Preview

Animals Should Not Be Used for Medical Research in Malaysia

Best Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3309 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Animals Should Not Be Used for Medical Research in Malaysia
UUB 3023 | CRITICAL THINKING | WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT: ARGUMENTATIVE ESSAY NAME | : | SIFAJEE | TITLE | : | ANIMALS SHOULD NOT BE USED FOR CLINICAL RESEARCH IN MALAYSIA | Abstract
There is no doubt that throughout the centuries, animals have played a central role in medical research in Malaysia. Many of the treatments available for serious illnesses we have today have come from animal experimentation. There has been recorded that the use of animals in research has been going on as far back as the Greek writings. According to the history, Aristotle who lived in 384-322 BC was the first to use living animals in experiments; whereas Galen, a physician in second-century Rome, was known as the “father of vivisection” from his experiments on living pigs. However, these experiments were not conducted in the name of clinical research; they were done to gain knowledge about the animals themselves. In that period of time, man was not set next to animals in comparison of physiology or any other way because man was seen as a creature above the animal. From century to century, new ideas were developed when Darwin came with his theory of evolution. His theory made a path that linked human with animals; and encouraged researches to be done on different animals to learn how human physiology worked. Even though many believed animal experimentation is important for clinical study, some claimed that it is against the humanity. Many debates have been carried out to argue whether the animal testing is crucial or cruel. The writer believes though many have heard of this matter, yet people need to know about the adverse effects it plays in the toxicology field.

TABLE OF CONTENTS | | Page | | Abstract | 2 | | Table of Contents | 3 | | Introduction | 4 | | Argument 1 | 5 | | Argument 2 | 7 | | Counter Argument & Refutation | 9 | | Conclusion & Recommendations | 13 | | References | 15 |

Introduction
Toxicology is the scientific study of



References: * Dappleshade, Debate.org (2012). Animal Testing should be Banned. Retrieved from http://www.debate.org/debates/Animal-testing-should-be-banned/1/ * Kristina Cook (April 4,2006) * Laura Blue (June 17, 2008). How Much Does Animal Testing Tell Us?.Retrieved from http://www.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1815241,00.html * Lee Bowman, Scripps Howard News Service (2011). Animal Testing: Crucial or Cruel?. Retrieved from http://www.abc15.com/dpp/news/national/animal-testing%3A-crucial-or-cruel * LithiumQueen, Mibba Creative Writing (2010). The Cruelty of Animal Testing. Retrieved from http://www.mibba.com/Articles/Science/3703/The-Cruelty-of-Animal-Testing/ * The Society of Toxicology (2006). Animals in Research: The Importance of Animals in the Science of Toxicology. Retrieved from http://www.toxicology.org/ai/air/AIR_Final.pdf * Wanda Embar (2008)

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Wanda Embar, the author of this website writes about the consequences and effects of animal testing. Wanda also provides facts and history of how these animals have been treated and experimented on in the past. This website gives detailed procedures and examples of what the animals have gone through and how badly they are being mistreated. It also gives multiple cases of where animal testing was strictly unreliable and caused great misfortune among many communities that relied on this deceptive experiment outcome. This website also applies the exact companies including their involvement in the controversy. The source provides graphic pictures exhibiting the condition of the animals undergoing experimentation which provides a brief overview…

    • 145 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal testing is cruel and barbaric. In the article "A change of heart about animals" by Jeremy Rifkin, featured in the los Angeles Times, Rifkin discussed how scientists have discovered that animals are not far different from humans. The studies show that animals have similar emotions and reactions when experiencing such emotions in times of distress or fear. Despite these finding, animals are still continually tested on for products and other experiments in order to see what the result would be.…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Animal testing, also known as animal experimentation, or in vivo testing, often uses non-human animals in experiments to test the safety of products and has been a topic of heated debate for decades. Although some research uses animals only for natural behaviors observation, F. Barbara Orlans claimed in her book, In the Name of Science: Issues in Responsible Animal Experimentation, that more than sixty percent of all animals used in animal testing suffer from experiment procedure or even get killed in biomedical research and product-safety testing. On the one hand, successful animal testing can lead to medical cures and treatments for human beings, on the other hand, opponents are doubting the reliability of animal…

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The “Three R’s” are a crucial component of both animal testing and the greater picture of animal cruelty. While the anti-animal testing individuals view the “Three R’s” as the foundation to justice for animals, proponents for animal testing continue to believe that these three steps do not have the power or depth to create a new process that leads to the same medical and cosmetic discoveries. In spite of pro-animal testing individuals viewpoints on the “Three R’s”, opponents easily rejoinder their views by showing the depth of refining, reducing, and replacing animal testing. Refinement can be achieved by using techniques that are not as intrusive and providing the animal better living conditions during the testing. Many animals are confined…

    • 216 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    All of my life I have had a tremendous amount of passion for all animals, and in most instances I've found that I have felt more comfortable around them than I do people, finding myself drawn to their many personable qualities, such as innocence, loyalty, lack of judgment, and overall cheerful disposition. As I have grown, my care for animals and their well being has as well, and my eyes have been opened to the horrors taking place all throughout the globe involving poor, innocent animals, who are unable to defend themselves, against the very people they are meant to find companionship with. The controversy over the practice of utilizing animals for the purposes of testing has been an issue for the past 30-40 years, and with it, comes the moral debate. However, the topic of ongoing question, whether animal testing is right or wrong, lies within your own personal morals.…

    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When it comes to the topic of animal testing, most of us will readily agree that it is a debatable topic. Where this argument usually ends, however, is on the conversation if animal testing is necessary. Whereas some are convinced that using animals for testing has contributed to many lifesaving cures and treatments, others maintain that these animals are very different from humans and, therefore, make poor test subjects. My own view is these animals have produced many treatments, but not outcomes that are effective enough in the human body, therefore should not be using animals.…

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1984 By George Orwell

    • 1241 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In the late 1500s English physician William Harvey revolutionized physiology and relied on knowledge gathered from animal experiments to learn more about humans. Today, biomedical research throughout the U.S. has recorded using several million animal test subjects per year. Why are these numbers so high? One reason is because the Food and Drug Administration requires all new medicine in the United States to be tested on animals before moving on to human trials. Starting with the Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty in England in the early 1800s, animal rights groups have formed to fight for the ban against animal testing (Fellenz, Marc R).…

    • 1241 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the 1930s, Hitler passed anticruelty laws against animals in Germany. This seems strange considering the way Hitler treated humans during World War II. Various life-saving procedures have been discovered and perfected by animal testing. “How would you feel if the one research project that may save your child’s life was priced out of existence because pound animals were banned from testing” (Rowan 93). Without animal testing, humans would have to face the negative effects drugs and products can have before being perfected for human use. Some think animal testing is cruel although the provides endless advances.…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal Testing Outline

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Bibliography: Smith, T.(1998, March). Animal Testing - Alternatives - Cruelty-Free Living. All For Animals Newsletter. Issue #1.…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Persuasive Paper

    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages

    References: (n.d.). Animal testing is bad science:point/counterpoint . Retrieved from peta.org (n.d.). Alternatives to animal testing. Retrieved from peta.org (n.d.). Cruelty to animals in laboratories . Retrieved from peta.org (n.d.). Information about animal testing . Retrieved from peta.org…

    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Animal Testing should be banned due to its cruelness, moral issues and the existence of effective alternative methods.…

    • 2162 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Animal Testing Is Wrong 1

    • 2184 Words
    • 9 Pages

    “Animal Experimentation.” Current Issues: Macmillan Social Science Library. Detroit: Gale, 2010. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. Web. 21 Mar. 2012. <http://ic.galegroup.com.ezproxy.deltacollege.edu/ic/ovic/ReferenceDetailsPage/ReferenceDetailsWindow?displayGroupName=Reference&disableHighlighting=true&action=e&windowstate=normal&catId=GALE%7C00000000LVV7&documentId=GALE%7CPC3021900014&mode=view&userGroupName=sjdc_main&jsid=c74797a1a820ad84f30dde1c4e7b5c51>…

    • 2184 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In today’s society, many people debate whether or not using animals in research is humane. An estimated 26 million animals are used every year in the United States for scientific and commercial testing. [2] Proponents of animal testing state that it has enabled the development of numerous life-saving treatments for both humans and animals, while opponents state that animal testing is cruel and often yields irrelevant results because animals are so different from human beings. Many different animals are used in scientific studies such as rabbits, mice, primates, dogs, cats, pigs, and cows. I believe that animal testing is beneficial because it provides opportunities to improve the lives of both humans and animals.…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Have you ever visited an old cemetery? Have you also read the head stones and said to yourself wow the men women and children sure did die at a young age. I know I have and I am very thankful that I am alive today instead of back in the 1800 and early 1900s. The medical breakthroughs we have made as a society are incredible. It is all due to the fact that we allow and perform testing on animals. With all these discoveries we are living longer and finding more cures to diseases.…

    • 2640 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Testing on animals is like testing on your baby sister, it is wrong and inhumane. “But precisely because our way of life depends on exploiting them, animals don’t really have any significant “rights” in America, although Congress passed the Humane Methods of Slaughter Action of 1958 (Motavalli 26).” Animals in America should have just as many rights as humans, the Human Methods of…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics