Surely, the proposed law spreads around nice words such as responsibility, healthcare, freedom, choice, development, rights, equality, couples, etc. Yet, it is nothing but an attempt to remove God from our government and society. When I told a friend that lines, he answered: “grabe naman kasi kayo, masyado kayong overreacting, masyado nyong ginagawang literal ang mga sciptures. sa sobrang pagkaliteral, yung mga sentiments na rinerelease nila, wala na sa lugar… hindi naman sa masyado kong crinicriticize pero you’re going beyond limits… kung walang RH Bill, kaya bang pakainin ng simbahan lahat ng mga batang dadagdag sa listahan ng mahihirap sa buong Pilipinas? kaya ba nilang ipagamot? kaya nilang pag-aralin, as in lahat?” Yeah, I know. It’s really hard to reply to that, lalo na at opinyon nya yun. I just ask him, “don’t you think the bill will legalized abortion?” “Finance everyone’s freedom to have sex responsibility. We can support RH Bill and implements parental responsibility and still be a good Catholic,” he answered callously. When it comes to this part, we started to have different views toward it. And it is always a constant reminder that, we should read first the entire proposed bill before giving reactions. As for my own opinion, not because I’m Catholic or because of what the scriptures tell us, I really can’t accept the part wherein they give free condoms (to high school students) to those out of wedlock. “There’s only two words much better than condom and pills for you (esp. the teens today) it’s called wedding ring. All of us for sure are pro-life! Maybe some can’t because of poverty and great responsibility. Come to think of it, the bill cannot be pro-life because of many sections in the bill that promote harm than health, promote injustice rather that a greater good, and do not respect the solemn union of spouses in marriage. I just realized that being an anti means PRO-QUALITY LIFE. No, I’m
Surely, the proposed law spreads around nice words such as responsibility, healthcare, freedom, choice, development, rights, equality, couples, etc. Yet, it is nothing but an attempt to remove God from our government and society. When I told a friend that lines, he answered: “grabe naman kasi kayo, masyado kayong overreacting, masyado nyong ginagawang literal ang mga sciptures. sa sobrang pagkaliteral, yung mga sentiments na rinerelease nila, wala na sa lugar… hindi naman sa masyado kong crinicriticize pero you’re going beyond limits… kung walang RH Bill, kaya bang pakainin ng simbahan lahat ng mga batang dadagdag sa listahan ng mahihirap sa buong Pilipinas? kaya ba nilang ipagamot? kaya nilang pag-aralin, as in lahat?” Yeah, I know. It’s really hard to reply to that, lalo na at opinyon nya yun. I just ask him, “don’t you think the bill will legalized abortion?” “Finance everyone’s freedom to have sex responsibility. We can support RH Bill and implements parental responsibility and still be a good Catholic,” he answered callously. When it comes to this part, we started to have different views toward it. And it is always a constant reminder that, we should read first the entire proposed bill before giving reactions. As for my own opinion, not because I’m Catholic or because of what the scriptures tell us, I really can’t accept the part wherein they give free condoms (to high school students) to those out of wedlock. “There’s only two words much better than condom and pills for you (esp. the teens today) it’s called wedding ring. All of us for sure are pro-life! Maybe some can’t because of poverty and great responsibility. Come to think of it, the bill cannot be pro-life because of many sections in the bill that promote harm than health, promote injustice rather that a greater good, and do not respect the solemn union of spouses in marriage. I just realized that being an anti means PRO-QUALITY LIFE. No, I’m