Preview

Antony Versus Brutus 'Speech In Shakespeare's Julius Caesar'

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
602 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Antony Versus Brutus 'Speech In Shakespeare's Julius Caesar'
The Last Cut Hurts The Worst Why did Antony’s speech beat Brutus’s speech? Antony’s speech was better than Brutus’s speech because he hit the audience with Pathos (Emotion), unlike Brutus who used Logos (Logic) and Ethos (Ethics). Mankind are subjected to their emotions rather than thinking for themselves, and due to this Antony’s speech prevails Brutus’s speech. When Brutus spoke to the crowd, they understood what he was saying and trusted him. When Antony spoke, the crowd rose up in rage and was set on revenge, which had the opposite effect of Brutus’s speech. Brutus could’ve won the argument but he made some mistakes that derailed his plans. When the conspirators killed Julius Caesar, they should’ve kept Antony with Julius and not …show more content…
When Antony was speaking with the common folk, he addressed them as if he was one of them, which made them think that he was a simple man(III, ii, 72). When Antony was talking about the conspirators he acted like he was praising them but he was being sarcastic(III, ii, 81-82). He had to make it super obvious or else they wouldn’t have picked up on it. Antony shows that the conspirators were wrong to the people so he can get the people on his side and bring coas to Rome(III, ii, 95-98). For the final blow to deliver the argument home, he shows the people the spot where Brutus stabbed Julius(III, ii, 171-173). The Roman people were so dim witted that they believed that was were Brutus stabbed Caesar, but Antony wasn’t there and the crowd didn’t know it so they believed him.
From the details shown above, it proves that Antony’s speech was better than Brutus’s speech. Antony won because he hit them from the emotion standpoint and didn’t think of them of how he thinks of himself. Brutus lost because he didn’t use emotion and he thought the Roman people were exactly like him. Antony knew how to play the people, Brutus didn’t so the Roman people turned on him. The Roman people are dim witted and can’t think for

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Mark Antony speech was more effective because he reminded the plebeians that Julius Caesar was not ambitious due to that fact he rejected the crown three times. Brutus tells the plebeians the reasoning behind why he were to kill Caesar - that if he were not to kill Caesar, then everyone would die as slaves. Then he said “But, as he was ambitious, I slew him. “(III,ii, 28). In other words, Brutus says the reasoning behind why he killed Caesar was due to the fact that Caesar was ambitious. However, when Mark Antony…

    • 1238 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Antony may have turned the crowd against Brutus in the end, but only had the…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What part does Brutus play in this? Brutus is a very loyal man, he was just more loyal to Rome. This was his downfall. When Brutus gave his speech he was very choppy and factual. The people believed him and called him the most noble man in Rome, but only for a while. After him was Mark Antony, Antony was persuasive and used more ethos than logos. This helped win the people’s hearts instead of their minds. Cassius, the deceitful leader of the conspirators,…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mark Antony deftly speaks to his audience in a way that requires them to challenge their preconceived characterizations of Brutus and Cassius. He intentionally expresses the deliberate opposite of what he genuinely wishes and excessively compliments the people to the point that they forget their own seemingly unwavering convictions. His finesse and dexterity in bending words and minds ultimately works to his favor. Antony accomplishes his initial goal to convince the Roman people to revenge Caesar’s demise. This achievement in and of itself exhibits…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Antony had the better of the two speeches in the play, “The Tragedy of Julius Caesar.” By William Shakespeare. Antony does a very good job of molding the crowds mind about Brutus and to even show his sympathy about the death of Caesar. Brutus knows that he will lose this battle with Antony, yet he holds onto the hope that maybe, just maybe, that the crowd will believe him instead of Antony. “Et tu…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The video we saw during class was interesting and it caught my attention since I can relate to what was being said. There was talk about Hispanic Americans and how each generation lived differently. But the main thing I took from the video was the idea of America being an international country; a nation of immigrants. However we must be careful to not assimilate into the masses to the point where we completely forget our heritage. It is our very heritage and culture which contribute to the country which makes our nation an international nation.…

    • 598 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Shakespeare's Julius Caesar, Decius Brutus and Mark Antony, both Roman Senators, eulogize Julius Caesar, each using a different technique and approach. Brutus, in a somewhat arrogant, to the point, eulogy, attempts to sway the people. He justifies conspiring against Caesar by stating that Caesar's ambition would have hurt Rome. However, in Antony's eulogy, he focuses on Caesar's positive traits, and cunningly disproves Brutus' justification for killing Caesar. The fickle Romans waver between leaders, responding emotionally, rather than intellectually, to the orators.<br><br>Brutus seeks to explain why he conspired against Caesar. He begins his speech with "Romans, countrymen ...", appealing to their consciousness as citizens of Rome, who,…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Antony loved Caesar and was completely against his murder, so he used rhetorical strategies to persuade the Romans to be against the perpetrators. For example when Antony says “Yet Brutus says he was ambitious, and Brutus is an honorable man” he is using the mix of sarcasm and logos. Antony repeats this same thing over and over again until the Romans start questioning if Brutus truly is an honorable man. His sarcasm and repetition were both great rhetorical tactics that were used to manipulate and confuse the Roman’s minds. Antony brings together the perfect amount of ethos and pathos when he states, “ ‘Tis his will. Let but the commons hear this testament- which pardon me, I do not mean to read- And they would go and kiss dead Caesar’s wounds And dip their napkins in his sacred blood,” (III,ii,127-132). This is essential because it shows that Antony is credible and trustworthy because he has Caesar’s will. This also appeals to the people’s emotions because they become saddened over Caesar’s death. Antony used his tactics to make the Romans trust him and his views, which led to them rioting against the perpetrators. His use of ethos, pathos, and logos convinced the people that the assassination of Caesar was a cruel act and that Brutus, Cassius, and the other perpetrators are…

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is often argued that Antony has the better speech. It is true that Antony did a good job persuading the crowd to go on a rampage. However, Antony is in the wrong, Antony shouldn’t be riling up the crowd to go on a rampage. He should be gathering them as one and uniting them in this time of peril. Brutus had the better speech because he did was right.…

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Everything that was said by Brutus was completely blown away by what Antony says even though he never said anything bad about Brutus. Brutus and Antony are both very good at ethos, pathos and logos, but with the length and persistence of Antony, he won the crowd. By the end of the speech the people of Rome wanted to kill everyone that was in the conspiracy including…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    All things considered have given Antony a great advantage over Brutus’ speech. While Brutus gave a lecture to the crowd, Antony was able to pour his true feelings and used smart diction to give himself credibility. Brutus’ confrontation of the people was uncomfortable, cheesy and awkward, while Antony was confident and clear about all of his points, changing the audience’s perspective to side with…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    rhetorical appeals

    • 363 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Mark Antony used the three persuasion tools to turn the roman crowd against Brutus. The most convincing use of ethos in Antony’s speech is in the first line of the speech; “Friends, Romans, countrymen, lend me your ears!” This shows that Mark Antony is trying to get in to the Roman crowd’s hearts. He uses rhetorical irony throughout the speech constantly questioning the ethos of Brutus. “When that the poor cried, Caesar hath wept; ambition should be made of sterner stuff: yet Brutus is an honorable man.” Mark Antony repeats the phrase “yet Brutus is an honorable man” then he says logical statement that proofs Caesar did nothing wrong. Which led the crowd to turn on Brutus, without Antony actually saying that what Brutus did was wrong. Mark Antony uses a lot of facts throughout the course of his speech. One of the key facts in his initial speech is; “When that the poor…

    • 363 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rhetorical Analysis

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages

    By depicting Brutus’ speech he starts to create doubt and begin to inquire about the logic behind Antony argument against the conspirators. Once he had aroused this feeling of doubt in the plebeians Antony was able to continue with his argument with much more strength and confidence. A point extremely important in Antony's eulogy is persuading the crowd to view Caesar not as a the ambitious man Brutus made him out to be. The evidence that Antony gave the crowd which persuaded them into believing that Caesar was not indeed ambitious, was that "He hath brought many captives home to Rome, / Whose ransoms did the general coffers fill/.. I thrice presented him.a kingly crown/ Which he did thrice refuse. Was this ambition?/ Yet Brutus says he…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both speeches are very reluctant and have a persuasive passion about each topic. Moreover, Brutus's speech is more eloquent than Antony's speech considering it talks about Caesar's honor and his wisdom. Both essays start off with "Romans, countrymen..." (III.ii.13) (III.ii.72) Antony's speech talks more about burying Caesar, instead of praising him like Brutus's speech. Which is why Brutus's speech is more persuasive than Antony's speech because Brutus talks about only great things about Caesar and uplifts his spirit, unlike Antony who downgrades on…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays