Preview

Article Rebuttal

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
713 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Article Rebuttal
Article Rebuttal - Week Three Paper
December 3, 2012
BCOM275

The Small Arms Trade Treaty has been proposed by the United Nations, and has been signed by our Speaker of the House, Hillary Clinton. The Small Arms Treaty will regulate the illicit trade and movement of unlawfully owned weaponry to all nations and citizens. In the article, The Right to Bear Arms is a Human Right by Newt Gingrich, he argues that the Small Arms Trade Treaty is in violation of the first and second amendments; affecting people’s right to bear arms in the United States or other countries and prevent the citizens of any nation the right to defend themselves. The treaty does not prevent any citizen of any nation the ability to defend them self or take their right to bear arms away.
Gingrich (2012) argues that ”Far fewer women would be raped, far fewer children would be killed, far fewer towns would be destroyed, and far fewer dictators would survive if people everywhere on the planet had this God-given right to bear arms recognized” (para. 8). The treaty is not about the people’s right to bear arms, but to sanction trade throughout the world. The Smalls Arms Treaty will help prevent these terrible things from happening because the tyrants will not have the same ability to gain access to the weapons used to control their nations through militant fear. The sanction will make it more difficult for countries that develop the weapons to legally trade with countries who abuse military abilities.
Gingrich (2012) also argues that “Every person on the planet has the right to defend themselves from those who would oppress them, exploit them, harm them, or kill them” (para. 7). The treaty does not deny people the ability to defend themselves; it attempts to eliminate the process of trade for the individuals who do exploit, harm or attempt to kill them. Self defense is about being able to defend what you think is right, whether that is through a legal system, with your bare hands or other



Citations: Gingrich  (2012), "”Far fewer women would be raped, far fewer children would be killed, far fewer towns would be destroyed, and far fewer dictators would survive if people everywhere on the planet had this God-given right to bear arms recognized”” (para. 7, 8). Gingrich  (2012), "” Every person on the planet has the right to defend themselves from those who would oppress them, exploit them, harm them, or kill them”” (para. 7, 8).

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    If the Fifth Amendment confers its rights on all the world except Americans engaged in defending it, the same must be true of the companion civil-rights Amendments, for none of them is limited by its express terms, territorially or as to persons. Such a construction would mean that during military occupation irreconcilable enemy elements, guerilla fighters, and ‘were-wolves’ could require the American Judiciary to assure them freedoms of speech, press, and assembly as in the First Amendment, right to jury trial as in the Fifth and Sixth Amendments … No decision of this Court supports such a view. None of the learned commentators on our Constitution has ever hinted at it [,] [and] [t]he practices of every modern government is opposed to it.…

    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Concealed Carry

    • 2570 Words
    • 11 Pages

    "The question of concealed carry can be reduced to one of the most perplexing conundrums in politics which comes first, the safety and well-being of the individual, or everyone? Most people would immediately and instinctively say everyone. But what if that certain individual is you? Does society have the right to prevent you from pursuing, and protecting your own self interest?" Gregory Curtis…

    • 2570 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The debate over the restrictions of gun control is centered on the Second Amendment to the Constitution, which gives people the right to bear arms. Gun control supporters believe that this explicit right does not extend to ownership of military-style firearms. For example, groups like the National Rifle Association argue that gun control infringes on the constitutional rights of law-abiding citizens. Gun control is an on-going debate because each year more people are killed by the use of guns. However, guns are not the result in the number of homicides each year, the problems rests with the irresponsible gun users. Gun Control would do nothing but harm America because guns offer protection and security…

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The right to bear arms is an amendment. Our “four founding fathers” fought hard to receive and instill this right. We are the home of the brave and the land of the free; with compromise everyone can be satisfied. All things considered, as Thomas Jefferson proclaimed, “On every question of construction (of the Constitution) let us carry ourselves back to the time when the Constitution was adopted, recollect the spirit manifested in the debates, and instead of trying what meaning may be squeezed out of the text, or invent against it, conform to the probable one in which it was…

    • 1260 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Right to Bear Arms.

    • 410 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Being given the right to bear firearms would give criminals and terrorists an upper hand for committing crime and acts of terror. If people were given the right to bear arms then criminals…

    • 410 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    rebuttalment

    • 643 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I'll start with my opponents first contention that there are a number of jobs in the united states that have to be done if money is being funded into vocational education then the job being sought after will have a better qualified candidate than one that would require a college degree. That maybe be so but what they aren't considering is the fact that after the candidate that is getting a degree is done getting their degree, they will be making double the about of money than someone with vocational education could possible make therefore paying back the amount of money that was funded to them by the government and also making profit instead of losing money. Freebooks.uvu.edu shows that people with vocational education are more than 4 times more likely to be unemployed than doctoral (Ph.D., Ed.D., MD, or JD) graduates. Four-year graduates (Bachelor’s) make $387 more per week than high school grads. That’s $1,548 per month or $18,576 per year more. This pattern holds true among all US racial groups and among males and females. So why fund vocational education when it doesn't really give back to us instead we are just funding education that doesn't farther advance us in any way but wastes money from our government that could go towards preparatory education which does give back and advances us. Also a recently published E-article articulated the many benefits of college graduation that pointed out that the higher your education the better your medical insurance, health, lifestyle for family and next generation, contribution to society, and more. Education, especially earning degrees, is a doorway to many life-long payoffs to college graduates.…

