Preview

Articulatory Phonetics

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
385 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Articulatory Phonetics
THE WORLD OF IDEAS

Empedocles and Democritus - believes that although in the natural world everything ‘flows’, there must be ‘something’ that never changes (the ‘four roots [Empedocles] or the ‘atoms’ [Democritus])

Plato - Believed that everything tangible in nature ‘flows’. - That there are no ‘substance’ that do not dissolve. - Said that, “Everything that belongs to the ‘material world’ is made of a material that time can erode, but everything is made after a timeless ‘mold’ or ‘form’ that is eternal and immutable. (Which means, everything that we can touch will perish or will die; has an ending. But the memory of it remains forever.) - That which is eternal and immutable, to Plato, is therefore not a physical ‘basic substance’. - Plato’s conception was of eternal and immutable patterns, spiritual and abstract in their nature, that all things are fashioned after. (Which means, all things are made because of ideas.) - Pre-Socratics (Time before Socrates): had given a reasonable explanation for HOW these “smallest elements” that were once building blocks in a horse could suddenly whirl together four or five hundred years later and fashion themselves into a completely new horse. - PLATO’S POINT: Democritus’ atoms never fashioned themselves into an “eledile” or a “crocophant”. EXAMPLE: You have a box of lego and you build a lego horse. You take it apart and put the blocks back in the box. How could lego blocks of their own find each other and build themselves into a new horse again? You have to rebuild the horse. And to build it, you should have a picture of what the horse looks like. Model of horse remains unchanged from horse to horse. EXPLANATION: To form a thing, one should have a picture of what that thing looks like. And things do not form on its own, there must be someone who creates it.

( Plato was astonished at the way all natural phenomena could be so alike and he concluded that it had to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    I agree with Plato's objections stated above, however not to the degree where what is…

    • 1177 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unit 9 worksheet

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Democritus agreed that everything which is must be internal, but denied that “the void” can be equated with nothing. This makes him the first thinker on record to bicker for the existence of something that people thought didn’t exist. To explain the change around us from basic, unchangeable substance he argued that there are different elements which have existed since the beginning of time but it can be rearranged into different forms. He bickered yet again, this time about how atoms only had several properties particularly size, shape, and mass. All other properties that we attribute to matter, such as color and taste, are but the results of complex contact…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato was a dualist and so believed that human beings consisted of two parts- body and soul. This view is portrayed throughout Plato’s famous theory of the Forms of which he suggests that true substances are not physical bodies, but are the eternal Forms that our bodies are merely the imperfect copy. In his Theory he tells of a World of Forms representing knowledge, which he also names the ‘real’ world and the world of Particulars signifying opinions, the world in which we live in. The Forms come from a world of perfection which are illuminated by the Form of the Good which is at the top of the hierarchy and is the source of which the other Forms stemmed from.…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato developed the theory that behind every concept or object in the visible world there is an unseen reality which he calls its ‘Form’. These Forms exist in the world of the Forms separate from our world of sensory perception. Within the world of the Forms the pattern or the objects and concepts for the material world exist in a state of unchanging perfection. Plato suggested the idea of forms in his book “De Republica”, which is a dialogue between Socrates and Glaucon, and the idea of dualism. Plato suggested that there are two worlds (dualism) we live in one of sensory perception and the true forms live in one of rational knowledge.…

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato understood that there are concepts that we can all recognise in various things, for example the concept of beauty. We all recognise beauty in art, nature, people, or music, and we all understand the idea when we hear the word used. Although we can all recognise beauty, our opinions of what classes as beautiful are widely varied and subjective. The conclusions Plato drew from this is that beauty must exist, otherwise we would not know it at all. This is the Perfect Form of Beauty. However, we must have only partial knowledge of it or we would not have subjective opinions.…

    • 622 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle vs Plato

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Aristotle’s and Plato’s views on forms were very different. Plato saw “forms” as descriptions and something like adjectives and it could be applied to more than one thing. If something was “delicious,” there was something else that was also “delicious” but they were not the same thing. These descriptions are real but are not physical matter. Aristotle, however, saw reality as having four causes: matter (what it is made up of), essence (what it is), producer…

