Preview

Arguments Against Ethical Relativism

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
645 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Arguments Against Ethical Relativism
Saying that ethics are relative is an effortless way to avoid a controversial topic concerning ethics. In the case of relativism, we can simply say that your opinion is true and mine too and nothing being wrong with that. On the other hand, ethical absolutism tells us that there is an objective moral code and that certain of our actions as humans are necessarily right or wrong. What would happen if we say two contradictory statements can't coexist as Aristotle demonstrated? Through the law of non-contradiction from Aristotle and ethical absolutism, I will argue against ethical relativism.

In ethical absolutism, there is only one answer on certain human actions, following an objective moral code. According to absolutists, this code has been the same ever since humans have existed. Logically, this code applies to everyone the same, even to a civilization that has existed centuries ago or to any rational being in the universe. In our case of the dinner party, if I believe that abortion is wrong, and the other person believes that abortion is right, then automatically there is at least one person who is right and the other who is wrong.
…show more content…
Whatever we may consider progress to be, usually considered an upgrade, ethical relativism blocks out the reason for considering progress. To take a clearer example than the debate about abortion, if I was to say that a brick house is as good as a straw house, yet we only dispose of straw because it is readily available, there is no reason given in my statement to push you to build a brick house. Back to our example, many people consider the legalization of abortion to be social progress. Others say otherwise. Yet, if a society has a set rule about abortion, and the society is adhering to ethical relativism, then they have no reason ever to change their legalization regarding abortion because it is both a right and wrong thing at the same

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Many people are lead to adopt Ethical Relativism because they believe that it justifies their view that one ought to be tolerant of the different behavior of people in other cultures. However, Ethical Relativism does not really justify tolerance at all. All around the world, there are different types of cultures, which have different ethical values that will be correct according to their cultures. Nevertheless, some people might argue about different cultures that have different moral codes that they can not accept; examples: polygamy and infanticide. On the other hand, Ethical Relativism proposes that we can stop the criticism and be more tolerant with other cultures. To illustrate, we could no longer say that custom of other societies…

    • 123 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Moral relativism is one’s perception of what is acknowledged to be morally just or unjust depending on accepted demeanor. Certain behaviors and manners that a specific culture may consider to be acceptable, another culture may consider to be unethical. In such an instance, neither one of the cultures would be incorrect. Morals are culturally defined in that it originates from the root as to what is considered socially acceptable.…

    • 1232 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Annotated Bibliography

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Moral Relativism is what determines whether the action or conduct is right or wrong. This article states how from a moral absolutist standpoint, some things are always right, while some things are always wrong no matter how much one tries to rationalize them. At the same time, this article defines moral relativism as the belief that conflicting moral beliefs are true. What this means is that what you think is morally right, may not be morally right for someone else. Basically relativism replaces the search for absolute truth. Moral relativism and moral absolutism are means of deriving the morality of the character from The Road. They are tools to use to judge the characters actions, if they can be considered morally correct or morally unethical.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ethical relativism is a concept in which most simple minded individuals adhere to. According to definition in the chapter, ethical relativism is the normative theory that what is right is what the culture or individual says is right. Shaw argues that it is not very plausible to say that ethical relativism is determined by what a person thinks is right and wrong. He gives reason that it “collapses the distinction between thinking something is right and it’s actually being right.” Ethical relativism may be justified occasionally. William H. Shaw examines ethical relativism by providing comprehensive examples on why relativism is a weak method in gaining morals.…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    My understanding of what Dobson had to say about moral relativism is in agreement with my source, All About God Ministries, Inc. It is stated in their article “All About Philosophy” “Moral relativism is the view that moral truths depend on the individual or group who hold them. There are no moral absolutes. Moral relativism cheapens human life. When morality is reduced to personal tastes, people exchange the question, “What is good?” for the pleasure question, “What feels good?” Rather than basing decisions on what is right, decisions are based on self-interest” ("Moral Relativism”, 2017, para. 5-6)…

    • 371 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Moral relativism did not become a prominent topic in philosophy or elsewhere until the 20th century. Moral relativism is the making of an excuse for the action done. Behaviors should not be dismissed under certain circumstances. Moral relativism is dangerous and illogical which can be seen through murders, abortion, and lying.…

    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pojman Ethical Relativism

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Ethical Relativism is the belief that nothing is objectively right or wrong and that the meaning of what is right and wrong depends on the individual and culture. Pojman breaks down Ethical Relativism into 2 main concepts: The Diversity Theory and the Dependency Theory. The Diversity Theory addresses the concept of what is morally right and wrong varies from society to society; therefore, there is no universal moral principles that all societies accept. For example, Homosexuality in the Middle East is a forbidden practice, while in ancient Greek culture, it was said to be a accepted practice. The Dependency Theory says that all moral principles receive their validity from cultural acceptance.…

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ethical Subjectivism, also known as individual relativism, is the metaethical view that there are no objective truths in ethic; moral claims are true or false based upon individuals’ feelings. So, any moral claim may be translated as a reporting of one’s feelings. The best example here in this type is “Stealing things from good friends is wrong” can be rewrite as “I disapprove of stealing things from good friends.” In this case, moral right or wrong is based on the individual’s opinion. In the other word, if two people have different opinions about a same moral questions. Then they might have two opposite ideas. For instance, Bob believes that lying is wrong because when people lied to him, they expect to treat him like a thing not a person. However, John thinks that lying is right due to some cases that people can save innocent lives by lying to a bunch of dangerous guys. I can say that both of them are right because they have their own evidence to approve their ideas. There is no certain evidence that moral rules exist. So, moral truth exists, but is not based on universal standards. Nobody can say that lying is absolutely right or wrong because people can have many so many evidences to approve either side right or wrong. As a result, personal feelings must provide the certain rules of moral truth. Like the example before, Bob’s moral truth is built on the respects and trusts between his friends and him; on the other hand, John’s bases on saving innocent lives is the most important thing in the world regardless of any moral rules in this world.…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Moral Minima

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The article was very clear and left no room for grey areas but as history would show, and as it’s stated in the first chapter, “the view of ethical relativism regards values as determined by one’s own ethical standard, often those provided by one’s own culture and background. Rather than insisting that there are moral absolutes, moral claims must be interpreted in terms of how they reflect a person’s viewpoint; moral claims are then said to be “right in a given culture” or “wrong for a given society”. (Mosser, 2010)…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Absolutism and relativism are two extreme ethical approaches to reality. While they are both valid and supported by facts, they are very contrasting in their views. Values are what a person cares about and thinks is worthwhile. For example, values can include life, love, religious faith, freedom, relationships,health, justice, education, family and many other things. Usually these values are what provides the passion in a person's life, and gives them hope and a reason for being. A person might go to any lengths to protect what they feel is right and to preserve these values. Values can be divided up into two subcategories absolute and relative. Absolute values deal with conventional ethics. In absolutism, everything is certain. Relativism, on the other hand, is more subjective.…

    • 1320 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Absolutist theory is that certain actions are right or wrong from an objective point of view; it doesn’t change according to culture. People are considered to have rational and self-determination – it means they are capable of making choices and acting upon them. So, someone who looks at something from a absolutist point of view doesn’t look at the result or the consequence of an action but the action itself, (they disregard the context of the act) actions are fundamentally right or wrong which means they are right or wrong in themselves. This approach to ethics is known as ‘deontological’. This has often been based on two different ethical theories Kantianism; the view that the only intrinsically good thing is a good will and utilitarianism; that the morally best action is the one that makes the most overall happiness.…

    • 848 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Relativism Vs Absolutism

    • 1376 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Absolutism means that no matter the circumstances that arise, each person is treated the same. This is widely a problem in the legal and justice systems when various crimes are committed but are each committed for their own reason. Let’s say that, for this example these are fake names, that Joe killed someone and Emma killed someone. Joe killed someone because he was drunk and ended up driving himself home even though it is illegal to operate a vehicle while under the influence of alcohol. Emma killed someone in self defense while trying to get away from her abusive boyfriend, even though she did not intend to kill him but simply meant to just hurt him enough so she could get away from him and save her own life. Due to absolutism each of these cases would be treated as equally even though Joe both drove while intoxicated and was convicted of manslaughter and Emma was trying to save her own life, with no intention of actually killing her boyfriend. Joe may not have had pure intention of harming anyone either but that is excused because of his judgement being impaired in the first place due to him being intoxicated. Now this could go on and on to make it supported under absolutism but again, this is a less belief because of the difficulty to make these believed as both equal. Another simple reason this belief is less believed in is because absolutism makes life seem ‘black and white,’ which is not true at all because life is way more than ‘black and white’ but is instead ‘colorful’ in every…

    • 1376 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Relativism and Absolution

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In order to promote harmony Morality dictates our actions, beliefs and behaviours it separates what we commonly call the ‘good’ and the ‘bad’. But we should not have it confused it with the law’s of what's ‘right’ and ‘wrong’ because they are not one and the same thing.To quote the “Random House Websters College Dictionary”: Absolutism is any theroy holding that values, principels, ect., are absolute and not relative, dependant, or changeable. In The Meanings of Absolute on page (78) It went into detail about so called laws of a scientific nature are still only probable rather than being the absolute truth.…

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are people in this world that believe that ethics are relative, but there are other people who believe that ethics are absolute too. For a person who believes ethics are truly relative, they evaluate acts as right or wrong based on their culture or the person. Ethical or moral relativism is the position in meta-ethics that morality is not universal, but that moral truths can be determined by factors relative to social, cultural, historical or personal circumstances. In the other hand, people who believe ethics are absolute, they support a set of rules that applies to everyone in general. Moral absolutism holds that moral and immoral acts are always so regardless of context.…

    • 1176 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ethical relativism says that whatever the majority deems to be the moral rule, is the proper rule to follow. Meaning whatever majority of your culture says is right is right. If you culture believes that abortion is something that you do on a regular basis if you don't want children and you also don't want to do anything to prevent getting pregnant. Than that is what you do because it is the moral thing to do.…

    • 426 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays