Preview

Compare and Contrast Absolutism in Fran

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
942 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Compare and Contrast Absolutism in Fran
Terrie Pointer
Period 1
10-3-14
Compare and Contrast France and Roman Absolutism
Absolutism is the acceptance of, or belief in absolute principles in political, philosophical, ethical, or theological matters. French absolutism started with Louis XIV and Russian absolutism started with Peter the Great. Louis XIV ruled from 1643-1714 and Peter the Great ruled from 1699-1725. In French absolutism, the rule of absolute monarchs was not all embracing because they lacked the financial and military resources, and the technology to make it so. France and Russia are alike in absolutism that they both sought to control religion and that they got the rich out of paying taxes. They are different in that Louis XIV wasn’t successful in wars, but Peter the Great was. Religion was an important factor when dealing with Louis XIV and Peter the Great. Louis XIV held simple views regarding religion and it was that the king controlled the Catholic Church and that the Church should do his bidding. Louis got into conflict with some popes, but in the end he got his way, because he was more powerful. Louis believed that what was good for him was good for France. He saw no difference between the two. During Peter's reign the Russian Orthodox Church was reformed. The traditional leader of the Church was the Patriarch of Moscow. In 1700, when the office fell vacant, Peter had refused to name a replacement, allowing the Patriarch's deputy to discharge the duties of the office. In 1721, Peter followed the advice of Feofan Prokopovich and erected the Holy Synod, to take the place of the Patriarch and deputy. Peter also implemented a law which stated that no Russian man could join a monastery before the age of 50. He thought that too many able Russian men were being wasted away by clerical work when they could be joining his army. In 18th century Russia, few people lived to over a half century, therefore very few men became monks during Peter's reign. The monks were not pleased with this. In

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    To make a long story short, Louis XIV tried to have power over everything and everyone possible, including the clergy. Absolutism became a well-known term during this period and basically was a political theory that sought to ? encourage rulers to claim complete sovereignty within their territories.? As an absolute monarch you could ?make laws,…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Absolute Monarchs were eithere kings or queens who controlled the complete way of life in the country they ruled. Absolutism is the rule of one person over any given thing. The two rulers that showed absolutism in the documents are Louis 14th and Peter the Great. They were both absolute monarchs and both ruled over large territories.…

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The church was wealthy, owned lots of land, and refused to modernize, Peter of course was not to stand for this disgust. In the the end he separated the church from the government, made it much weaker and forever changed its roll in its people and government. Finally education was one of peters biggest achievement he created schools of maths, navigation, medicine, engineering, and science and he kept creating till the day he died. Russia was beginning to modernize, more foreigners lived in Russian cities and mixed with Russia people, their western ideas and cultures were mixing with the Russian culture and creating a new modern life. Peter had started the chain of the modernization in Russia and the cruelty…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Peter The Great Influence

    • 1135 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The reign of Peter the Great had a great impact on the Russian Orthodox Church. Peter did not particularly like the Russian Orthodox Church, he saw the church as backwards and still using their traditions which Peter did not like. He also saw the Church as rival to his power. The patriarch’s constant ceremonial presence, pretensions to co-sovereignty, and network of subordinate bishoprics and monasteries evoked an aura of theocracy. For many years the church operated autonomously, but this changed under Peter. When the senior bishop of the Russian Orthodox Church died in 1700 Peter did not appoint a new one. In 1721 Peter replaced the patriarch with a college of the monarch’s clerical appointees dubbed the Holy Synod and assisted by Senate…

    • 1135 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the later portion of the 1600’s, the monarchial systems of both England and France were changing. England strayed away from an absolute monarch and ran toward a mightier parliament instead. The opposite was occurring in France as Louis XIV strengthened his own office while weakening the general assembly of France, the Estates General. Absolutism, the political situation in which a monarch controls makes all political, social, economic, and cultural decisions in a government without checks or balances, had been introduced by Charles I and James I. However, it never took hold. In France, Louis XIV took absolutism to extremes, claiming to be a servant of God. A limited monarch, England’s monarchial system, is a government in which a monarch…

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Absolutism created a time of prosperity throughout the 1500s and the 1600s. At this point of history, absolutism was an efficient way of running a government. Absolutist leaders were vigorous, assertive and a potent symbol of authority. The amount of industrial growth in countries such as Russia was both efficient and effective because the power of authority was concentrated into one person’s hands. Absolutism enabled Peter the Great to modernize and adapt Russia for war, commerce and industrial growth. Additionally, absolutism gave people a powerful leader they needed to trust in and depend on for their country's sake. This type of regnant is most evident King James I of England and King Louis XIV of France. For example, King James…

    • 257 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    DBQ 10 21 14

    • 729 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Absolutism is the idea that one ruler is responsible for an entire empire for everything. More simply, they have control of everything. Absolutism became especially popular in the 1500s with events that were caused because of it. Absolutism has social, political, and religious effects on every-day lives of people and governments, not to mention the unhappy nobles. Absolutism has always been something tha t leaders try to achieve, but either it doesn’t last long or the leader does not achieve full absolute power.…

    • 729 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Peter the Great was the absolute monarch of Russia from 1682 to 1725. His goal was to turn Russia into a better country by “modernizing” it or becoming more westernized (European ).In General Alexander Gordon’s History of Peter The Great , he states ‘He was at little or no expense about his person and by living like a private gentleman than a prince he saved wholly that great expense which other monarchs..support their courts”. This statement shows the character of Alexander and how he saved money because he knew there were more important things than living super fancy .According to Doc. 6 Alexander the Great “... had a great regard for learning and was at much pains to introduce it into the country .” This is an example of how he brought prosperity to Europe by trying his hardest to introduce learning to his country and make a more educated modern place . Another way Peter brought prosperity as an absolute monarch is talked about in document 8 , by Michael Gibson (Excerpt from Peter the Great). Its says “..Russia was in an insignificant state . he made it into a great power feared by all . At his accession Russia had no armed forces ...when he died,there was professional army of 210,000 men . He created a navy out of nothing…

    • 975 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The government never gained a loyal and supportive political power from the rulers of traders involved showing the traditional centralized aristocratic alliance and control over land in the hands of a monarch occasion, and exercised power over the bureaucracy and standing army.…

    • 240 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Peter the great was a strong and tall man with a very hot-tempered character and combat experience as he was a member of the Michael Romanov dynasty. Peter visited the west during 1697-1698, upon his return to Russia he was determined to westernize it similar to Europe. His first priority as to all Kings was to build an army of great power, composed of Russians, Europeans and peasants he created an army of approximately 210,000 men while implementing European technology to make Russia powerful. Peter implemented political reforms beginning with the centralization of power throughout the land by dividing Russia into provinces to maintain control, although many didn’t share his concept of authority to the state very few revolted against him mainly due to his fearful personality. He also built a new city Saint Petersburg as a symbol that Russia was looking westward to Europe where most of his social life policies were implemented and Russia would become more westernized (Duiker World History, 439).…

    • 1352 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Absolutism is the political doctrine and practice of unlimited, centralized authority and absolute sovereignty, as vested especially in a monarch or dictator. The essence of an absolutist system is that the ruling powers is not subject to regularized challenge or check by any other agency, be it judicial, legislative, religious, economic, or electoral. When Louis XIV was king he proclaimed, “I am the state” (Encyclopedia Britannica). This statement alone made by Louis XIV showed familiar assertion of absolutism. It has existed in various forms in all parts of the world, including in Nazi Germany under Adolf Hitler and in the Soviet Union under Joseph Stalin. The most studied form of absolutism would be absolute monarchy. Absolute monarchy originated in early modern Europe and was based on the strong individual leaders of the new nation-states that were created at the breakup of medieval order. The most common defense of monarchical absolutism is known as The Divine Right of…

    • 1631 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dbq 11 Absolutism

    • 279 Words
    • 2 Pages

    During the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries absolutism was a more effective type of government than democracy. Absolutism was a form of government in which all of the power is in the hands of one ruler. Whereas, democracy is when the majority of the power is vested in the people. Absolutism occurred before the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries; therefore it had an example to be or not to be modeled after. Even though most forms of absolutistic governments shared the same thought, they differed in the ways that they were ruled. Democracy was also a form of government during this time but it was not as successful.…

    • 279 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many monarchs, particularly those of European descent, employed the flourishing absolutist philosophy during their reign in the seventeenth century. Defined as the "absolute or unlimited rule usually by one man," absolutism is virtually equivalent to the philosophy of despotism. A ruler incorporating the absolutist philosophy has complete control of his subjects and the highest authority with which to govern. With origins dating back to the Ancient Greeks, absolutism found root in some of Aristotle's theories: "Aristotle despotic government (nearly convertible with tyrannical) is that of a single ruler that rules, not for the public good but for his own." And from Roman political theory "regarding the power of the monarch, there had survived, particularly, a legacy of ideas associated with the position and prestige of a ruler which greatly strengthened the power of a dynasty.” Based on this Greek foundation in Aristotelian thought and Roman political theory, absolutism rose in other schools of philosophy as it gained prominence in the political world.…

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Absolutism, “the political practice of unlimited power and absolute sovereignty, especially as held by a monarch,” was a prominent form of government in Europe until the eighteenth century. Monarchs believed that they alone held the “divine right to rule,” and there were no checks and balances on their authority. Leaders felt as though they were justified in ruling in any way that they wanted, even if it caused harm to their people. France and Spain both had absolutist monarchies for significant amounts of time, the Bourbon house in France and the Hapsburg dynasty in Spain. The most strongly absolutist rulers of those families were King Louis XIV in France and King Philip II in Spain.…

    • 1260 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Absolutism is the principle or exercise of complete or unrestricted power in government. It refers to any political role player that has complete control. This means that they were under the control of a single leader. 1 We see this in the European states in the 17th century, where states were ruled by absolute monarchs. This meant the king ruled with absolute power, with no restrictions or resistance shown against him. This royal authority has been passed down from generation to generation. People believed that kings given a Devine Right to rule by God. 2 Therefore no one even thought of disobeying the king because they were afraid of God. Europe was an unequal society at this time regarding politics, distribution of wealth and social wellness of people. The states primarily concern was collecting taxes from the people, most of which was used to finance the wars.3 Kings did not usually feel a great sense of obligation or liability to the people under his control, because they…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays