Preview

Are India's Nuclear Power Plants Safe and Secure

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
314 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Are India's Nuclear Power Plants Safe and Secure
Are India's nuclear power plants safe and secure?
The recent earthquake in Japan, which has caused a major nuclear crisis has forced people across the world to ask questions about the viability of nuclear power. Indians too are asking whether nuclear power is a safe option for the country.
FEARS OF nuclear meltdown in Japan have put question marks on safety and security of `nuclear plants across the world. Analysts have predicted that the ongoing crisis in Japan will lead to soul searching about the future of nuclear power. This will also impact India’s ambitious nuclear power program. India is presently having twenty nuclear power plants with a generating capacity of 4,780 megawatt (MW), but all the plants are located in low seismic areas, and all plants are situated far away from the tectonically-active Himalayan zone. Nuclear plants in various earthquake prone regions of the world are categorized between Zone I to Zone IX. In India, all power plants are sited in Zone II, III and IV. The Zones II, III and IV come under lower seismic prone area while Zones VII, VIII and IX are highly seismic prone areas. India’s Narora Nuclear reactor is the only plant that is situated in Zone IV. All Japan's nuclear plants are in Zones VII,VIII and IX, while Taiwan's are in Zones VIII and IX. During the earthquake that rocked Bhuj in Gujarat in 2001, all nculear reactors withstood the shocks and aftershocks without any problem. Analysts said that in India all plants are quite safe and have been designed to withstand earthquakes. They also aver that Indian plants are relatively safe as compared to Japan as they are located in low seismic zones. It must also be pointed that Japan is is vulnerable to high intensity earthquakes and as such all nuclear installations can face similar

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Japanese population is very mad and worried over all the Nuclear Power Plants. Nowadays, 1 year after the Nuclear disaster in Fukushima, Japan closed down 52 of all 54 Nuclear Power Plants, 2 are still open.…

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first disparity between the Chernobyl and Fukushima accident is the causes. The Chernobyl accident was caused by human error in conducting the plant outside its technical specifications and failure to notify the proper authorities following the accident. Chernobyl’s power plant also had a faulty nuclear reactor design which exclude a containment structure typically found in most nuclear power plant. The two contributing factors usher the nuclear reactor to explode and failure to contain discharge of radioactive materials into the atmosphere. In contrast, the Fukushima accident precipitate due to natural disaster consist of earthquake and tsunami causing a malfunction of the plant’s cooling system. Unlike Chernobyl, Fukushima’s nuclear plant…

    • 143 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Most earthquakes coincide with major plate margins, some of which have a greater density of quakes, for example along the west coast of South America and in the Japan/Philippine region, than others like the Pacific Rise or the Mid Atlantic Ridge. Also, earthquakes at destructive margins have a greater spread and therefore more locations are at risk than at constructive plate boundaries. Looking at the top twenty most devastating earthquakes from 1990, they all occurred at either destructive or transform margins. Therefore, irrespective of their level of development, some countries are automatically more vulnerable to an earthquake hazard, just by their geographical location.…

    • 1778 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many people around the world ask themselves what are the disadvantages of adopting an alternative solution to solve the consumption of global nuclear energy? Based on what we have experienced through events with major disasters and the aftermath of many casualties, it has summed up to result in having failures outgrowing expectations. Therefore, global nuclear power usage is to be opposed due to the fact that it comes with high financial costs, nuclear waste management complications, and the fact that thousands in populations are mass numbers of casualties.…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    labouring the Walmart way

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Today nuclear power as an efficient and low consumption energy has been used widely, however, nuclear energy has potential and serious problems which people can not control.…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Certainly, building codes implemented in Japan were effective, consequently there were many other mitigation opportunities missed. While there had not been a recent earthquake in this location, past history had shown that this area was susceptible to strong earth movements as recently as the…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Earthquake Shaker

    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The amount of damage caused by an Earthquake does not solely depend on the magnitude of the Earthquake. Factors such as population, geographic location, soil type, and the type of building material commonly used for construction in a region determine the extent of damage caused. If an Earthquake strikes a densely populated region, then life loss and property damage will be high. If an Earthquake of a similar or even higher magnitude strikes a region with a relatively low population, then life loss and property damage will be lower. The 6.4 Richter scale Earthquake (1993) in the State of Maharashtra, India and the 8.3 Richter scale Earthquake (2006) in Kuril Islands, Japan are examples that come to mind. With stone houses and a population of over 2 million, the Earthquake in Latur left nearly 8,000 people dead and brought as many as 30,000 houses to the ground. In contrast, Kuril Islands, with a population of just 17,000 and better disaster preparedness mechanisms, was able to get away with no loss of human life ,despite the fact that the Earthquake was much higher in magnitude when compared to that of Latur.…

    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kobe Earthquake

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages

    With reference to the Kobe earthquake (1995) and Sichuan earthquake (2008), decide whether this statement is true or not.…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Fukushima I Nuclear Power Plant also known as Fukushima Dai-ichi (dai-ichi means "number one"), is a disabled nuclear power plant located on a 3.5-square-kilometre (860-acre) site[1] in the towns of Okuma and Futaba in the Futaba District of Fukushima Prefecture, Japan. First commissioned in 1971, the plant consists of six boiling water reactors (BWR). These light water reactors drove electrical generators with a combined power of 4.7 GWe, making Fukushima Daiichi one of the 15 largest nuclear power stations in the world. Fukushima I was the first nuclear plant to be designed, constructed and run in conjunction with General Electric, Boise, and Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO).[3]…

    • 5782 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Fukushima Disaster

    • 1638 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant was built in Okuma, Fukushima, to provide Japan with electricity. The plant consists of six nuclear reactors that were built during different times in the 1970s. The reactors were built close together primarily because finding a new location would make a new reactor very expensive, compared to the addition of a new reactor. The plant was constructed near the sea because nuclear plants consumes massive amount of waters just for its cooling needs and also for steam generation which then drives turbines that generate electricity. The various reactors serviced different companies and suppliers including General Electric, Toshiba, and Hitachi.…

    • 1638 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fukushima Earthquake

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages

    An earthquake of a magnitude of 9.0 that occurred in Japan at 2:46 pm on Friday March 11, 2011 did a significant amount of damage in the region, as the following tsunami did even much more damage, flooding about 560 square kilometers resulting in a human death toll of about 19,000 and the destruction of coastal ports, towns and buildings (Fukushima Accident, 2016). Eleven reactors at four different nuclear power plants in the region were operating at the time and were all shut down when the earthquake struck, but one of the plants, the Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant showed signs of a problem on day five (Fukushima Accident, 2016). The reactors proved to overcome adverse conditions caused by the earthquake, but vulnerable to the tsunami. Unfortunately, three Tepco employees were killed directly by the earthquake and the tsunami (Fukushima Accident, 2016).…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Every powerful source of energy discovered by man, comes at a price. Nuclear energy comes with its share of risks and hazards.…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the world, countries are leaning towards nuclear energy due to the amount of energy it can produce with very little resources. This topic is worth investigating since energy is basically a must, now in the 21st century. It is now considered an essential to have energy in our lives to maintain our standards of living. We have gone to many different sources of energy other than nuclear energy such as coal, solar, wind, oil and more, but many of those energy source have flaws too. Some sources of energy will reach the peak of their production due to resources and will eventually fall, others pollute the environment just like nuclear energy and some just don’t produce enough energy for us to fully rely on them. Many countries needed a new source of energy since…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Secondly, nuclear power is dangerous. Catastrophic accidents happen all the time due to disfunctions. Several recorded accidents include the Chernobyl, Fukushima Daiichi, Three Mile Island, and the Soviet Submarine K-19 disasters. The nuclear industry says that the risk of a serious accident at a nuclear reactor is small, on the order of one in a million years, yet an observed average frequency (five reactors suffering meltdowns in the last 50 years) is one in a decade.…

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    as it was hoped to lower the price of electricity, and utilise nuclear power for…

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays