(Suggested writing time – 40 minutes)
Directions: The following question is based on the accompanying documents. (The documents have been edited for the purpose of this exercise.) Write your answer on the lined pages of the Section II free-response booklet.
This question is designed to test your ability to work with and understand historical documents.
Write an essay that:
Has a relevant thesis and supports that thesis with evidence from the documents.
Uses all of the documents.
Analyzes the documents by grouping them in as many appropriate ways as possible. Does not simply summarize the documents individually.
Takes into account the sources of the documents and analyzes the authors’ points of view.
Identifies and explains the need for at least two additional types of document.
You may refer to relevant historical information not mentioned in the documents.
1. Using the following documents, analyze relationships that existed between the Roman Empire and people the Romans considered barbarians.
Historical Background: The Roman Empire experienced constant interaction with numerous groups of so-called barbarians. Between c100 CE and the time of the fall of the Western Roman
Empire in 476 CE, Romans had contact with such varied groups as the Goths, Vandals,
Ostrogoths, Visigoths, and Huns.
Document 1
Source: Philostorgius, a Roman citizen and bishop in the early Christian Church. Excerpt from his work, Church History, written in the 400s CE.
Now the devout band of Christian prisoners [from the Roman Empire], living as they did among the barbarian Goths, converted many of them to the way of piety and persuaded them to adopt the Christian faith instead of pagan beliefs. Among these prisoners were the ancestors of Ulfila … It was this Ulfila who led the exodus of the pious ones, being the first bishop appointed among them.
Document 2
Source: Excerpt from the writings of a Roman historian, c300 CE.
Barbarians are driven by evil spirits; “possessed by demons”, who force them to commit the most terrible acts…incapable of living according to written laws and only reluctantly tolerating kings. … Their lust for gold is immense, their love of drink boundless. Barbarians are without restraint... [T]hey are given to gross personal hygiene… They run dirty and barefoot, even in the winter…They grease their blonde hair with butter and care not that it smells rancid… Their reproductive energy is inexhaustible; the Northern climate of their native land, with its long winter nights favors their fantastic urge to procreate…
Document 3
Source: Fragments of a glass cup found by archaeologists in territory that was once Roman-controlled Britain. The glass originated in Germanic lands.
Document 4
Source: Tacitus, a Roman historian; excerpt from his work, Germania, c98 CE.
They [the Germanic tribes] are particularly delighted by gifts from neighboring tribes, which are sent not only by individuals but also by the Roman government, such as choice steeds, heavy armor, and neck –chains. We have now taught them to accept money also. ….
The Germanic people who border our Empire value gold and silver for their commercial utility, and are familiar with, and show preference for, some of our coins. The tribes of the interior use the simpler and more ancient practice of the barter of commodities.
Document 5
Source: Excerpt from a letter by St. Caesarius of Arles, a bishop in the early Roman Christian Church, written to barbarian members of his congregation.
Dearly beloved, although we rejoice at this, to see you hasten faithfully to church, we are sad and we grieve because we know that some of you rather frequently go over to the ancient worship of idols like the pagans who have no God or grace of baptism. We have heard that some of you make vows to trees, pray to fountains, and practice diabolical prophesy.
Document 6
Source: Ammianus Marcellinus, a Roman historian; writing in c390 CE about the Battle of Adrianople, which was fought in 378 CE.
So now, with rage flashing in their eyes, the barbarians pursued our men, who were in a state of apathy, the warmth of their veins having deserted them. Many Roman soldiers were slain without knowing who killed them; some were overwhelmed by the mere weight of the crowd of barbarians which pressed upon them; and some were slain by wounds inflicted by their own comrades. The barbarians spared neither those who yielded nor those who resisted.
Besides these, many half slain lay blocking up the roads, unable to endure the torture of their wounds; and heaps of dead horses were piled up and filled the plain with their carcasses. At last a dark moonless night put an end to the lasting disaster which cost the Roman state so much.
Document 7
Source: Sculptural depiction of a Germanic barbarian found on a pedestal in the Roman-controlled border town of Mainz.
Document 8
Source: An unknown Roman writer commenting in the 300s CE on a decision made by Emperor Probus.
Emperor Probus took 16,000 German recruits, all of whom he scattered through the various provinces, incorporating bodies of fifty or sixty in the detachments or among the soldiers along the Roman Empire’s frontier, for he said that the aid that the Romans received from barbarian auxiliaries [supplementary military forces] must be felt but not seen.
Emperor Probus brought over many other barbarian tribes … they all broke faith … they roamed over well-nigh the entire world on foot or in ships and did no little damage to the glory of Rome.
Document 9
Source: Jordanes, a Roman bureaucrat who worked in Constantinople, c550 CE, writing about the Battle of Chalons fought in 451 CE.
