Preview

Are Ceos Overpaid?

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
793 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Are Ceos Overpaid?
“The answer to the question of whether American CEOs are overpaid is clearly "yes"; for those who earn large bonuses and generous stock options when their companies are doing badly, either absolutely or relative to competitors. As mentioned in an article written by Gary Beckner and Richard Posner. This research paper will discuss in details the facts that have been research as to why CEOs are being overpaid. It will discuss the pros and cons of the CEOs salary and compensation and how employees should share part of the profits accordingly.
In the business world of today, one's pay should reflect the amount of work he or she has done. This rule should apply to all individuals in the workforce including CEOs. However, it is well recognized that there have been doubts on whether some high placed CEOs are being overpaid. A Chief Executive Officer is not supposed to obtain an unusually high salary if his or her company were to file for bankruptcy. According to an online article written by Michael Winter, the Financial Times newspaper stated that CEOs themselves claim that they are being overpaid. He also states that, "The issue is particularly sensitive because the gap between rich and poor in America has reached its widest point in more than 60 years." These results came from a survey that was conducted on the major U.S. business leaders. There has to be a boundary because it is morally and financially incorrect for any corporation or company to continue to operate in such a fashion. These unfair procedures sometimes lead to economic instability or employee strikes.
Top CEOs are partly responsible for the welfare of the nation's economy. If these CEOs lead their companies to financial distress, then their shareholders will have to suffer due to the loss of money they have invested. According to F. John Reh ( a writer on About.com), In the 1980's CEOs of large companies made about 42 times what the average employee would make in an hour. He also states

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Jenn Is the Best

    • 363 Words
    • 2 Pages

    CEO’o o o s are highly educated and have years of experience in running businesses and have a unique skill set that most people do not have and therefore should be compensated for their skills…

    • 363 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ira Kay and Steven Van Putten research argues that labor markers for executives are actually competitive, and that pay levels track corporate performance (Kay,Van Putten, 2010). I agree with the notion that executive pay is based on the salaries of others in the industry in a similar position.…

    • 1074 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Because much of this gross compensation is tied to the performance of the company and the company’s stock, the CEOs’ chase after the rainbow brings benefits that spillover to many. And while CEO compensation can often seem obscene, at least there is tangible productivity, in contrast to the spoiled celebrity or government-lobbying lawyer or the regulation-skirting financier. Regardless, the essential question is what has each of us done with the talents and resources God has entrusted to us?” (Stapleford, 2009, p. 136).…

    • 1653 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cake Consulting

    • 13842 Words
    • 56 Pages

    Simmering, M. J. (2011). Executive Compensation. Retrieved October 4, 2011, from Encyclopedia of Business: http://www.referenceforbusiness.com/management/Em-Exp/Executive-Compensation.htm…

    • 13842 Words
    • 56 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chapter 11 Questions

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages

    CEO compensation is not a problem for the federal government to police, but due to the over compensation and stock options CEOs are receiving, they may need to step in. As of now, executive pay is “pay for performance”, which is covered by a base salary, bonus, and long-term incentives. Some companies have employment agreements that spell out everything that an executive will receive, regardless of performance. Some of these compensation packages that CEOs receive need to be revamped and be more based on the performance of them and the company. Also with some of the leadership and power some CEOs have, they are able to over-power the board of directors to obtain higher pay and bonuses. In situations like these, there needs to be someone, an organization or a company group that cannot be affected by the CEO’s power, that can police the CEO’s and company’s performance. The broad of directors are supposed to handle this, but there are some reasons that the board of directors fail in allowing excessive compensation to CEOS. As stated in the text, “many board of directors are passive and do not play an active or questioning role in setting executive compensation”, “executive pay is higer than would be obtained under thorough and intense arm’s length bargaining”, “the compensation portion is in many cases a less significant amount of the total payment”, and “salary and nonperformance compensation packages lack incentives that align managers and shareholder interests”. So yes the federal government could put a ceiling on CEO compensation, but for the CEOs that are truly working and producing a growing company, that ceiling could actually diminish their work ethic.…

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Current Event Paper

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages

    CEO’s are the highest paid workers of the company. This article is a complaint about how high the CEO’s salaries can get up to. The main lady in this article says, “the gap is too big between the worker and the CEO” They conduct a survey every year on the pay gap between CEO and common worker. The incentive for them to work hard is rewarded by earning shares in the company they helped build. They state that “if the pay for an average production worker had increased at the same rate as the CEO pay during the 1990s, the average worker would make $110,399 and the minimum wage would be $22.08.” This would make the world a little bit different place today. The CEO Pay Targeted article was a very good and truthful article.…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    B.C. Henderson, A. Masli, V. J. Richardson, and J.M. Sanchez take a closer look at the relationship between layoffs and the compensation of the chief executive officer (CEO). Through quantitative research they discover that as the number of layoffs increase, CEOs’ bonus compensation decreases and their equity-based compensation increases (2010). Also in their research, they find that more powerful CEOs take smaller reductions in pay in comparison to smaller CEOs, even though the market performance of their firms is not superior (2010).…

    • 1041 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ethics and Ceo Pay

    • 1395 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Chief Executive Officer pay in the United States has risen dramatically. In the past three decades the salary of a CEO has risen significantly beyond what can be explained by variables such as firm, size, performance, and industry classification (Bebchuk & Grinstein, 2005). According to research, the CEO pay at the nation’s top 500 largest companies averages about $10.9 million a year. The CEOs are also receiving an additional $364,000 in perks. It was estimated that the average CEO makes 319 times more than the average worker in 2008 compared to a multiple of 42 in 1980((Anderson, Cavanagh, Kliner, & Stanton, 2005). CEO pay becomes an ethical issue when CEOs are compensated in excess for poor performance and when jobs of regular workers are downsized drastically but CEO pay is unaffected. The purpose of this paper is to discuss leader character, moral responsibility, and CEO pay.…

