Preview

Arbitration vs. Mediation

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2867 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Arbitration vs. Mediation
To start, we thought it would appropriate to remind everybody about the basics of arbitration, its purpose and general characteristics. At its core, arbitration is the private, judicial determination of a dispute, by an independent third party. An arbitration hearing may involve the use of an individual arbitrator or a tribunal. A tribunal may consist of any number of arbitrators though some legal systems insist on an odd number for obvious reasons of wishing to avoid a tie. One and three are the most common numbers of arbitrators. The disputing parties hand over their power to decide the dispute to the arbitrator(s). Arbitration is an alternative to court action (litigation), and generally, just as final and binding (unlike mediation, negotiation and conciliation which are non-binding).
As we already know, the object of arbitration is to obtain a fair resolution of disputes by an impartial third party without unnecessary expense or delay. Parties should be free to agree how their disputes are resolved; subject only to such safeguards as are necessary in the public interest, free from the interference of judicial courts.
Arbitrators, or Tribunal members, are commonly appointed by one of three means:
1. Directly by the disputing parties (by mutual agreement, or by each party appointing one arbitrator)
2. By existing tribunal members (For example, each side appoints one arbitrator and then the arbitrators appoint a third)
3. By an external party (For example, the court or an individual or institution nominated by the parties)
Classifications Of Arbitration.
1. Commercial Arbitration is the most common of disputes. Just as it sounds, it is a dispute between two commercial enterprises.
2. Consumer Arbitration surrounds disputes between a consumer and a supplier of goods or services.
3. Labor Arbitration involves the settlement of employment related disputes.
Such as classification is important as we will later see that, depending on the area of law in which

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The arbitrator decides the rules, weighs the facts and arguments of both parties, and then decides the dispute. Arbitration may be voluntary or mandatory. ( naca.net)…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hsc300 Unit 4

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages

    7. Dispute Resolution: Where and how disputes between parties will be resolved; with courts and arbitration will be used…

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Arbitration is a relatively fast way to arrive upon a decision when two parties are in a dispute. Arbitration has definite benefits such as being flexible and not as formal as a traditional courthouse. Usually, arbitration can be scheduled quicker and with less working parts than a trial. In rare instances, if all parties involved come to an agreement, arbitrators can sometimes create rulings that judges are not allowed to decide. In arbitration, both sides present all evidence to an arbitrator in efforts to prove each side’s case. The arbitrator reaches a final verdict and decides whom the winners and losers are. An arbitrator does the job that a traditional judge or jury would normally do in court if the matter escalated to that point (Hill…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Most common forms of ADR which are available are – Negotiation (It is a simple procedure in which parties involved in dispute discuss with each other to reach a voluntary settlement.),Mediation (In this method, the parties use a mediator to propose a settlement of their dispute), Arbitration ( In it, the parties chooses a third party to hear evidence and testimony and then decide the dispute), Mini-trial (In it, lawyers from both parties present their case to representatives of each party so that parties can know strengths and weaknesses of their cases.), Fact-finding(the parties employs a neutral third party who act as fact-finder for the investigation of case and the information investigated by Fact-finder can be used in negotiating settlement.), Using a Judicial Referee (With the parties agreement, the court may appoint a judicial referee to conduct a private trial and give a judgment and their decisions stand as judgments of the court). (Cheeseman,…

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Kauffman T M1 A3

    • 943 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The various laws that govern arbitration in the United States and Russia are as follows: New York Convention, Federal Arbitration Act, Panama Convention, UNCITRAL Model Arbitration Law, Uniform Arbitration Act, and Revised Uniform Arbitration Act. An arbitration is accepted as a method of dispute resolution in a legal community. Having an exceptional system is held by the United States and with the large number of judicial decisions.…

    • 943 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Links for Business LAW

    • 204 Words
    • 1 Page

    Erickson, D. & Bowen, P. G. (2005/2006). Two alternatives to litigation: An introduction to arbitration and mediation. Dispute Resolution Journal, 60(4), 42-28.…

    • 204 Words
    • 1 Page
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Answer Rationale: Arbitrators, negotiators, and fact-finders may or may not be court-appointed. Negotiators and fact finders do not render judgments.…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    what is crime

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages

    herself. He or she makes the decisions and hires the lawyers. The case is entirely voluntary.…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    ADR holds an extensive, easily influenced and diverging choice of processes for finding solutions for disputes which are personified by structured negotiation and consensus. It is regarded that arbitration is a familiar ADR technique, however, it is a more of a official adjudicative and adversary technique – initially a confidential litigation process – which has more commonality to litigation than the more original consensual processes which symbolise ADR. As simplified by Angyal (Alternative Dispute Resolution, 1987, p. 11):…

    • 1955 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Usually cheaper than litigation: resolving a case through arbitration is usually far less costly than proceeding through litigation because the process is quicker and generally less complicated than a court proceeding.…

    • 1034 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    1) To prevent multiplicity of actions and to enable the court to settle disputes between all parties to them in one action;…

    • 1979 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Doctrine of Competence

    • 2160 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The proper allocation of responsibilities between courts and arbitral tribunals for resolving disputes concerning arbitral jurisdiction – disputes about whether the plaintiff’s claim ought to be decided by an arbitral tribunal or a court – has been one of the most complex and controversial question of modern arbitration law. Although there is broad agreement on one general proposition that arbitrators are empowered to rule on their own jurisdiction and then proceed to settle the substantive dispute (UNCITRAL Model Law 16(1), French Code Art 1466, English Arbitration Act 1996, S 30(1), Swiss PIL Art 186(1)) – decades of debates failed to produce a genuine consensus among commentators, courts and policy-makers.…

    • 2160 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    and the court to attain the justice. Since the court itself is active to secure…

    • 1336 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Admin Tribunal

    • 1348 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In pursuance of administrative law, there can arise disputes. These disputes require adjudication. There are administrative agencies other than courts to adjudicate such issues arising in the course of day to day administration. It is more familiar called as administrative tribunals. An administrative tribunal is a body set up by legislation to adjudicate upon disputes in a specific area and which enjoys a degree of autonomy. Such tribunals seem to constitute the best mechanism to settle disputes outside the court system because they enjoy some element of separation and independence from the administration and come very near the model of a court.…

    • 1348 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays