Preview

Anti-Whaling

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
689 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Anti-Whaling
A parable tells of three blind men confronted by an elephant. One touches the leg, and concludes the elephant is built like a tree. The next grasps the trunk and believes the elephant to be a giant snake. The third strokes the side, and describes a solid wall.
A parallel exists here with the controversy over commercial whaling. No matter how long or hard proponents and opponents debate the subject, they never seem to be looking at the same animal.
There are, of course, several aspects which have to be brought into perspective - ethical, cultural, scientific and political - and objectivity is inevitably compromised by one's order of priorities.
It is also in the nature of believers in causes to practice selective myopia, intentionally or otherwise seeing only those "facts" which support their particular foregone conclusions.
Japan is a proponent of whaling, and stands accused of bending facts to suit its ends as much as anyone. Unfortunately though, many of Japan's accusers outside the scientific community have little understanding of whom or what they are really opposing. I say "unfortunate" not only for misrepresented Japan, but also for the conservation movement which, by spreading misinformation, has stabbed itself in the foot.
The fragile footing on which much opposition is founded is then shored up by misleading journalism. In an age when we are inclined to revere the printed word as gospel truth, it is little wonder that an already complex scientific dispute has become further clouded by emotions fueled by inaccurate insinuation.
It is, for example, widely believed by the general public in the West that Japan flagrantly ignores the International Convention of Regulation of Whaling (ICRW), established in 1946. This is not true.
The controversy recently reached a zenith with the launch by Japan of a scientific whaling program. (Again, the media like to put "scientific" in quotations. This implies "Believe that, if you can!", while exonerating the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    It has always been known to Japan as it’s “whaling town.” This countries’ history dates…

    • 2311 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Norwegian and the Japanese contradict the ban on international whaling commission on whale hunting, which render their point of argument baseless; therefore, placing ban on whale hunting does not violate the sovereignty of the Norwegian and that of the Japanese Nations in anyway, this ban result to the negative impact of globalization. As that being said, every countries needs to properly adjust their interest to the interest of other country, because that is the aim and objective of a peaceful neighborhood in a globalized…

    • 86 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Acct Project 2

    • 1928 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Many social organizations tried to let people to stop whaling activities, such as World Wildlife Fund (WWF), International Whaling Commission (IWC), Greenpeace, etc. Those organizations are all nonprofit organizations which stated the importance of whale protection. In recent years, whaling forbidding has achieved a great success. Most of world traditional whaling countries signed to end their “commercial whaling activities” except three countries, those are: Japan, Iceland and Norway.…

    • 1928 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Blackfish Analysis

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The article attempts to discredit "Blackfish", stating that “Sea World does not collect Killer Whales in the wild, and has not done so in over 35 years”, which has a couple of slight problems. Sea World just states it does not collect killer whales from the wild; however, their statement that they have not done so in over 35 years implies that at one point, over 35 years ago, they actually did collect killer whales from the wild, which means their first part of the statement is a lie! As a result they have are now losing credibility with their readers and should act fast to rebuild some credibility with the reader. However they fail to do so with their next statement. Next they state “Tilikum was not collected by us. And the collections four decades ago were conducted in compliance with federal laws”. This statement raises multiple issues with their argument. Sea World might not have been the ones to capture Tilikum out of the wild but they did buy him for their amusement park and directly supported the killer whale catching industry with their purchase. Secondly they just stated that forty years ago they did capture killer whales from the wild and are defending themselves stating that it is okay because it was legal at the time. Just because something is legal does not make it morally right. Sea World attempts to manipulate the truth…

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The documentary, The Cove, is a film which demonstrates the cruelty and abuse done to the Dolphins, held captive in a Japanese Lagoon. After, discovering more about the intelligence, advancement and innocence the dolphins possess, I began to agree more with Ric O’Barry argument that dolphins should not be hunted in Japan and the world.…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    This documentary is of great importance for the activists and for the people to learn about dolphin slaughter. Despite the use of images and data to show information, this documentary is not completely accurate and credible in all aspects because it is told from an ocean conservationist’s point of view, which affects the portrayal given to the Japanese. The Cove serves as propaganda against dolphin slaughter and encourages viewers to take action about this…

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Whaling has been a Japanese tradition, which goes back to prehistoric times, so Japan has a strong historical connection with the sea as a source of food. But there are other countries that used to have such a connection to the sea as well, for example France and the US. Those countries ‘set sail’ to whaling or limited their whale hunts when the IWC put a ban on commercial whaling back in 1986. So Japan has no traditional reason to keep up the whale hunt. A country cannot, or may not keep up something like this just because it is a tradition.…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The first part of the article is all about the effort to stop whaling and how they have come up with a new way of tracing the import/export of whale meat. Then they start talking about how the governments and Japan and Norway have been actively resistant to efforts to inspect their markets and do the testing. Then it is said that some of the other countries think the band on Japan and Norway should be lifted so they can still enjoy whale meat. You read about how the anti- whaling effort has been nearly completely blocked by differences of opinion in the IWC and with the whalers.…

    • 283 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Makah and Whaling

    • 2207 Words
    • 9 Pages

    But governments have always sought ways to circumvent international agreements that attempt to create protected areas or species. Thus, a ban on the catch of blue whales in the Antarctic, was presented the proposal to declare a subspecies, the dwarf blue whale, that this was not…

    • 2207 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    While they are not an endangered species, they are hunted mercilessly by the fish industry especially off the coasts of China, Japan and parts of the North Pacific by the Russians (Ivashchenko 73). This extreme hunting has left the oceans with an unknown number of whales and thus, keeping them in facilities such as SeaWorld helps to replenish their numbers. However, since SeaWorld no longer catches or buys wild whales and instead breeds them for the very purpose of continuing the gene pool as Hardgrove describes in his book, it doesn’t help any animals still left in the wild. In fact, having such high numbers in captivity, while still allowing whaling practices to continue, we encourage whaling to go on. We can’t both praise whale captivity, and leave whales in nature to fend for themselves if we are really worried about…

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    makah whaling

    • 351 Words
    • 1 Page

    Hunting whales have been an important part of the culture and survival of the Makah tribe for 1500 years. The Makah claim that that their right to hunt and harvest whales is secured in the treaty of Neah Bay, signed in 1855 by the US. Government. Many Makah feel that their health problems result in some degree, to the loss of their traditional diet of seafood and marine mammal meat. However the American society admires whales as remarkable mammals. Many people are concerned for their suffering during whaling operations and most oppose any form of whaling. They fear that the Makah will sell the meat to japan. The Makah hunt is being used by Japanese and other as evidence that whale populations globally are strong enough to end the ban on commercial whaling.…

    • 351 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Oscar winning documentary film “The Cove”, directed by Louie Psihoyos, exposes the annual massacre of 23,000 small cetaceans in the National Park Taiji, Japan. Even though the trade of dolphins whether using them alive for entertainment purposes is unethical and selling their toxic meat is dangerous for the health, the Japanese authorities are supporting it with all possible means. The Japanese government is not only preventing any publicity about the dolphin slaughter, but it is also bribing the International Whaling Committee, which is supposed to control the trade of cetaceans and protect the rights of the marine mammals. Consequently, the crew of volunteers led by the ex-dolphin trainer and current animal rights activist Ric O’Barry is prevented from legally filming the fisher men at Taiji. “Armed” with sophisticated technology, the volunteers risk their safety, and despite the fishermen harassing them, and the police following them one step behind, successfully document the brutal killing of the dolphins.…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    The government of Japan justifies the right for whaling by asserting that there is an apparent interconnectedness between whale hunting nowadays and whaling practises carried during the 17th century (Morikawa 2009:19-20). However, a closer examination reveals that only since the 19th century with the introduction of the effective Norwegian method of whaling the consumption of whale meat increased. In other words, since this innovation, the nature of whaling altered and transformed into an exclusive industry (Watanabe 2009:99-100). Although whale hunting in Japan had been performed earlier in the past, some strong evidence suggests that it has no connection with the nowadays largely condemned practise of commercial whaling. The amounts of whale meat consumed formerly were limited to the particular fishery communities. In other words, it can be concluded that the ‘continuity between traditional and…

    • 2215 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    The viewing of whaling today is almost exactly the same as it was back in the 1800's. But it is viewed that way for a different reason. The reason it is viewed that way is because certain species of whales are on the brink of extinction but the whalers are not taking that into consideration when they are going out and hunting these…

    • 139 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Informative Speech

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages

    "Whaling." Issues & Controversies On File: n. pag. Issues & Controversies. Facts On File News Services, 10 Apr. 2006. Web. 16 January 2012…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics