Are East Asian Countries Better Than Others?

A number of people assert that some cultures are not more efficient than others because East Asia’s inability to dominate the world was because of their geographical location in the world and their surroundings but I think that some cultures are better than others because East Asian countries continue to grow from the adoption of Western cultures. They would explain that East Asian countries did not have the ability to conquer the world do to the formation of the their land. The coastline of China is much “smoother” as well as having the north and south “bound together from east to west by two long navigable river systems” which maintained “chronic unity” throughout China (Diamond 414). Consequently, due to their unification “one decision stopped
After World War II, Japan began to work off the Capitalist Industrial model making them the leaders in “steel production and shipbuilding”(Bulliet et al. 858). After the death of Mao, China had decades of economic growth when they “modernized” their economy increasing their GDP “eighty-one times” (Bulliet et al. 875). Both China and Japan capitalized on Western or Capitalist developments; entering them into the world economy and dominating it alongside Western countries. Furthermore, Japan is often listed as a Western country as they accepted parts of American culture. China has grown exponentially after they adopted a number of capitalist methods by allowing foreign investments. These East Asian countries espoused themselves with Western cultures for their ideas and beliefs; improving them and launching themselves into being part of the richest countries in the world. Saying that their cultures are just as good as Western ones makes little sense as their developments have been built off of European culture to enhance their