Article: the Role of Marketing
Christine Moorman & Roland T. Rust
The Role of Marketing
As marketing gains increasing prominence as an orientation that everyone in the organization shares and as a process that all functions participate in deploying, a critical issue that arises is the role of the marketing function. Specifically, what role should the marketing function play, and what value does the marketing function have, if any, in an organization that has a strong market orientation? The authors take the view that though a firm’s market orientation is undeniably important, the marketing function should play a key role in managing several important connections between the customer and critical firm elements, including connecting the customer to (1) the product, (2) service delivery, and (3) financial accountability. The authors collect data from managers across six business functions and two time periods with respect to marketing’s role, market orientation, the value of the marketing function, and perceived firm performance. The results show that the marketing function contributes to perceptions of firm financial performance, customer relationship performance, and new product performance beyond that explained by a firm’s market orientation. Marketing’s value, in turn, is found to be a function of the degree to which it develops knowledge and skills in connecting the customer to the product and to financial accountability. For service firms, the value of the marketing function also is related positively to marketing’s ability to connect the customer to service delivery.
ooking broadly at the marketing literature and practice, it appears that during the past ten years there has been a movement toward thinking of marketing less as a function and more as a set of values and processes that all functions participate in implementing. In this view, marketing becomes everybody’s job, which potentially diffuses the marketing function’s role but increases marketing’s influence (Greyser 1997). As
The Role of Marketing
As marketing gains increasing prominence as an orientation that everyone in the organization shares and as a process that all functions participate in deploying, a critical issue that arises is the role of the marketing function. Specifically, what role should the marketing function play, and what value does the marketing function have, if any, in an organization that has a strong market orientation? The authors take the view that though a firm’s market orientation is undeniably important, the marketing function should play a key role in managing several important connections between the customer and critical firm elements, including connecting the customer to (1) the product, (2) service delivery, and (3) financial accountability. The authors collect data from managers across six business functions and two time periods with respect to marketing’s role, market orientation, the value of the marketing function, and perceived firm performance. The results show that the marketing function contributes to perceptions of firm financial performance, customer relationship performance, and new product performance beyond that explained by a firm’s market orientation. Marketing’s value, in turn, is found to be a function of the degree to which it develops knowledge and skills in connecting the customer to the product and to financial accountability. For service firms, the value of the marketing function also is related positively to marketing’s ability to connect the customer to service delivery.
ooking broadly at the marketing literature and practice, it appears that during the past ten years there has been a movement toward thinking of marketing less as a function and more as a set of values and processes that all functions participate in implementing. In this view, marketing becomes everybody’s job, which potentially diffuses the marketing function’s role but increases marketing’s influence (Greyser 1997). As
References: Aaker, David A. and Robert Jacobson (1994), “The Financial Information Content of Perceived Quality,” Journal of Marketing Research, 31 (May), 191–201. Anderson, Eugene W., Claes Fornell, and Roland T. Rust (1997), “Customer Satisfaction, Productivity and Profitability: Differences Between Goods and Services,” Marketing Science, 16 (2), 129–45. Anderson, Paul F. (1982), “Marketing, Strategic Planning, and the Theory of the Firm,” Journal of Marketing, 46 (Spring), 15–26. Blattberg, Robert C. and John Deighton (1996), “Manage Marketing by the Customer Equity Test,” Harvard Business Review, 74 (July/August), 136–44. Bolton, Ruth N. and James Drew (1991), “A Longitudinal Analysis of the Impact of Service Changes on Customer Attitudes,” Journal of Marketing, 55 (January), 1–9. 196 / Journal of Marketing, Special Issue 1999 Day, George S. (1990), Market-Driven Strategy. New York: The Free Press. ——— (1994), “The Capabilities of Market-Driven Organizations,” Journal of Marketing, 58 (October), 37–52. ——— (1997), “Aligning the Organization to the Market,” in Reflections on the Futures of Marketing, Donald R. Lehmann and Katherine E. Jocz, eds. Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute, 67–96. ——— and Prakash Nedungadi (1994), “Managerial Representations of Competitive Advantage,” Journal of Marketing, 58 (April), 31–44. Deshpandé, Rohit, John U. Farley, and Frederick E. Webster Jr. (1993), “Corporate Culture, Customer Orientation, and Innovativeness in Japanese Firms: A Quadrad Analysis,” Journal of Marketing, 52 (January), 23–36. Dougherty, Deborah (1990), “Understanding New Markets for New Products,” Strategic Management Journal, 11 (Summer), 59–78. ——— (1992), “Interpretive Barriers to Successful Product Innovation in Large Firms,” Organization Science, 3 (May), 179–202. Fiol, C. Marlene (1994), “Consensus, Diversity, and Learning in Organizations,” Organization Science, 5 (August), 403–20. Fornell, Claes (1992), “A National Customer Satisfaction Barometer: The Swedish Experience,” Journal of Marketing, 56 (January), 6–21. Frankwick, Gary L., James C. Ward, Michael D. Hutt, and Peter H. Reingen (1994), “Evolving Patterns of Organizational Beliefs in the Formation of Strategy,” Journal of Marketing, 58 (April), 96–110. Grant, Robert M. (1996), “Prospering in Dynamically Competitive Environments: Organizational Capability as Knowledge Integration,” Organization Science, 7 (July-August), 375–87. Greyser, Stephen A. (1997), “Janus and Marketing: The Past, Present, and Prospective Future of Marketing,” in Reflections on the Futures of Marketing, Donald R. Lehmann and Katherine Jocz, eds. Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute, 3–14. Griffin, Abbie and Albert L. Page (1993), “An Interim Report on Measuring Product Development Success and Failure,” Journal of Product Innovation Management, 10 (September), 291–308. Haeckel, Stephan H. (1997), “Preface,” in Reflections on the Futures of Marketing, Donald R. Lehmann and Katherine Jocz, eds. Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute, ix–xvi. Hauser, John R. and Don Clausing (1988), “The House of Quality,” Harvard Business Review, 66 (May/June), 63–73. Homburg, Christian, John P. Workman Jr., and Harley Krohmer (1999), “Marketing’s Influence Within the Firm,” Journal of Marketing, 63 (April), 1–17. Howard, John A. (1983), “Marketing Theory of the Firm,” Journal of Marketing, 47 (Fall), 90–100. Jaworski, Bernard J. and Ajay K. Kohli (1993), “Market Orientation: Antecedents and Consequences,” Journal of Marketing, 57 (July), 53–71. Kohli, Ajay K. and Bernard J. Jaworski (1990), “Market Orientation: The Construct, Research Propositions, and Managerial Implications,” Journal of Marketing, 54 (April), 1–18. ———, ———, and Ajith Kumar (1993), “MARKOR: A Measure of Market Orientation,” Journal of Marketing Research, 30 (November), 467–77. ——— and Gerald Zaltman (1988), “Measuring Multiple Buying Influences,” Industrial Marketing Management, 17 (August), 197–205. Kordupleski, Ray, Roland T. Rust, and Anthony J. Zahorik (1993), “Why Improving Quality Doesn’t Improve Quality,” California Management Review, 35 (Spring), 82–95. Lawrence, Paul R. and Jay W. Lorsch (1967), “Differentiation and Integration in Complex Organizations,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 12 (June), 1–47. Lehmann, Donald R. (1997), “Some Thoughts on the Future of Marketing,” in Reflections on the Futures of Marketing, Donald R. Lehmann and Katherine Jocz, eds. Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute, 121–36. McKenna, Regis (1991), “Marketing Is Everything,” Harvard Business Review, 69 (January/February), 65–79. Moorman, Christine (1995), “Organizational Market Information Processes: Cultural Antecedents and New Product Outcomes,” Journal of Marketing Research, 32 (August), 318–35. ——— and Anne S. Miner (1997), “The Impact of Organizational Memory on New Product Performance and Creativity,” Journal of Marketing Research, 34 (February), 91–106. Narver, John C. and Stanley F. Slater (1990), “The Effect of a Market Orientation on Business Profitability,” Journal of Marketing, 54 (October), 20–35. Ruekert, Robert W. and Orville C. Walker Jr. (1987), “Marketing’s Interaction with Other Functional Units: A Conceptual Framework and Empirical Evidence,” Journal of Marketing, 51 (January), 1–19. Rust, Roland T., Anthony J. Zahorik, and Timothy L. Keiningham (1995), “Return on Quality (ROQ): Making Service Quality Financially Accountable,” Journal of Marketing, 59 (April), 58–70. Srivastava, Rajendra K., Tasadduq A. Shervani, and Liam Fahey (1998), “Market-Based Assets and Shareholder Value: A Framework for Analysis,” Journal of Marketing, 62 (January), 2–18. Thompson, Arthur A., Jr. and A.J. Strickland III (1983), Strategy Formulation and Implementation. Plano, TX: Business Publications, Inc. Webster, Frederick E., Jr. (1989), “It’s 1990—Do you Know Where Your Marketing Is?” Marketing Science Report 89-123. Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute. ——— (1992), “The Changing Role of Marketing in the Corporation,” Journal of Marketing, 56 (October), 1–17. ——— (1997), “The Future Role of Marketing in the Organization,” in Reflections on the Futures of Marketing, Donald R. Lehmann and Katherine Jocz, eds. Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute, 39–66. Weitz, Barton A. and Erin Anderson (1981), “Organizing the Marketing Function,” in Review of Marketing, Ben Enis and Kenneth Roering, eds. Chicago: American Marketing Association, 134–42. Wind, Jerry (1996), “Mastering Management—Part 15 (6): Big Questions for the 21st Century,” Financial Times, (February 16), iv. Workman, John P., Jr., Christian Homburg, and Kjell Gruner (1998), “Marketing Organization: An Integrative Framework of Dimensions and Determinants,” Journal of Marketing, 62 (July), 21–41. The Role of Marketing / 197 Reprinted with permission from Journal of Marketing, published by the American Marketing Association.