Argumentative Essay Of Banning Books

I strongly believe in the fact that people shouldn’t be able to challenge or ban books. First, it doesn’t follow the first amendment, free speech and beliefs. The public has different beliefs, opinions, and what they believe is right and wrong, just because a couple people don’t believe in what the book is stating, they don’t need to extract the book from other people who believe in the book. If another person has the urge to declare their point of view about what they believe no matter of the religion, race, and opinions you have, put aside some time for yourself to respect their intentions before you automatically mortify them for not being suitable to your pleasure. Another reason is that people have their own mind and time to ponder for awhile about what book that they
Say if you were Jewish and you read a book that wasn’t in your religion, you don’t need to try to challenge it since it doesn't follow your religion, instead try to appoint a contrasting book that makes you feel untroubled and more welcome. If you genuinely have the mindset that a book is truly unpleasant, just don’t let you or your kids read it because someone out there likes that book. When you and your family set restrictions on the types of books you read, there would be no one upset about reading a book they don’t believe in, or someone complaining about a book they loved is off the market, remember it’s your choice to read a book that may offend you. Everyone has their own minds and opinions, so let other people choose, not just you. If everybody will do this, the book world would have an excessive quality and be a more pleasant place. In conclusion book shouldn’t be challenged or banned because it’s unconstitutional and people have a right to