Are You A Biased Tv Biaser Analysis
Viewers decide what to watch based on personal opinions, it is also the matter of fact if these points of views are validated because people are biased. In the video Are You A Biased TV Viewer, Bernie Goldberg emphasizes that more and more tv viewers are only listening to new sources that consider and validate some of these specific points the spectators stand for. Viewers will choose sides on either liberal or conservative, but only a few will be in between actually listening to a couple of sources to choose an unprejudiced viewpoint. Someone will not agree to watch something that contradicts opinions that some consider to be honest and precise. People will not watch something that will disagree and second guess opinions being stood for. These
…show more content…
viewers coming out of work or ending a long day do not have the time or energy to sit around and listen to media bash on what at the end of the day the viewers would want to hear. Along with those viewers are a general amount of people that do not like to be incorrect and solemnly disregard any contradictions that are being confronted. Even though sometimes multiple sides could be presented viewers only decide to pay attention to information that confirms what they believe is the truth while ignoring information that challenges viewer’s assumptions.
Viewers have the mentality to switch back and forth based on the complete or incomplete amount of information given by the different types of media.
Lately, however with the way widespread media has changed the way of receiving information it is difficult to know whether one is simply roaming the internet or actually using it for causes like choosing political candidates. Although this generation, for example, is a bit more open, because for viewers actually getting information are receiving it from multiple sources and take time out to listen to different angles and points of views to the story that contribute to opinions that are not what people say preconceived opinions or ideas. Preconceived notions like ideas and opinions are created beforehand without adequate evidence. These notions are brought for people who are biased, turn sides real quick or even bandwagon. Viewers are brought in with propaganda techniques so they can try to decide quickly upon a side without fully being capable of knowing for sure what the side specifically stand for. As previously mentioned a viewer gets comfortable with frequently watched tv programs and begin to become stubborn with opinions and fail to see actual facts. Why should tv stop people from choosing a direct side, that is where generation z steps in to solve this problem for themselves, surrounded by media, this generation uses some of the ability of holding sources in technology to contradict what it is that tv sources are so afraid of sharing with spectators. That is why more and more teens are choosing sides in between what sources have for viewers to
pick.
It is important for new sources to just give facts so that anyone that wants to know all sides can and will know all sides and make it easier for the viewer to choose sides. Even though there is a substantial amount of tv viewers that are one-sided there is some that actually like to pay attention to what is happening around the world and learn more about it. If a watcher is not getting all the required information to fully understand a topic how will it ever be understood if these tv authorities are leaving out messages that the audience should be receiving. For example, the last time there was a terrorist attack it was hard to receive truthful information belonging to the horrific event and difficult for the viewers to process and fully understand what exactly happened. Do sources leave viewers hanging so more spectators join and want to know more? Either or people need the truth even if it is ignored there has to be a side or a number of viewers that care for the truth. New source have a great amount of impact of choosing sides and stories to viewers because only a substantial amount of information is given to viewers. At the end of it all people that want all sides should be able to get all sides to actually find the truth in journalism and come to a resolution.
viewers coming out of work or ending a long day do not have the time or energy to sit around and listen to media bash on what at the end of the day the viewers would want to hear. Along with those viewers are a general amount of people that do not like to be incorrect and solemnly disregard any contradictions that are being confronted. Even though sometimes multiple sides could be presented viewers only decide to pay attention to information that confirms what they believe is the truth while ignoring information that challenges viewer’s assumptions.
Viewers have the mentality to switch back and forth based on the complete or incomplete amount of information given by the different types of media.
Lately, however with the way widespread media has changed the way of receiving information it is difficult to know whether one is simply roaming the internet or actually using it for causes like choosing political candidates. Although this generation, for example, is a bit more open, because for viewers actually getting information are receiving it from multiple sources and take time out to listen to different angles and points of views to the story that contribute to opinions that are not what people say preconceived opinions or ideas. Preconceived notions like ideas and opinions are created beforehand without adequate evidence. These notions are brought for people who are biased, turn sides real quick or even bandwagon. Viewers are brought in with propaganda techniques so they can try to decide quickly upon a side without fully being capable of knowing for sure what the side specifically stand for. As previously mentioned a viewer gets comfortable with frequently watched tv programs and begin to become stubborn with opinions and fail to see actual facts. Why should tv stop people from choosing a direct side, that is where generation z steps in to solve this problem for themselves, surrounded by media, this generation uses some of the ability of holding sources in technology to contradict what it is that tv sources are so afraid of sharing with spectators. That is why more and more teens are choosing sides in between what sources have for viewers to
pick.
It is important for new sources to just give facts so that anyone that wants to know all sides can and will know all sides and make it easier for the viewer to choose sides. Even though there is a substantial amount of tv viewers that are one-sided there is some that actually like to pay attention to what is happening around the world and learn more about it. If a watcher is not getting all the required information to fully understand a topic how will it ever be understood if these tv authorities are leaving out messages that the audience should be receiving. For example, the last time there was a terrorist attack it was hard to receive truthful information belonging to the horrific event and difficult for the viewers to process and fully understand what exactly happened. Do sources leave viewers hanging so more spectators join and want to know more? Either or people need the truth even if it is ignored there has to be a side or a number of viewers that care for the truth. New source have a great amount of impact of choosing sides and stories to viewers because only a substantial amount of information is given to viewers. At the end of it all people that want all sides should be able to get all sides to actually find the truth in journalism and come to a resolution.