The armies met … on the Catalaunian Plain. The battlefield was a plain rising by a sharp slope to a ridge, which both armies sought to gain… The Huns with their forces seized the right side of the plain. The Romans and their barbarian allies, theVisigoths, seized the left,... The two sides began a struggle for the as yet untaken crest.
Now Theodoric with the Visigoths held the right wing and Aetius with the Romans the left. They placed in the center Sangiban (who was in command of the Alani, another barbarian ally)… On the other side, the battle line of the Huns was so arranged that Attila and his bravest followers were stationed in the center.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Much of the Roman frontier followed the natural boundaries of the Rhine and Danube rivers across Europe. On the other side of these rivers were territories the Romans never brought under their control and tribal peoples such as the Goths, Franks, Vandals, and Huns. By the middle of the fourth century CE, many Roman governors had allowed these so-called “barbarians” to settle on the Roman side of the rivers, and Roman generals had even recruited many of the men as soldiers in their armies. However, the barbarians never assimilated fully into Roman culture. By the end of the century they started to wage a series of ferocious campaigns into Roman territory, eventually destroying the city of Rome itself.…
- 1909 Words
- 5 Pages
Powerful Essays -
This question is designed to test your ability to work with and understand historical documents.…
- 1939 Words
- 8 Pages
Good Essays -
3. What is the name of the tribes of Iron Age folk among whom Rome’s origins are to be found?…
- 427 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Rome, Constantinople, and the Barbarians begins by reaffirming that barbarians fit the epitomization of the external dimension because they were foreigners. Barbarians were the name the Grecko-Romans used when referring to non-Greek speakers. It was up to historians to ask whether the barbarians of the Christian era, the Goths, Vandals, Huns, other tribes, fit into this idea of unforeseeable “ruin from the outside.” Despite this idea of unforeseeable “ruin from the outside”, the barbarian invasions did not happen to an unsuspecting Roman empire. Rome was custom to having warlike tribesmen at its gates and could deal with them (Goffart 275). Barbarian tribes were portrayed under anachronistic names. The Goths…
- 339 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Part A — An essay that requires comparison and analysis of up to ten “documents” which can include texts, pictures, graphs, maps, etc.—DOCUMENT BASED QUESTION (DBQ)…
- 271 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The barbarians seem to be very barbaric. The term barbaros was the greek word for foreigners. The word barbaric means “evil”, they had an organized army. The barbarians were a nomadic group of people.…
- 415 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Analyzes documents by grouping them in at least three groups. A group must contain at least two documents. A fallacious grouping…
- 788 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
According to the Romans nomads were considered to be barbarians, however over time Romans began to develop nomadic customs which were no longer considered barbaric but civilized. To the Romans a ‘barbarian’ was anyone who was an outsider of their land, and in that case nomads were considered to be barbaric. Nomads are known as a small group of people that don’t have a permanent settlement, and travel and migrate from place to place. Nomadic people also had a different type of lifestyle from the Romans, for example the nomads hunted and gathered their food, and which was considered cave man like. Before the fall of Rome the Romans were considered to be civilized people with a respectable religion and culture, and after the nomads took over it turned out to be the same thing.…
- 708 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Imperial Rome, during the first century A.D. was expanding it's boundaries by adding new territories. They expanded into northern Europe and Britain and conquered or attempted to conquer various types of people. Based on my reading of Tacitus' The Agricola and The Germania, I have knowledge of the life and customs of the Britons, subject of the Agricola, and the Germans, subject of the Germania. This of course being the Romans, and more specifically Tacitus,' observation and view of these groups of people.…
- 923 Words
- 4 Pages
Better Essays -
Some of the social impacts of the “barbarians” on the empire were the dwindling population because of food shortages. For example, when the Vandals seized North Africa it halted the transportation of food supply to Rome. Also, as the different groups took over parts of the empire, they replaced the local’s culture with their own. When the Anglo-Saxons took over the Celtic region, they replaced the Celts’ language with their own. They also replaced Christianity with their own religious beliefs except in Wales and Ireland.…
- 140 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays -
Williams, Derek. The Reach of Rome: A History of the Roman Imperial Frontier 1st-5th Centuries A.D. New York: St.Martins Press, 1997.…
- 1630 Words
- 7 Pages
Best Essays -
Central Question: How did the Mongols accomplish the conquest of such a large territory within such a short period of time?…
- 1782 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
One thing that both Ward-Perkins and Heather can agree upon for a major contributing factor to the dissolution of the Roman Empire is the presence of barbarians. Both Ward-Perkins and Heather also agree that when the barbarians came along they got into a conflict with the Romana over land. In the text, the first question asks “Recent scholarship has argued…
- 724 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
*The actual documents (what you will be using as evidence in your papers) are in the boxes.…
- 1454 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Some of these have been edited for the purpose of this task. This question is…
- 711 Words
- 3 Pages
Powerful Essays