the great playwright Aeschylus asked that his tombstone be engraved only with a mention of participation in the war and was content to omit his dramatic victories. What were the causes of this invasion? What was the Persian strategy? How did the Greeks respond to the threat? What were the crucial battles in the war and finally why did the Persians fail?…

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The reasons for the Greek victory against the Persians in 490 to 480/479 BC was a mixture of exceptional leadership, skilful tactics and strategy, superior weapons and soldiers, and Greek unity. Strong leadership was the most important aspect of the Greek defence, as without the intelligence and bravery of the leaders, the Greeks would have been easily defeated. As a result of the excellent leadership; Greek tactics, strategy, and unity were greatly strengthened. Combined with their better weapons and soldiers, the Greeks held the advantage and seized opportunities at the perfect moment. Also, with each victory the Greeks grew more confident of success and defiant of the Persian attempts to invade. The poor organisation and disarray of their enemy led to an undermining of the Persian might and further improved Greece's chances of success.…

    • 2672 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Explain the preparations of the Greeks and the Persians in the intervening war period of 490 BC – 480 BC.…

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Greeks during the Greco-Persian War manipulated terrain as a force multiplier in many battles; at the Battle of Marathon, Miltiades used the Vrana Valley to prevent a Persian march on Athens, at the Battle of Thermopylae, Leonidas used the narrow, Thermopylae pass to invalidate the Persian numbers, and at the Battle of Artemisium, Themistocles used the Artemisium Strait to aid in his battle against the Persian fleets.…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    After the conclusion of the Persian Wars (492-479BC) with Athens being the true victor, and before the Peloponnesian War, a period of prosperity covered Athens, and they needed to devise new ways to protect themselves and expand their wealth, and how this would affect their relations with allies.…

    • 2213 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Even before the war, Themistocles played a key role in creating the circumstances in which a victory might be possible. Themistocles was the advocate for Athenian naval power which eventually played a very important and critical role in the wars. He convinced the Athenians to spend the silver found at Laurion on the production of ships and not gifts for the people. His persuasion led to the building of 200 triremes. Themistocles promoted the land/sea strategy which, in turn, made him a key player in the events surrounding the Battle of Artemisium. By developing Athenian naval forces, he increased Greek naval strength and gave them the upper hand in sea battles where they were usually disadvantaged on land due to Persian cavalry and archery. Modern historian Victor Ehrenberg states that it was Themistocles’ naval policy that determined the course of the century. Themistocles was also heavily involved in the Hellenic league which eventually brought together 31 Greek states to fight against the Persians. By being…

    • 1448 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Our Debt to Themistocles

    • 710 Words
    • 3 Pages

    We know nothing of his early life. Themistocles (thuh MISS tuh kleez) was born between 510 and 520 BC and stepped onto the world stage in 490 BC. At that time, the lives of the Greeks were entwined with the imperial ambitions of the Persians, the greatest military power in the world, who had just retreated to Persia from their loss by outnumbered Athenians at the Battle of Marathon. All serious statesmen and military leaders fully expected the Persians to return. In 482, Themistocles challenged Aristides for leadership of Athens, believing that Athens could only defeat Persia, ultimately, on the sea, Aristides placing his hope on another victory on land. Themistocles won the challenge, and immediately turned the Athenian wealth into naval expansion.…

    • 710 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Once these have been specified, it will be much easier to further evaluate and study. To begin, the Battle of Salamis was a naval battles fought between the Athenians and Persians in the strait between Salamis and Piraeus. The Greeks, once they saw the Persians, immediately retreated and lured them deeper into the strait. The Athenian ships were in a “L” formation until, after being thoroughly drawn in, the Persians were met by a Greek navy of about 370 vessels. No one dared attack until one Greek ship charged through and rammed the Persians, and the rest of the vessels soon followed.…

    • 660 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    By the middle of the 5th century B.C. Athens and Sparta, the two most powerful Greek city-states, found themselves on the brink of a full-scale war. According to Thucydides, at the beginning of the war both Athens and Sparta were at the pick of their might and flourishing and could trade and cooperate to each other’s benefit; instead, they got involved into an armed confrontation, in which the rest of the Greek cities participated, on one side or on the other.…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Despite their huge differences, both Sparta and Athens united to fight the Persians together. In the book The Portable Greek Historians by M. I. Finley, Herodotus records, “The Greeks who at this spott awaited the coming of Xerxes were the following: from Sparta, three hundred men-at-arms; from Arcadia, a thousand Tegeans and Mantineans, five hundred of people; a hundred and twenty Orchomenians, from the Arcadian Orchomenus’ and a thousand from other cities,” (Herodotus, The Persian Wars 7.202)....Herodotus continues, “The sea was in good keeping, watched by the Athenians, the Aeginetans, and the rest of the fleet,” (Herodotus, The Persian Wars 7.203). In addition, Herodotus says, “The various nations had each captains of their own under whom they served; but the one to whom all especially looked up, and who had the command of the entire force, was the Lacedaemonian, Leonidas,” (Herodotus, The Persian Wars 7.204). Based off Herodotus’ statements, all the Greeks were waiting upon Xerxes’ arrival. They included Sparta, the strongest military, Arcadia, Tegeans, Mantineans, and more. Also, the Athenians, who had the strongest navy were also accompanied by other Greeks while awaiting the arrival of the Persian navy. These records by Herodotus show the concept of Greek unity or panhellenism as Greeks from all different poleis come together to fight the stronger Persian army who were considered barbarians or outsiders. The Persians were coming to conquer Athen but all other Greek poleis refused to let Athens battle alone. Even having significant differences the Greeks appointed Spartan king Leonidas as head of command. They recognized that Sparta had the best army at the time and Leonidas was the best choice for command. Athenians and Spartans have very significant differences but in this battle they united…

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    ancient history

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Sources reveal that the lives of woman in Sparta, that they were treated differently to spartiate men, they were not allowed to do majority if things that the Spartan men did, such as hunting, working, and most leisure activities such as watching cockfighting or boar fighting. Woman were to stay at home and do home duties such as cooking, cleaning and ultimately look after the children. Women were expected to raise children and to make sure they learn the Spartan way of life. woman were able to compete in athletics, mostly running events, they also enjoyed dancing routines which were carried out often in religious festivals of the gods.…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    ancient civilizations

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Ancient China was a country that was impacted by its geographic features. Ancient China was a very large country. China’s physical features were very greatly impacted by the contact of other cultures. Some of ancient China’s physical features that prevented them from having contact with other cultures were its large mountains and deserts. This had a good and a bad side to it. The good side was that China was well protected from intruders. However, the bad side to this was that it was it more difficult for China to have contact with other cultures. (Document 2). This also led to China becoming very ethnocentric. Yu was a very important figure in ancient China. Ancient China was in need for water since it was surrounded by deserts and mountains. The solution Yu had to this problem was that he opened passages for the streams throughout the provinces and deepened the existing channels and canals as well as directing them to the streams (Document 4).…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays