Appropriate Dispute Resolution
WIN – WIN OUTCOME UNDER
Appropriate Dispute Resolution (ADR)
Prepared by: Yohannes Tesfaye Keleta
ID. No. CLG/UD/0109/01
E-mail yohannestesfaye42@yahoo.com
Advisor: Zelalem Debebe
Submitted:- In fulfillment of the requirements for the L.L.B. Degree at the Faculty of LAW
Mekele University
November, 2013
Acknowledgement
I would, whole heartedly, thank Librarians Behailu, Shewaye, Zelalem and all staff members at Addis Ababa Law Library who fully cooperated with me in accomplishing this paper. I would also thank Tariku, Aklilu, Derege, Eyasu, Abebe, Alula and all staff members at International Leadership Library who are all the time willing to help me with my studies.
My special thanks also goes to Ato Egigu Kidane who allows me to regularly work at his school and pursue my university studies at the same time.
Finally, I am very grateful to my advisor Ato Zelalem Debebe for his exemplary approach in helping me complete this paper on Win-Win Outcome Under Appropriate Dispute Resolution (ADR).
Table of Contents
Chapter One: General Overview of Appropriate Dispute Resolution (ADR)
1.1 Introduction 1
1.2 The meaning and Background of Dispute Resolution (ADR) 6
1.3 Advantages and Demerits of ADR
Chapter Two: Appropriate Dispute Resolution Mechanisms 11
2.1 Negotiation 12
2.2 Mediation 26
2.3 Conciliation 35
2.4 Compromise 38
2.5 Arbitration 42
Chapter Three: Commercial Arbitration 56
3.1 Power Duty Qualification and Replacement of Arbitrators 56
3.2 Arbitration Proceedings 58
3.3 Arbitration Award and Enforcement 59
Conclusion and Recommendation 60
Endnotes 64
Chapter One
1.1 Introduction
This paper is based on the writer’s seventeen months long of legal case based extremely disappointing court experience on the three levels of the country’s Federal Courts.
A dispute is a problem to be solved together, rather than a combat to
Appropriate Dispute Resolution (ADR)
Prepared by: Yohannes Tesfaye Keleta
ID. No. CLG/UD/0109/01
E-mail yohannestesfaye42@yahoo.com
Advisor: Zelalem Debebe
Submitted:- In fulfillment of the requirements for the L.L.B. Degree at the Faculty of LAW
Mekele University
November, 2013
Acknowledgement
I would, whole heartedly, thank Librarians Behailu, Shewaye, Zelalem and all staff members at Addis Ababa Law Library who fully cooperated with me in accomplishing this paper. I would also thank Tariku, Aklilu, Derege, Eyasu, Abebe, Alula and all staff members at International Leadership Library who are all the time willing to help me with my studies.
My special thanks also goes to Ato Egigu Kidane who allows me to regularly work at his school and pursue my university studies at the same time.
Finally, I am very grateful to my advisor Ato Zelalem Debebe for his exemplary approach in helping me complete this paper on Win-Win Outcome Under Appropriate Dispute Resolution (ADR).
Table of Contents
Chapter One: General Overview of Appropriate Dispute Resolution (ADR)
1.1 Introduction 1
1.2 The meaning and Background of Dispute Resolution (ADR) 6
1.3 Advantages and Demerits of ADR
Chapter Two: Appropriate Dispute Resolution Mechanisms 11
2.1 Negotiation 12
2.2 Mediation 26
2.3 Conciliation 35
2.4 Compromise 38
2.5 Arbitration 42
Chapter Three: Commercial Arbitration 56
3.1 Power Duty Qualification and Replacement of Arbitrators 56
3.2 Arbitration Proceedings 58
3.3 Arbitration Award and Enforcement 59
Conclusion and Recommendation 60
Endnotes 64
Chapter One
1.1 Introduction
This paper is based on the writer’s seventeen months long of legal case based extremely disappointing court experience on the three levels of the country’s Federal Courts.
A dispute is a problem to be solved together, rather than a combat to
References: 5. Ethiopian Civil Procedure Code, 1965. 6. F.D.R.E Constitution, 1995.