    • 643 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Certainly one of the chief guarantees of freedom under any government, no matter how popular and respected, is the right of the citizen to keep and bear arms. This is not to say that firearms should not be very carefully used and that definite rules of precaution should not be taught and enforced. But the right of the citizen to bear arms is just one more safeguard against a tyranny which now appears remote in America, but which historically has proved to be always possible. -Hubert Humphrey, 1960 My background is probably atypical for a somewhat high-profile supporter of the right to keep and bear arms. I am black and grew up in Manhattan's East Harlem, far removed from the great American gun culture of rural, white America. Although my voting patterns have become somewhat more conservative in recent years, I remain in my heart of hearts a 1960s Humphrey Democrat concerned with the plight of those most vulnerable in American society-minorities, the poor, the elderly, and single women-groups whose day-to-day realities are often overlooked in our public policy debates, people whose lives too often go unnoticed by our intellectually timid chattering classes. This is happening in the public debate over the right to bear arms. For the nation's elites, the Second Amendment has become the Rodney Dangerfield of the Bill of Rights, constantly attacked by editorial writers, police chiefs seeking scapegoats, demagoging politicians, and most recently even by Rosie O'Donnell, no less. It is threatened by opportunistic legislative efforts, even when sponsors acknowledge their proposed legislation would have little impact on crime and violence. Professional champions of civil rights and civil liberties have been unwilling to defend the underlying principle of the right to arms. Even the conservative defense has been timid and often inept, tied less, one suspects, to abiding principle and more to the dynamics of contemporary Republican politics. Thus a right older than the…

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Banning of Handguns

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The banning of handguns can ultimately be a good thing in regards to lowering the count of handguns in circulation but can also be harmful when ideas such as less people being able to protect themselves against criminals. When the idea of the banning of handguns comes into play, it is expected for there to be both negatives and positives to the theory. What we must ultimately find out is which would be more likely to work and at what cost. Professor Daniel Polsby and Philosopher Nicholas Dixon both give some helpful insight into the matter at hand.…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun Control

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Gun Control Since the days of the pioneers of the United States, firearms have been part of the American tradition as protection and a means of hunting or sport. As we near the end of the 20th century the use of guns has changed significantly. Because of fast and steady increase in crime and the fight for the right to own a hand gun, the introduction of legislation for gun control, to try to reduce the crime in the United States, has been a hotly debated issue in recent years. Although many people feel that gun control violates the right of the people, given in the second amendment "the right to bear arms", controlling distribution and sales and the registration of guns and gun owners is necessary because of the homicide rate involving guns and the violence by criminals using guns. Many people feel that gun control violates the right of the people given in the second amendment the right "to bear arms". Opponents of gun control, including the National Rifle Association, better known as the NRA, argue that the "right To bear arms" is guaranteed in the second amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America and licensing restrictions penalize law-abiding citizens while in no way preventing criminal use of handguns. It is also argued that by making it difficult for guns to be bought and registered for the American public there is a threat to the personal safety of American families everywhere. However controlling the sale and distribution of firearms is necessary because of the homicide rate involving guns. In 1988 there were 9000 handgun related murders in America. Metropolitan centers and some suburban communities of America are setting new records for homicides by handguns. Larger Metropolitan centers have ten times the murder rate of all Western Europe. For example in Washington,D.C. there was an estimated 400 homicides including guns. In addition gun control has been seen as necessary because of the violence…

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” (Reuters, 2012) Many years ago some great men got together and wrote our country what we now call The Constitution. Our country was founded on beliefs such as these and many men and women gave their lives just to get us these rights and even more died protecting them. If there would have been gun control back when we were slaves to England we very well might still be slaves to a country and not be able to live the way we do today. We as Americans have the right to own a firearm if we so choose, and many take full advantage.…

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Recent events have brought the heated debate about gun control to atomic levels in the United States. For some Americans, it seems of no question that we should limit or even ban an individual’s right to bear arms for the greater good of our nation. For others, the right to own a firearm is one of the fundamental liberties afforded the citizens of this country and to restrict that right intrudes on the very essence of being American.…

    • 930 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    There are new proposed gun control laws in the aftermath of the massacre at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newton, Connecticut that occurred on December 14th, 2012. This incident claimed the lives of twenty 1st graders and six adults and has set the government in motion to try to prevent future acts of violence by strengthening gun control laws in the United States (Smith). This has been a topic that has been an extremely emotional debate with people on both sides unwilling to compromise. Gun advocates and critics of the new proposed gun laws argue that these new laws infringe on our constitutional right to bear arms; however, the new laws do not take away that right, they simply add minor restrictions in the search to put an end to gun violence. With the rise in gun violence today, we need to take some sort of action.…

    • 1405 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Argumentative Essay the Right to Bear Arms UNIVERSIDAD DEL TURABO NAGUABO, PUERTO RICO ARGUMENTATIVE ESSAY FINAL HOMEWORK LURDES M. PEREZ S00604108 PROF. RAMOS/ENGLISH 153 Right To Bear Arms Imagine waking up in the middle of the night to a complete stranger who is in your house, threatening to harm you, and your family,Premium 1158 Words 5 Pages…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fourteen-year-old Jessica Carpenter was left to babysit her younger siblings while her parents were running errands the morning of August 23, 2000. Armed with only a pitchfork, Jonathon David Bruce, who was high on drugs, entered the home and began chasing and stabbing the children. Jessica’s father had taught her how to use a firearm, but she could not access the gun because it was locked up in accordance with California state law. She was left unprotected and unable to defend herself and her family (Pratt). Situations like these are why it is necessary for our right to bear arms to not be infringed. Guns, when allowed to be carried by citizens, can cause a decrease in crime. “If a criminal thinks his potential victim may be armed, he may be deterred from committing the crime” (Freakonomics)…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays