Preview

Asdfa

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
385 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Asdfa
Be it resolved: Torturing potential terrorists for the greater good of the world is ethical as a it is for the greater good of the people.

Against:

Torture is never ethical even if it is being done to potential terrorists.

Philosophy of Ethics |Opening Statement: |
|As human beings all people have the right to their dignity, which should not be stripped of them through the act of torture even if|
|the information can be used for the greater good of the people. |
| |
| |
| |
| |

|Supporting Arguments (with sources) |Evidence, Quotes, Analogies (with sources) |
| | |
|Immanuel Kant argued that moral requirements are based on a standard of | "Act in such a way that you treat humanity, whether in |
|rationality he dubbed the “Categorical Imperative” (CI). Immorality thus |your own person or in the person of another, always at |
|involves a violation of the CI and is thereby irrational. |the same time as an end and never simply as a means." |
| |
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Asdf
    • 3052 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Asdf

    A student was shown a demonstration in which a sample of an element was heated strongly in air, and the powder produced by the reaction was added to water. When tested with a pH probe connected to a data logger, the resulting solution had a pH of 9. Which one of the following elements could have been used? (A) (B) (C) (D) S C Si Ca…

    • 3052 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Compaire and Contrast of Torture
    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Compaire and Contrast of Torture

    At some point everyone has heard of torture. It could have been in a movie or on the news, but they have heard of it. In this day and age, people would like to have believed it was all behind us in the past. Then 9/11 happened, everyone’s lives were changed with one simple act of cruelty. Before 9/11 hit the U.S. in a wave of pain, panic, and anger, our viewpoints on torture would probably have been less likely that it should be allowed. The decision to torture people who are suspected of being part of terrorist groups has always been decided by the government, for the simple reason that it is required to keep us safe from harm. Some people believe that torture is cruel, unsightly and just inhumane. On the other hand there are people who see it the same way but also believe it could be necessary in extreme circumstances. We’re going to look at two different points of torture: When it is acceptable and when it is not acceptable.…

    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Kant's Categorical Imperative
    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Kant's Categorical Imperative

    Emmanuel Kant (hereinafter “Kant”) believes that Ethics is categorical and states that our moral duties are not dependent on feelings but on reason. He further states that our moral duties are unconditional, universally valid, and necessary, regardless of the possible consequences or opposition to our inclinations (Pojman and Vaughn 239).…

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Discuss Three That You Consider Very Important, And Defend Their Morals?
    • 654 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Discuss Three That You Consider Very Important, And Defend Their Morals?

    No matter the circumstances torture is considered unlawful and not allowed. This should not be a situational decision. Individuals should not have the power to pick and choose when torture is okay to carry out. No one should be held responsible for admitting to a crime to prevent torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. Article 29 states that (1) Everyone has duties to the community in which alone the free and full development of his personality is possible; (2)…

    • 654 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Asdf
    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Asdf

    For this essay, you are required to analyze two assigned readings and document your essay with references to primary text(s) and between two and four secondary sources. Ensure that you directly answer the essay question and make significant reference to at least two of the course readings to support your perspective on the question.…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Best Essays

    Con Torture
    • 2313 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Con Torture

    In a post-9/11 world, where it seems that terrorism is rampant and increasing numbers of extremists threaten the safety and wellbeing of American citizens, is it ever justified to bend the rules of legality and morality while fighting the war on terror? Whether or not the use of torture as an interrogation tactic is justified in these circumstances is questionable because of controversy about its legality, morality, and effectiveness; the use of torture would violate several international and domestic laws as well as compromise American morals and beliefs. Despite this controversy, the United States has employed these tactics in recent years to questionable effect; however, the use of it is illegal, immoral and ineffective. Torture should not be used in any circumstance because it violates American morals, political treaties, and laws, would diminish the reputation of the United States in the world, has not been proven effective by scientific evidence, and would create a future of uncertainty regarding the use of torture.…

    • 2313 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Arguments Against Torture
    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Arguments Against Torture

    Justifying the needs of implementing various methods of torture is strongly a recommended option to protecting America’s security and American citizens. While the debate of whether the use of torture is valid to protect the United States of America overall, supporters of the argument strongly argue that interrogating terrorists is only useful when various torture methods are involved. During one of the United States of America’s darkest periods in the nation’s history, the terrorists attack of September 11, 2001 rebooted the discussion of how various methods of torture are a justifiable means to not only place vengeance on the terrorists involved in the attacks on America’s soil. In the course of the aftermath of the horrific attacks of September 11, 2001, supporters of using various methods of torture during the interrogation process observed a central argument to prove their case. For example, if America’s security becomes unfortunately at risk of another terrorists attack, the nation could potentially protect Americans by implementing various methods of torture to only not question terrorists’ against their willpower.…

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Kant's Humanity Formula
    • 1663 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Kant's Humanity Formula

    "Few formulas in philosophy have been so widely accepted and variously interpreted as Kant's injunction to treat humanity as an end in itself"(Hill, 38). Immanuel Kant's views, as elucidated in his book, Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, are based on the belief that "people count" by prohibiting actions which exploit other individuals in order for self-prosperity or altruistic ends. Ethics then, are confirmed by the dignity and worth of the rational agency of each person. Since human beings are the only rational beings capable of decision making and reasonable judgement, humanity must be valued. Kant proposes a test that ensures that humanity is treated with respect, and not used merely as an instrument. To understand how he defines this test, we must first take a look at the foundation of his main principle, the Categorical Imperative.…

    • 1663 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Kantian Perspective Kant
    • 1714 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Kantian Perspective Kant

    According to Kant, categorical imperative is the basis of morality which is determined by a persons’ intent rather than their action. It is motivated by pure reasoning and must apply to everyone regardless of preference. For this reason, Kant introduced the principle of universalizability. It is a three part test using questions to determine if our actions are being universally consistent, fair or selfish. Kant also believes the only good without qualification is good will and only the action performed for the sake of duty are moral. Kant was committed to treating everyone with value, dignity and respect. Even today, Kant’s theories still have a direct impact on how morality is…

    • 1714 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Kant's Categorical Imperative: Ethical Theory
    • 166 Words
    • 1 Page

    Kant's Categorical Imperative: Ethical Theory

    I believe Kant’s concept of categorical imperative holds merit as an ethical theory. The idea that one should take an action only if they believe it can be accepted as a universal law by everyone has strength to it as an ethical code, because it, to me, is very similar to the golden rule that one should treat other as they wished to be treated. In order for an action to be morally correct and right, it is necessary that it can be said that it just regardless of whom it is taken against, and that it be can recognized as such even if its subject is one’s self. Because of this, the categorical imperative holds merit to me, because before one takes an action, it is important, from a moral standpoint, for an individual to determine whether or not…

    • 166 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Kantian Ethical Analysis Essay
    • 1483 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Kantian Ethical Analysis Essay

    Reason, declared Kant, is the source and ultimate basis for morality. Morality wholly rests in pure, innate reason and not in intuition, conscience, law, or utility. The standard of morality, therefore, is inherent in the human mind; it is definable only in terms of the mind; and it is derived from one’s innerself by direct perception (Cavico & Mujtaba, 2013). According to Kant, in order to be moral, one has to be rational. “The right use of reason is directed to moral ends” (Cavico & Mujtaba, 2009). A person has to think rationally, he or she does not have think only about self-interest. As a result of that, there is no place for such thing as Ethical Egoism. People should be treated with dignity…

    • 1483 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Kantian Ethics
    • 399 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Kantian Ethics

    Kantian ethics is a deontological ethical theory first proposed by German philosopher Immanuel Kant. The theory, developed as a result of Enlightenment rationalism, is based on the view that the only intrinsically good thing is a good will; therefore an action can only be good if the maxim, or principle, behind it is duty to the moral law. Central to Kant's construction of the moral law is the categorical imperative, which acts on all people, regardless of their interests or desires. Kant formulated the categorical imperative in various ways. His principle of universalisability requires that, for an action to be permissible, it must be possible to apply it to all people without a contradiction occurring. His formula of humanity as an ends in itself requires that humans are never treated merely as a means to an end, but always also as ends in themselves. The formula of autonomy concludes that rational agents are bound to the moral law by their own will, and Kant's Kingdom of Ends formula requires that people must act as if the principles of their actions will establish a law for a hypothetical kingdom of ends. Kant also distinguished between perfect and imperfect duties. A perfect duty, such as the duty not to lie, always holds true; an imperfect duty, such as the duty to give to charity, can be made flexible and applied to certain times and places.…

    • 399 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Argumentative Essay: Is Torture Ever Justified?
    • 1902 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Argumentative Essay: Is Torture Ever Justified?

    Is it ever ethically justified to torture a terrorist to save millions of innocent lives, or is it always unjustifiable to torture a person? Imagine one summer day when all the news stations broadcast a message saying that a terrorist has planted a nuclear bomb in New York City and that the bomb will detonate in approximately one hour and two million civilians will parish. The news then says that the terrorist has been captured, but the only way to find out the key information to stop the detonation is by torturing the terrorist. Although torturing the terrorist is the only method of retrieving the location of the bomb, the torturing of an individual is not ethical. No matter the severity and impact of the crime, the torturing of an individual should never be justified due to its inhuman methods, ineffectiveness and immorality.…

    • 1902 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Categorical Imperative Research Paper
    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Categorical Imperative Research Paper

    Throughout Kant’s, Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals, some questionable ideas are portrayed. These ideas conflict with the present views of most people living today. In many ways Kant’s beliefs are tested and compared to other similar ideas while his work is still relevant today in making ethical decisions. All the while not involving a religious stand point onto the deliberative decisions making process, Kant illustrates the all too familiar ‘Golden Rule’ through Categorical Imperative, the basis of a moral human…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Emmanuel Kant's Moral Philosophy
    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Emmanuel Kant's Moral Philosophy

    The moral philosophy of Immanuel Kant is the most straightforward and solid in foundation of all ethical theories. Kant’s ethics are simple because they have a black and white (right and wrong) format. Many people cling to his thinking because his moral philosophy offers a firm solution to ethical questions, and this firmness removes any uneasiness in the agents mind. The central theme that sums up Kant’s moral reasoning is his categorical imperative, “I am never to act otherwise than so that I could also will that my maxim should become a universal law.” (306) By this Kant means that one should never perform an action unless they think that action would also be acceptable for everyone else to perform. Kant is not a relativist, which is someone who thinks that the morality of actions is subject to change based on the situation, but rather is an absolutist, believing each action has a universal morality regardless of the situation or consequences.…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics