Preview

Relativism and Absolution

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
577 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Relativism and Absolution
Relativism and Absolution

In order to promote harmony Morality dictates our actions, beliefs and behaviours it separates what we commonly call the ‘good’ and the ‘bad’. But we should not have it confused it with the law’s of what's ‘right’ and ‘wrong’ because they are not one and the same thing.To quote the “Random House Websters College Dictionary”: Absolutism is any theroy holding that values, principels, ect., are absolute and not relative, dependant, or changeable. In The Meanings of Absolute on page (78) It went into detail about so called laws of a scientific nature are still only probable rather than being the absolute truth.

The meaning and application on absolute versus relativism refers to “perfect in quality;complete; but not limited by restrictions or exceptions; they should not be doubted or questioned.Relativism in its extreme form makes no sense. While i do agree with the book about how it is important to allow for cultural individualism I should only be relevant to the time in which the culture is relevant and practical.The extreme variations in manners and taboos from culture to coultre are always changing because of the cultural environments. Absolutism can fall into a category that makes them too general to be of any ones use specifically when one looks at the bible verses on the ten commandments. Thou shalt not steal. We all know that stealing can lead to imprisonment but there are times when it is morally acceptable to steal.When one needs food for a family or maybe if the item was stolen from you would it be right for you to steal it back. Do two right make a wrong in this instance or are you in the wrong.

Let me begin with the fact that you talked on how americans view abortion. you stated once in the class about how the asian women drowned her baby in the rice field because of the fact that they are to only have one child per family so not to further reduce the food surplus in the nation. In america it is called abortion

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    DBQ 10 21 14

    • 729 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Another important aspect of absolutism is religion and keeping the religious happy. The religious followers never like too much change and being an absolutist means you have full control over the church. In Document F, Bishop Jacques Bossuet is speaking about a king’s relation to the church; he states, “There is something religious in the…

    • 729 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Absolutism is the acceptance of, or belief in absolute principles in political, philosophical, ethical, or theological matters. French absolutism started with Louis XIV and Russian absolutism started with Peter the Great. Louis XIV ruled from 1643-1714 and Peter the Great ruled from 1699-1725. In French absolutism, the rule of absolute monarchs was not all embracing because they lacked the financial and military resources, and the technology to make it so. France and Russia are alike in absolutism that they both sought to control religion and that they got the rich out of paying taxes. They are different in that Louis XIV wasn’t successful in wars, but Peter the Great was.…

    • 942 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Many people are lead to adopt Ethical Relativism because they believe that it justifies their view that one ought to be tolerant of the different behavior of people in other cultures. However, Ethical Relativism does not really justify tolerance at all. All around the world, there are different types of cultures, which have different ethical values that will be correct according to their cultures. Nevertheless, some people might argue about different cultures that have different moral codes that they can not accept; examples: polygamy and infanticide. On the other hand, Ethical Relativism proposes that we can stop the criticism and be more tolerant with other cultures. To illustrate, we could no longer say that custom of other societies…

    • 123 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Annotated Bibliography

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Moral Relativism is what determines whether the action or conduct is right or wrong. This article states how from a moral absolutist standpoint, some things are always right, while some things are always wrong no matter how much one tries to rationalize them. At the same time, this article defines moral relativism as the belief that conflicting moral beliefs are true. What this means is that what you think is morally right, may not be morally right for someone else. Basically relativism replaces the search for absolute truth. Moral relativism and moral absolutism are means of deriving the morality of the character from The Road. They are tools to use to judge the characters actions, if they can be considered morally correct or morally unethical.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shaw gives an obvious and unconvincing example. He compares abortion in two different societies; it is absolutely wrong in Catholic Spain, but widely accepted in Japan. Most readers would agree that this occurs and abortion is a topic that the world will most likely never come to agreeing terms with. Therefore, relativism is actually significant in each culture. Cultural relativism is complicated in that a whole group of people within an area believe in what they've always been told. Shaw gives an excellent example about slavery in the south. Decades ago, it unfortunately existed and it was acceptable in that time period. However, now it is clearly immoral. A relativist would think that it is acceptable because it was part of the culture. It is not steady to keep changing morals through time. So, who distinguishes right from wrong in that whole society in the first place?…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Moral Relativism is the thought that the moral beliefs held by individuals is influenced and dependent on the culture in which they live in considers tolerable. Hence, what is considered morally appropriate in a single society perhaps is perceived as immoral in a different society. In actuality they both maybe right as they have distinct creators resulting in different laws, diversity, and possibly religious views of each other. Ruth Benedict defends the theory of moral relativism in her article A Defense of Moral Relativism from The Journal of General Psychology. In contrast, William B. Irvine author of Confronting Relativism feels in a few swift examples people can be talked out of their views on moral…

    • 116 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Absolutism is the view of thinking that there is a single standard in terms of assessments that can be made, and that standard is usually their own. In a clash of cultures, they often see the other culture as simply wrong insofar as it deviates from their own. Relativism sees each culture as correct in its own world and they deny any exhaustive standard in terms of which conflicting cultures can be judged. Philosophical flaws involved with two notions in relation to the concept of tolerance can be illustrated by the example of female genital mutilation practiced in Saudi Arabia. One must be a relativist in order to have a high tolerance for this. In other words, a relativist would say that each culture is right unto itself so forced clitoridectomies can be morally permissible in those countries but what if a Saudi Arabian family living in America is practicing such thing in a clandestine way? Is it right to accept such an act as a relativist? If accepting the absolutist idea (in this case Saudi Arabian genital mutilation would be the absolutist idea) is considered tolerant, is it morally right to be tolerant? Absolutists would maintain that such practices are illegal in America and they should be banned everywhere. That makes them intolerant in theory but it is certain that a majority of people from non-Arabic countries would be against the practice of clitoridectomies, and this makes us intolerant. Should we be labeled intolerant when it comes to being against this kind of practice? Should relativism be deemed better than absolutism? It is hard to say so.…

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Relativism is the idea that one's beliefs and values are understood in terms of one's society, culture, or even one's own individual values. You may disagree with someone and believe your view is superior, relative to you as an individual; more often, relativism is described in terms of the values of the community in which one lives. The view of ethical relativism regards values as determined by one's own ethical standards, often those provided by one's own culture and background. Rather than insisting that there are moral absolutes, moral claims must be interpreted in terms of how they reflect a person's viewpoint; moral claims are then said to be "right in a given culture" or "wrong for a given society." Perhaps one person lives in a culture where having a sexual relationship outside of marriage is regarded as one of the worst things a person can do; in this culture a person engaging in extramarital sex may be punished or even forced to leave. But another culture might have a considerably different…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Relativism does not completely follow after moral rules, the rules are altered in a way which is flexible in contrast to an absolutist’s rules. For example the Decalogue states: ‘You shall not murder’ In terms of the euthanasia, this goes against an absolutist’s moral rules however, when it comes to a relativist’s perceptive they are able to adapt to certain situations. The situation is significantly different when it comes to murdering for the sake of committing crime and relieving a loved one from pain and suffering by intentional death. The morality of these situations are significantly different as well as the intentions behind…

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Absolutism has been present in Europe since the 14th century. Absolutism is led by a King who believes in divine right. A divine right leader believes that God sent him to be King. An absolute monarch believes that people should just follow them, since they were sent by God. If someone were to disobey the King, they would actually be disobeying God, not the King. The only person that can make decisions in an absolute monarch is the King because if anyone else makes the decision it is not coming from God. The people in an absolute monarch are supposed to follow the king, work, and pay taxes. Absolutism was harmful for Europe socially because of religion conflicts, politically since the citizens do not have any rights, and economically…

    • 135 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Absolutism is a simple manner was the absolute power held by the monarch, and was exempt from being challenged. In other words, a monarch could, in theory, regulate various aspects of life without their authority being called into question. In France, absolutism is associated with the likes of Louis XIII, but rather more so with his descendent, King Louis XIV. However, while in theory absolutism granted the king a vast majority if the power and authority, it does not mean that it worked that way in practice. The king still had to answer to God.…

    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Instead absolutism neglects different circumstances along with cultural attitudes, cannot have a clear idea of its morals as no one can state them or knows them, also it is not concerned with the motive or outcome of any actions. However, it does provide a universal vision to measure everything against, creating fairness as everyone would get the same punishment or reward, providing us with a UN Declaration of Human Rights, also in certain circumstances people instinctively have an absolutist attitude; for example cruelty to babies is wrong. On the other hand relativist judgments are always subjective, decreasing the fairness as people might have different losses or benefits because of their actions, people will also disagree on each other’s judgments. This view also stops social development; an example of this would be genocide which should be considered wrong but from a relativist vision it would be analysed depending on circumstances and goals, the holocaust would be an example of this. It is also more complicated to apply than absolutism as there would not be a fixed…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Saying that ethics are relative is an effortless way to avoid a controversial topic concerning ethics. In the case of relativism, we can simply say that your opinion is true and mine too and nothing being wrong with that. On the other hand, ethical absolutism tells us that there is an objective moral code and that certain of our actions as humans are necessarily right or wrong. What would happen if we say two contradictory statements can't coexist as Aristotle demonstrated? Through the law of non-contradiction from Aristotle and ethical absolutism, I will argue against ethical relativism.…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Conflicting absolutism is one of the viable ethical models for Christians. The system contends that moral decisions can involve an obligation to fulfill two or more absolute norms that are mutually exclusive. So if a Christian chooses one norm, the norm rejected is still a moral obligation, and the Christian has to repent for not choosing it. For example, a polygamist, in countries where this is legal, who becomes a Christian and decide to divorce one of the spouse so he can only have one as prescribed in the Bible, has to repent for the divorce (Bradshaw, 2002).…

    • 216 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The theory of cultural relativism is based on a valued judgment between beliefs, culture, and religion. However, cultural relativism incorrectly answers the question, “What is right?” since there is no right or wrong when considering validity. Cultural relativism creates a belief that is the “highest standard” and there should be no biased opinions. Certain cultures tend to believe that they are superior to others. As a result, the different customs that exist are not said to be incorrect or correct and for that our opinions are analyzed with judgment. One’s actions should be evaluated by society rather than one’s culture. In order to understand why the theory of cultural relativism cannot answer the question of “what is right?”, it is criticized by the law of contradiction and the anthro-arrogance.…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays