It revealed some of the parents were litigants against the MMR vaccine and that Wakefield received £55,000 from the Legal Aid Board to collate a case against the vaccine. He failed to inform The Lancelet of the money he had received this was a clear breach of The Lancet’s declaration of interests which requires any finances that could influence their work, to be declared (Thelancet.com 2014). He also failed to inform his the other members of his research group of this, and, when the report was published he denied receiving the money personally. It is believed that in total £435,643 was paid to Andrew Wakefield to discredit the safety of the MMR vaccine (Thetimesonline.co.uk 2006). This is a serious breach of scientific ethics as Wakefield’s personal interest of receiving money to produce evidence against the vaccine was clearly contravening his professional obligation to remain impartial to the results of the …show more content…
He applied for the patent in 1998, raising more questions that his is scientific work was geared toward his commercial ambition. The blatant manipulation that Andrew Wakefield is believed to have perpetrated, clearly shows his study was not intended as a robust piece of scientific research. A further report in the BMJ by Brian Deer, claims that Wakefield had planned to capitalise on the health scare with new medical tests and was in partnership with one of the test children’s father (Bmj.com