Mass incarceration has become a major problem and now it is effecting the pockets of the taxes payers. The average united States resident is paying about $260 per year on corrections, that number has almost triple up from about $77 per person in 1980. This is all thanks to “the country's annual $80 billion price tag for incarceration.”(The high price 2014) This jump in numbers in spending poses a number of questions about the country's system of incarceration, especially given that the overall rate for violent and property crimes which actually has little or no decline at all. “Today, the federal government sends $3.8 billion to states and localities each year for criminal justice. These dollars are largely focused on increasing the size of our justice system. But times have changed. We now know that mass incarceration is not necessary to keep us safe. We now know that we can reduce both crime and incarceration. States like Texas, New York, Mississippi, and California have changed their laws to do just that. For the first time in 40 years, both crime and incarceration have fallen together, since 2008.”(The Reverse Mass) With The Reverse Mass Incarceration Act the funding would be appropriate basically, because as I stated above this act would use federal dollars to reward states for reducing crime and incarceration. Over the next decade, this could …show more content…
With 2.3 million Americans behind bars, the criminal justice system is larger than ever. However, the idea I believe would work the best is the Reverse Mass Incarceration Act. There are over a million Americans behind bars, and the criminal justice system is larger than ever and continues to grow. And although a few states have been taking action into working to fix this problem there’s still a lot that needs to be done. As I stated above, many leaders across the political spectrum are arguing that The United States must find a way to end mass incarceration. Therefore, we as Americans how start holding the federal government accountable for what they do and do not do, because this is not something that can go unnoticed. There is no reason why some states should be much further ahead than the feds on this issue. I think to reduce mass incarceration it’s going to take a great plan and that great plan is The Reverse Mass Incarceration Act. The federal government can apply this act the way it apply the “Crime Bill. It can be termed a “Reverse Crime Bill,” or the “Reverse Mass Incarceration Act.” As I stated above it would provide funds to states to reduce imprisonment and crime together. This act would use federal dollars to reward states for reducing crime and incarceration. Over the next decade, this could result in a 20 percent reduction in imprisonment nationwide. I feel that if the federal government