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato thought that there were two worlds: the everyday changing world in which we exist, the world of becoming, and the unchanging world of eternal truths, the world of being. In this world of being Plato illustrates that the eidos, or forms, define what a substance truly is and that each and every thing has a Form on which it falls under. For example, we know the Form of a human so any human we come into contact with, regardless of size, shape, or color; we know to put them in the category of human because they fit the eternal Form. Depicted in his allegory of the cave, Plato comes to the belief that our everyday world is thought not to be an illusion but more like a “set…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle, although the student of Plato, had a very different outlook on the theory of physical and universal forms. He is well known to have provided one of the most famous criticisms of The Forms in his ‘Third Man Argument’. He derived that if a man is a copy of the ‘Form of Man’ and that every object in the physical world has a copy in the World of Forms; there therefore must be a copy of the copy of the ‘Form of Man’. This creates two questions: Is the man in the physical realm simply a copy of the Form of Man? Or is the man a duplicate of the copy of the copy of the Form of Man? This paradox relinquishes the Theory of Forms as apparently meaningless.…

    • 745 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Democritus was a greek philosopher who thought that all matter was composed of indivisble particles called atoms which is greek for “uncuttable”. He was born in 460 BC in Abdera which is in North Greece. Democritus wrote appoximately seventy books including books about the atomistic theory. He didn’t accept the Eleatic hypothesis that “everything is one” and that change and motion are an illusion. He then explained motion and change. He said change was an observation that does not deceive the senses; change is real. Democritus succeeded by inventing the concept of atoms for which he is still known.…

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    "Neither his kind, nor his kind of thinking will survive long. They are the crown of creation, they are ambition fulfilled - they have nowhere more to go. But life is change, that is how it differs from the rocks, change is its very nature. Who, then, were the recent lords of creation, that they should expect to remain unchanged?"…

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Aristotle is one of the greatest philosophers that have ever lived. He offered answers to questions in life from his learning from another great philosopher, Plato. His beliefs of the ultimate nature of reality focused on a teleological universe. This meant that everything was moving towards its telos or goal in life. He said that materials are fully real and are what senseperception reveals. “Tode ti” was his famous quote meaning this thing here. These real materials in life were all trying to move to their telos. They were very mechanical, and were just moving because it was their goal to reach during their life time.…

    • 1755 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Timaeus Vs Plato

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A main theme throughout Timaeus was the creation of the universe from an eternal and immutable model, a perfect model for an imperfect copy. “Everyone will see that he must have looked to, the eternal; for the world is the fairest of creations and he is the best of causes.” A problem arises in that, despite Plato’s insistence that “there must be one only, if the created copy is to accord with the original,” a previous sphere was in existence before the Creator’s universe was. According to Plato, this sphere was moving disorderly, a clear indication it was not the organized and rational model. Timaeus later goes on to explain the creation of the universe as a sphere, with no limbs or organs, and created from the four elements so it is unlikely that the “original” sphere became the universe. This disordered visible sphere was not mentioned except for near the beginning of the…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He thought that everything had a sort of ideal form, like the idea of a chair, and then an actual chair was a sort of poor imitation of the ideal chair that exists only in your mind. One of the ways Plato tried to explain his ideas with the famous metaphor of the cave. He said, suppose there is a cave, and inside the cave there are some men chained up to a wall, so that they can only see the back wall of the cave and nothing else. These men can't see anything outside of the cave, or even see each other clearly, but they can see shadows of what is going on outside the cave. Wouldn't these prisoners come to think that the shadows were real, and that was what things really looked…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Plato was from the time of approximately 400BC and stated that the human body with all its parts must owe it’s origin to a creator. Plato was a Pagan and believed in numerous Greek gods. In his work The Timaeus he suggests that a cosmic craftsman (‘the Demiurge’) may have brought together the materials of the universe to make it orderly and beautiful. Plato’s theory of forms (or ideas) lies at the heart of his philosophy. It follows on directly from his allegory of the cave and understanding reality. This theory suggests that a realm of forms exist, perfect ideals of which things in this world are but imperfect. The world that we see around us, according to this theory, is but a pale shadow of the ultimate reality. Things may appear beautiful, or just, insofar as they imitate the form of Beauty and Justice. But the imperfect and changeable world cannot capture the glory of the eternal and immutable…

    • 1606 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Everything is determined, the beginning as well as the end, by forces over which we have no control. It is determined for the insect, as well as for the star. Human beings, vegetables, or cosmic dust, we all dance to a mysterious tune, intoned in the distance by an invisible piper.”…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays