“Article 23 of the Indian Constitution – Tool of Protection Against Exploitation”
“Article 23 of the Indian Constitution – Tool of Protection against Exploitation”
TABLE OF CASES * Gaurav Jain v. Union of India, AIR 1997 SC 3021 * In the matter of: Prison Reforms Enhancement of Wages of Prisoners, AIR 1983 Ker.261 * Labourers Working on Salal Hydro Project v. State of Jammu & Kashmir,AIR 1984 SC 177 * Nihal Singh v. Ram Bai, AIR 1987 MP 126 * People’s Union of Democratic Rights v. Union of India, AIR 1982 SC 1473 * Raj Bahadur v. Legal Remembrancer, Govt. of West Bengal, AIR 1953 Cal 522 * Ram Kumar v. State of Bihar, AIR 1984 SC 537 * Rohit Vasavada v. Ge. Man., IFFCO, AIR 1984 Guj 102 * R.K Tangkhul v. R.S. Khullakpa, AIR 1961 Man 1 * Sanjit Roy v. State of Rajasthan, AIR 1983 SC 328 * State of Gujarat v. Hon’ble High Court of Gujarat, AIR 1998 SC 3186 * Suraj v. State of Madhya Pradesh, AIR 1960 MP 303 * Vasudevan v. Mittal, AIR 1962 Bom 53 * Vishal Jeet v. Union of India, AIR 1990 SC 1412
CHAPTER I
-------------------------------------------------
Introduction and Research Methodology
1.1 INTRODUCTION
Article 23 has assumed great significance in recent times and has become potent instrument in the hands of the Courts to ameliorate the pitiable condition of the poor in the country.
Article 23 of the Constitution prohibits traffic in human being and beggar and other similar forms of forced labour. The second part of this Article declares that any contravention of this provision shall be an offence punishable in accordance with law. 1.2 OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY
The research project has been carried out with the following objectives: * The basic objective behind carrying out this research project is to understand the meaning of exploitation and its forms. * Also to find out nexus (if any) between Article 23 and it serving as a protector against exploitation.
1.3 SCOPE
The scope of the present research is limited to analyzing Art 23 of the Indian Constitution and
TABLE OF CASES * Gaurav Jain v. Union of India, AIR 1997 SC 3021 * In the matter of: Prison Reforms Enhancement of Wages of Prisoners, AIR 1983 Ker.261 * Labourers Working on Salal Hydro Project v. State of Jammu & Kashmir,AIR 1984 SC 177 * Nihal Singh v. Ram Bai, AIR 1987 MP 126 * People’s Union of Democratic Rights v. Union of India, AIR 1982 SC 1473 * Raj Bahadur v. Legal Remembrancer, Govt. of West Bengal, AIR 1953 Cal 522 * Ram Kumar v. State of Bihar, AIR 1984 SC 537 * Rohit Vasavada v. Ge. Man., IFFCO, AIR 1984 Guj 102 * R.K Tangkhul v. R.S. Khullakpa, AIR 1961 Man 1 * Sanjit Roy v. State of Rajasthan, AIR 1983 SC 328 * State of Gujarat v. Hon’ble High Court of Gujarat, AIR 1998 SC 3186 * Suraj v. State of Madhya Pradesh, AIR 1960 MP 303 * Vasudevan v. Mittal, AIR 1962 Bom 53 * Vishal Jeet v. Union of India, AIR 1990 SC 1412
CHAPTER I
-------------------------------------------------
Introduction and Research Methodology
1.1 INTRODUCTION
Article 23 has assumed great significance in recent times and has become potent instrument in the hands of the Courts to ameliorate the pitiable condition of the poor in the country.
Article 23 of the Constitution prohibits traffic in human being and beggar and other similar forms of forced labour. The second part of this Article declares that any contravention of this provision shall be an offence punishable in accordance with law. 1.2 OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY
The research project has been carried out with the following objectives: * The basic objective behind carrying out this research project is to understand the meaning of exploitation and its forms. * Also to find out nexus (if any) between Article 23 and it serving as a protector against exploitation.
1.3 SCOPE
The scope of the present research is limited to analyzing Art 23 of the Indian Constitution and
Bibliography: * Jadli, Anurag. “Human traffickers nabbed at Delhi airport.” Mid Day on the web. 8 August, 2011 * Kumar, Ashok [ 20 ]. ESPN CRICINFO. April 27, 2011. Jacob Martin arrested in human-trafficking case [ 21 ]