In her article, “Shitty First Drafts”, Anne Lamott writes about how having “shitty first drafts” is one of the key components of the writing process. She believes that writing a “shitty” first draft will lead to writers writing “good second drafts” and “terrific third drafts.” Lamott illustrates through her experiences as a food critic that writing does not always come easily. In order for there to be a “terrific” final piece of work, the writer needs to first allow for the words and thoughts to come flowing out without restriction. Lamott explains that she would go to the restaurant to review them numerous amounts of times with her friends. She would then write down her friends’ opinionated words about the restaurant. Here she was writing…
In this child’s draft of just visions and impulsive thoughts, she lets it all gush out and let it slope all over the place, thinking that only yourself are going to see it and shape the draft later. After cutting out lines and phrases that she doesn’t need, she would continue on to rewriting a better second draft. She used to write food reviews for a California magazine; from there, the writer learned a lot that food reviewing was not only typing and commenting on the food but it also need a clear structure of explanation. Lastly, Lamott tells readers that this whole rough drafts process is just a persisting cycle, and it will soon happen again. If I use some of these techniques that Lamott mentioned in this paper, then maybe I can begin to have some comfort when writing my first draft and to create wonderful pieces of art that are out of my potential. No matter how “shitty” the first copy may be,…
Lamott explains how writing for her is like creating a present for someone. She wrote most of her stories based on her experiences such as her father’s death, her friend Pammy’s death, and her son witnessing the death of a friend’s baby. For finding your own voice, writers should use their own material and experiences to shape the style they want. Though having an author that you look up to is ok, writers often times try to sound like the author they admire and it doesn’t help make their work original or unique. Lamott says there are two things that put her in the spirit to give: giving a book to a patient in the hospital and being given a book by other writers and then writing a book back to them. I like how she connects giving to writing…
The essay entitled, Perfectionism was an inspiring piece, discussing that of which haunts all writers: perfect writing. The over all though of perfectionism seemed to be that it was a curse but one that could be over come. Perfectionism seemed to focus more on acceptance of mistakes, and enjoying the process instead of forcing a perfect product. Lamott's Shitty First Drafts, to me seemed more focused on a subtopic of perfectionism. Letting the urge to write carry you, type whatever it is the story demands of you then... simply fix it up later.…
I believe what Margaret Atwood is trying to convey is, there is no such thing as perfection, not even in writing. If we wait on perfection we will never get anything done. There is only one who is perfect, can I get an amen on that class. Free writing has always been my best brainstoming technique, and the writing just seems to flow, and boy, it is far from perfect, but it contains greatness. Never let perfection stop you, let it help you to improve by stretching for it.…
The overall thesis of Lamott’s essay is about the drafting process, or more particularly the process of writing a first draft. In regard to the overall tone throughout the essay; Lamott’s tone striked me as being dry, sarcastic, and humorous, which made it much more enjoyable to read. In addition, I also think that Lamott was suggesting that the process of writing a first draft is more important than the final product, which I completely agree with. For example, when I write my first drafts I tend to “free write” and zip through it, not caring for grammatical correctness until I feel I have written enough. Although, I sometimes stop to gawk by how horrible my first drafts are, although this is probably due to my compulsive…
After completing the Composition I class with Mrs. Gelwicks, I have learned many things about writing and also about myself. Three key takeaway points that I inherited, include the importance of time management, peer revision, and putting “heart” into each paper I write. Gaining confidence in my writing skills during this class has made me feel prepared for writing papers in college.…
Identifying the specific successful moves made by others increases the number of arrows in your quiver, ready for use when you sit down to start your own writing. Likewise, identifying the missteps in other writers’ work makes you better at identifying the missteps in your own.…
In the book Bird By Bird by Anne Lamott, the author takes the reader through a crash course in writing a story. I found the book helpful in many ways. However, I also found a plethora of information that I will never use and didn’t need to read. Instead of giving tips on how to write college papers, which is what I was looking for, the author went in depth about the life of an author. The three most important things I took from this book were; the importance of getting things down on paper, the concepts of shitty first drafts and short assignments, and using index cards for note taking.…
In “The Author to Her Book” Anne Bradstreet presents a false sense of humility in her extended metaphor where she personifies her very own book as her child, calling it “ill-form’d offspring of my feeble brain” (3). The author is practically saying her work is trash and that she isn’t good enough. This false sense of humility is common with authors, especially during that time when women weren’t considered capable of coming up with a good piece of writing. Bradstreet is not only self-deprecating her work, but also unveils her clear attachment to her work “Who after birth didst by my side remain” (4) until it was snatched by “friends, less wise than true” (5) “Who thee abroad, expos’d to public view”(6) meaning her friends acted indiscreetly…
In The Maker’s Eye: Revising Your Own Manuscript, Murray says, “Writers must learn to be their own worst…
Within the rough draft of my first paper, my feedback was a sea of red marks concerning passive voice, commas, informality, and even small preposition errors (A Cracked Case of English Inability). Seeing that first grade of a 65, I knew I was in for a wide awakening. I wasn’t used to having to take my time to organize my thoughts and write an outline. Usually given a specific…
I have come across some people's writing that was just awful. It was a good story and may have had potential, but it was very poorly written and seemed as though they wrote it once and never looked at it again. If you are writing a piece that you are serious about, especially if you want to publish it, you need to make sure that it is perfect. Print it up, if possible, and read through it a few days after you wrote it. Analyze it and make sure it's perfect. Then have someone else that you trust go through it as well.…
As an extremely well versed (OK, modest) critic of English Literature and a fairly decent judge of people and character, I have chosen to write my critique, or paper, on a particularly good (a brewing controversy in some circles) author of the times. This particular author was born in Steventon, Hampshire, England on December 16, 1775 to a loving, well-educated, mother and father (1, page 1). Her loving parents did welcome this seventh (of eight) children and last of two daughters into the world with loving arms. One of the first more obvious facts in her writing is that, although her father had a modest income (around £600 yearly) (4, page 2) she was a spoiled, little brat who was well, perhaps too well, taken care of. That is, at least, what shows in her writings. I bring up this point to demonstrate that her parents truly loved her and the other children and tried their best to do what every parent wants to do with their children. Give them a better life than they had. This can be argued because she was one of eight children in the family that turned out some fairly successful kids. That and, £600 a year was not a lot of money for the time. Her other siblings did extremely well in most of their endeavors. This fact could have very easily have caused some dissension or even jealously between her and her siblings. A fact that is at same time well proven by her writings. There is some indication of this in her surviving letters to her closest confidante, her only sister (4, page 4). All of the aforementioned material, in fact, her very life, is probably the main reason that I, and thousands of normal, law-abiding men from all over the world, dread any lesson plan that includes my chosen author. At the same time, if she hadn 't had this life, they we dread so much, then we might have been deprived of such great works as Emma, Sense and Sensibility, Pride and Prejudice, and Northanger Abbey. With…
The writing process is not something someone can just sit down and do. The writer usually does not write in phases, they usually jump around from on phase to another. Peter Elbow and Donald Murray write about the importance of free writing and revising phases of the transformation from inspiration to craft, and how these phases give writing a voice throughout the writing process and how editing can be hinder the process of inspiration to craft.…