Juanita Jackson
BCOM/275
03/11/2013
Shelby Frutchey
Article Rebuttal Paper
People are usually considered rebuttal during arguments or discussions, but never rely on real reasoning so that their quotes are more ethical than emotional. When an individual rebut someone or their emotions it’s often considered unethical, but uses of bleakness isn’t characteristically wrong, then to individuals attack personal to with a straight face and a smile. For instance, cell phone usage, this is technology that makes communication easier than traveling. However, this technology is very much needed for everyday life. But as useful as a cell phone is and can be, there’s yet negative vibes about the usage, even though new or up-to-date cell phones are steadily launching. Technology has changed so that developing in the 1980’s, progressed more in early 90’s, then to technology made them more portable as time passed. Now we’re using the internet, texting, and even emailing from cell phones, but frequencies are changed each and every time features are added. Cell phones uses frequencies stronger than a radio but modify so acquirable for human usage. Why? Because profit is thought of first instead of individuals health and this is very harsh. They are devices that are so duplex, yet and still certain usages are said to be limited. This is pathetic, because all kind of studies and scientist are putting liens and advices about limiting usage. People use cellphones sparingly all day until they’re to get rest.
Why would researcher come up with drastic side effects after marketers has created something that’ of great criteria to individuals, and sometimes moments can’t be spared not to answer or use them. Nine studies were looked upon in 2008 at the University of Utah, cited by Herberman, was said thousands of patients were diagnosed with tumors on the brain, was not the analysis of the cell phone. (Article Rebuttal-Does the use of cell phones
References: www.studymode.com