    • 1395 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Pummeled by the bind of a painful recession and furious over oversized executive compensation packages at the very Wall Street firms widely blamed for the economic chaos, they gradually distrust key establishments and individual leaders. Americans are angered at the financial services region. They believe that these institutions have rigged the game so that top level executives are rewarded substantially even when they fail. Americans want action to restore fairness to the system and get pay back in line. The variety of experts and activists of political leaders and ordinary citizens, there is a belief that executive incentives have exaggerated short-term perfor¬mance, supported unnecessary risk-taking, and failed to discipline poor performance. Many believe that incentive plans have tempted some CEOs to put personal financial interests in front of good stewardship that provides the long-term interests of their organizations (Ethics Resource Center,…

    • 1089 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ethics

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The pay ratio provision requires publicly held companies to annually calculate the median total compensation for all employees globally, and disclose a ratio of the median employee’s compensation to the CEO’s compensation (H.R. Policy Association, n.d.). The SEC should mandate the disclosure of pay ratios because there are too many CEO’s collecting excessive salaries while their workers are making minimum wage. It is agreed that a general worker who has little experience as compared with a top executive with countless years of experience and education both fall into different pay brackets. However, the ratio between both salaries should not be too extreme. While a typical employee may take home their salary and hope of a 401-K, a CEO’s pay consists of their salary, a bonus, benefits, company stock, and growing pensions. This…

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Executive Pay

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In a recent editorial in the Seattle Times, the editors complained that the executives of a public company, Simon Property Group, should have their salaries determined by the shareholders. Among the many things wrong with this piece is first, how do shareholders know anything about the performance of the executives in question? They don’t. They don’t work beside them on any kind of basis. They do not know what kind of challenges the company faced and whether the executive responded superbly or poorly to some change in the business environment. An executive could have responded with perfect decision making in a company whose destiny was determined by technology. Think Kodak or Xerox. Even then the company might show poor results even though all the right decisions were made. The world changed and buyers are fickle. Think of how many restaurant chains went from being the hottest item on the stock market to bankruptcy. Customers are faddish, they go for something for a while and then change allegiances when another fad comes along. Sure, it would be nice to think that some magical CEO could have done something about the changes, but most likely, even God could not have prevented the disaster.…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    First and foremost, let us take a look at the blessed few that constitute the .01%, .1% or even the 1% in American society. The majority of these individuals are the top corporate officials of multi-national, multi-billion dollar companies, such as General Motors, General Electric, MasterCard, Bank of America, American Express, and International Business Machines to name a few. During the last several decades, executive compensation has reached scandalous levels at certain corporations. Originally, during the 1950s and 1960s, the pay of top executives remained steady with an increase of less than 1% annually, according to economists at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. However, over the next three decades, the earnings of the top 1% increased threefold (Inequality). According to a study done by the Congressional Budget Office, “after adjusting for inflation, the after-tax income of the top 1% jumped 139% from 1979 to 2001, whereas the income of the middle fifth rose by just 17%, to $43,700, and the income of the poorest fifth rose…

    • 508 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “It is precisely this fiction-that the singular and primary purpose of the firm is to create value (in the form of a rising stock price) for its shareholders, who are problematically conceptualized as “the owners” - that has allowed corporate America to be shorn from? its job-creating potential and commitment to employment and other stakeholders and to be mined as a collection of financial assets for elite and private gain” (Ho 2). This argument by Ho brings up many points. Over the last few decades, companies have come under more pressure to deliver quarterly results that are pleasing to investors. In placating investors, however, employees can get hurt. When inflation rises or a company must cut costs, companies typically fire employees. CEOs are incentivized to appease Wall Street because they benefit from a rise in their company’s stocks, and their fiduciary duty pushes them to generate returns. They aren’t rewarded for retaining employees even if it is morally right, and management is far more concerned about the company’s performance than the economy’s performance. Also, poor people often do not own stocks. Even with the rallying of the market with Trump’s win in the polls, Trump’s base likely did not benefit much. Wealthy people are more likely to own stocks than poor people. Trump’s wealthy supporters enjoyed lower taxes and higher stock prices.…

    • 1655 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Wealth Inequality

    • 1395 Words
    • 6 Pages

    population. It also states that the richest 100 households in the U.S. have more combined wealth than the entire African-American population in the United States. Donald Trump, republican candidate for the American presidency has a net worth of well over five billion dollars. According to glassdoor.com n.d. the CEO of Starbucks makes close to 22,000,000 a year in salary while a worker in one of his stores averages $22,000 a year. The CEO of Walt Disney Company's earns close to $47,000,000 annually while the average worker in his company makes $80,000 a year. These are just two examples of the numerous companies in the United States which have similar disparity in company pay. This gap in pay has a negative impact on American…

    • 1395 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Baumol

    • 1345 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The majority of empirical evidence shows that there little correlation between the remuneration of top managers and the profit performance of their companys, instead sale revenue is seen as the major contributor to the salaries of managers. McGuire et al. (1962) tried to test Baumols contention that managers salaries are much more closely related to scale of operations of the firm than with profitability. They devised…

    • 1345 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays